Cargando…

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Formoterol and salmeterol are two long-acting β2-agonists given by inhalation, with bronchodilating effects lasting for at least 12 h after a single administration. Formoterol has a faster onset of action compared with salmeterol. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velayati, Ashraf, Hosseini, Seyed Alireza, Sari, Ali Akbari, Mohtasham, Farideh, Ghanei, Mostafa, Yaghoubi, Mohsen, Majdzadeh, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4590204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26487878
_version_ 1782392888538169344
author Velayati, Ashraf
Hosseini, Seyed Alireza
Sari, Ali Akbari
Mohtasham, Farideh
Ghanei, Mostafa
Yaghoubi, Mohsen
Majdzadeh, Reza
author_facet Velayati, Ashraf
Hosseini, Seyed Alireza
Sari, Ali Akbari
Mohtasham, Farideh
Ghanei, Mostafa
Yaghoubi, Mohsen
Majdzadeh, Reza
author_sort Velayati, Ashraf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Formoterol and salmeterol are two long-acting β2-agonists given by inhalation, with bronchodilating effects lasting for at least 12 h after a single administration. Formoterol has a faster onset of action compared with salmeterol. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the data published from previous review in order to calculate pooled estimates of effectiveness and safety assessment of formoterol and salmeterol in treatment of patients with asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we conducted an electronic search for medical citation databases including Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and IranMedex. Besides manual search of the databases that record randomized clinical trials, conference proceedings, and journals related to asthma were included. Studies were evaluated by two independent people based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the common outcomes of studies were entered into the RevMan 5.0.1 software, after evaluation of studies and extraction of data from them; and in cases where there were homogeneous studies, meta-analysis was performed, and for heterogeneous studies, the results were reported qualitatively. RESULTS: Of the 1539 studies initially found, 13 were included in the study. According to the meta-analysis conducted, no significant difference was found between the inhalation of formoterol 12 μg and salmeterol 50 μg in the two outcomes of mean forced expiratory volume 1 s (FEV1), 12 h after inhalation of medication and Borg score (A frequently used scale for quantifying breathlessness) after inhalation of medication. In addition, salmeterol was more effective than formoterol in the two outcomes of percent decrease in FEV1 after inhalation of methacholine and the number of days without an attack. Since the two outcomes of FEV1 30-60 min after inhalation of medication and morning peak expiratory flow after inhalation of medication were heterogeneous, they had no meta-analysis capabilities, and its results were reported qualitatively. CONCLUSION: The data from included studies shows that, more efficacy has been achieved with Salmeterol, especially in some outcomes such as the percent decrease in FEV1 after inhalation of Methacholine, and the number of days without an attack; and therefore, the administration of Salmeterol seems to be beneficial for patients, compared with Formoterol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4590204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45902042015-10-20 Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis Velayati, Ashraf Hosseini, Seyed Alireza Sari, Ali Akbari Mohtasham, Farideh Ghanei, Mostafa Yaghoubi, Mohsen Majdzadeh, Reza J Res Med Sci Review Article BACKGROUND: Formoterol and salmeterol are two long-acting β2-agonists given by inhalation, with bronchodilating effects lasting for at least 12 h after a single administration. Formoterol has a faster onset of action compared with salmeterol. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the data published from previous review in order to calculate pooled estimates of effectiveness and safety assessment of formoterol and salmeterol in treatment of patients with asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we conducted an electronic search for medical citation databases including Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and IranMedex. Besides manual search of the databases that record randomized clinical trials, conference proceedings, and journals related to asthma were included. Studies were evaluated by two independent people based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the common outcomes of studies were entered into the RevMan 5.0.1 software, after evaluation of studies and extraction of data from them; and in cases where there were homogeneous studies, meta-analysis was performed, and for heterogeneous studies, the results were reported qualitatively. RESULTS: Of the 1539 studies initially found, 13 were included in the study. According to the meta-analysis conducted, no significant difference was found between the inhalation of formoterol 12 μg and salmeterol 50 μg in the two outcomes of mean forced expiratory volume 1 s (FEV1), 12 h after inhalation of medication and Borg score (A frequently used scale for quantifying breathlessness) after inhalation of medication. In addition, salmeterol was more effective than formoterol in the two outcomes of percent decrease in FEV1 after inhalation of methacholine and the number of days without an attack. Since the two outcomes of FEV1 30-60 min after inhalation of medication and morning peak expiratory flow after inhalation of medication were heterogeneous, they had no meta-analysis capabilities, and its results were reported qualitatively. CONCLUSION: The data from included studies shows that, more efficacy has been achieved with Salmeterol, especially in some outcomes such as the percent decrease in FEV1 after inhalation of Methacholine, and the number of days without an attack; and therefore, the administration of Salmeterol seems to be beneficial for patients, compared with Formoterol. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4590204/ /pubmed/26487878 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Velayati, Ashraf
Hosseini, Seyed Alireza
Sari, Ali Akbari
Mohtasham, Farideh
Ghanei, Mostafa
Yaghoubi, Mohsen
Majdzadeh, Reza
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4590204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26487878
work_keys_str_mv AT velayatiashraf comparisonoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofformoterolversussalmeterolinthetreatmentofpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hosseiniseyedalireza comparisonoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofformoterolversussalmeterolinthetreatmentofpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sarialiakbari comparisonoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofformoterolversussalmeterolinthetreatmentofpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohtashamfarideh comparisonoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofformoterolversussalmeterolinthetreatmentofpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ghaneimostafa comparisonoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofformoterolversussalmeterolinthetreatmentofpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yaghoubimohsen comparisonoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofformoterolversussalmeterolinthetreatmentofpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT majdzadehreza comparisonoftheeffectivenessandsafetyofformoterolversussalmeterolinthetreatmentofpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis