Cargando…
Benefit-harm analysis and charts for individualized and preference-sensitive prevention: example of low dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines provide separate recommendations for different diseases that may be prevented or treated by the same intervention. Also, they commonly provide recommendations for entire populations but not for individuals. To address these two limitations, our aim was to con...
Autores principales: | Puhan, Milo A., Yu, Tsung, Stegeman, Inge, Varadhan, Ravi, Singh, Sonal, Boyd, Cynthia M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0493-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. A Benefit and Harm Analysis
por: Stegeman, Inge, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Older adult preferences regarding benefits and harms of statin and aspirin therapy for cardiovascular primary prevention()
por: Wang, Frances M., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A framework for organizing and selecting quantitative approaches for benefit-harm assessment
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Quantitative benefit–harm assessment for setting research priorities: the example of roflumilast for patients with COPD
por: Puhan, Milo A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Should statin guidelines consider patient preferences? Eliciting preferences of benefit and harm outcomes of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the sub-Saharan African and European contexts
por: Yebyo, Henock G., et al.
Publicado: (2018)