Cargando…

A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Angulated fractures of the distal forearm are very frequent lesions in childhood. Currently, there are no standard guidelines on whether these children should be treated conservatively with a cast; with reduction and a cast; or with reduction, pinning and a cast under anesthesia. Minor p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adrian, Miriam, Wachtlin, Daniel, Kronfeld, Kai, Sommerfeldt, Dirk, Wessel, Lucas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4590691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0912-x
_version_ 1782392961536884736
author Adrian, Miriam
Wachtlin, Daniel
Kronfeld, Kai
Sommerfeldt, Dirk
Wessel, Lucas M.
author_facet Adrian, Miriam
Wachtlin, Daniel
Kronfeld, Kai
Sommerfeldt, Dirk
Wessel, Lucas M.
author_sort Adrian, Miriam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Angulated fractures of the distal forearm are very frequent lesions in childhood. Currently, there are no standard guidelines on whether these children should be treated conservatively with a cast; with reduction and a cast; or with reduction, pinning and a cast under anesthesia. Minor prospective and retrospective studies have shown that the distal physis of the forearm possesses high remodeling capacity leading to reliable correction of malalignment. The aim of this trial is to answer the question about whether operative and conservative treatment show equivocal results. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, multinational, multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded, actively controlled, parallel group trial, with 24 months of observation. The primary objective of this trial is to assess whether or not the long-term functional outcome in remodeling patients is inferior to patients receiving closed reduction and K-wire pinning. The trial should include 742 patients with acute fracture. The patients will be included in 30 medical centers in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. All patients 5 to 11 years of age presenting at the emergency department with an angulated distal fracture of the forearm will be randomized online after informed consent. The primary endpoint is the Cooney Score after 24 months. The secondary endpoint is the grade of radiological displacement at 12/24 months. DISCUSSION: Therapy of angulated fractures is a matter of intensive debate. Primary manipulation and pinning under general anesthesia is recommended in order to avoid malalignment. No major study has proven the advantage of manipulation and pinning over immobilization alone. Should remodeling appear to be a safe alternative, manipulation under general anesthesia, K-wire pinning and removal of pins could be avoided, thus sparing significant costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00004874, 30 October 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4590691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45906912015-10-02 A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Adrian, Miriam Wachtlin, Daniel Kronfeld, Kai Sommerfeldt, Dirk Wessel, Lucas M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Angulated fractures of the distal forearm are very frequent lesions in childhood. Currently, there are no standard guidelines on whether these children should be treated conservatively with a cast; with reduction and a cast; or with reduction, pinning and a cast under anesthesia. Minor prospective and retrospective studies have shown that the distal physis of the forearm possesses high remodeling capacity leading to reliable correction of malalignment. The aim of this trial is to answer the question about whether operative and conservative treatment show equivocal results. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, multinational, multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded, actively controlled, parallel group trial, with 24 months of observation. The primary objective of this trial is to assess whether or not the long-term functional outcome in remodeling patients is inferior to patients receiving closed reduction and K-wire pinning. The trial should include 742 patients with acute fracture. The patients will be included in 30 medical centers in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. All patients 5 to 11 years of age presenting at the emergency department with an angulated distal fracture of the forearm will be randomized online after informed consent. The primary endpoint is the Cooney Score after 24 months. The secondary endpoint is the grade of radiological displacement at 12/24 months. DISCUSSION: Therapy of angulated fractures is a matter of intensive debate. Primary manipulation and pinning under general anesthesia is recommended in order to avoid malalignment. No major study has proven the advantage of manipulation and pinning over immobilization alone. Should remodeling appear to be a safe alternative, manipulation under general anesthesia, K-wire pinning and removal of pins could be avoided, thus sparing significant costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00004874, 30 October 2013. BioMed Central 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4590691/ /pubmed/26424510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0912-x Text en © Adrian et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Adrian, Miriam
Wachtlin, Daniel
Kronfeld, Kai
Sommerfeldt, Dirk
Wessel, Lucas M.
A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (afic): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4590691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0912-x
work_keys_str_mv AT adrianmiriam acomparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wachtlindaniel acomparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kronfeldkai acomparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sommerfeldtdirk acomparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wessellucasm acomparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT adrianmiriam comparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wachtlindaniel comparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kronfeldkai comparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sommerfeldtdirk comparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wessellucasm comparisonofinterventionandconservativetreatmentforangulatedfracturesofthedistalforearminchildrenaficstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial