Cargando…
Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help?
Noninvasive approaches for assessment of liver histology include routine laboratory tests and radiological evaluation. The purpose of our study was to determine the utility of a simplified scoring system based on routinely evaluated ultrasound features for the evaluation of chronic liver disease and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4590937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/326231 |
_version_ | 1782393013124726784 |
---|---|
author | Afzal, Shaista Masroor, Imrana Beg, Madiha |
author_facet | Afzal, Shaista Masroor, Imrana Beg, Madiha |
author_sort | Afzal, Shaista |
collection | PubMed |
description | Noninvasive approaches for assessment of liver histology include routine laboratory tests and radiological evaluation. The purpose of our study was to determine the utility of a simplified scoring system based on routinely evaluated ultrasound features for the evaluation of chronic liver disease and correlate it with the histological findings. For this cross-sectional analytical study the data was collected prospectively by nonprobability purposive sampling technique. The ultrasound variables/parameters and their assigned scoring system that was a modified version adopted from published literature were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the liver morphological score and combined score of liver morphology and sizes was determined using stage and grade as reference standard. Our results show a high sensitivity and PPV of liver morphological sonographic evaluation for the staging and grading of CLD respectively thus supporting it as a screening diagnostic strategy. Of the three liver morphology variables, specificity of liver surface evaluation was highest for the stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation. The simplified ultrasound scoring system evaluated in our study is clinically relevant and reproducible for differentiating patients with CLD with mild or no fibrosis from moderate to severe fibrosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4590937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45909372015-10-13 Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help? Afzal, Shaista Masroor, Imrana Beg, Madiha Int J Chronic Dis Research Article Noninvasive approaches for assessment of liver histology include routine laboratory tests and radiological evaluation. The purpose of our study was to determine the utility of a simplified scoring system based on routinely evaluated ultrasound features for the evaluation of chronic liver disease and correlate it with the histological findings. For this cross-sectional analytical study the data was collected prospectively by nonprobability purposive sampling technique. The ultrasound variables/parameters and their assigned scoring system that was a modified version adopted from published literature were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the liver morphological score and combined score of liver morphology and sizes was determined using stage and grade as reference standard. Our results show a high sensitivity and PPV of liver morphological sonographic evaluation for the staging and grading of CLD respectively thus supporting it as a screening diagnostic strategy. Of the three liver morphology variables, specificity of liver surface evaluation was highest for the stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation. The simplified ultrasound scoring system evaluated in our study is clinically relevant and reproducible for differentiating patients with CLD with mild or no fibrosis from moderate to severe fibrosis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4590937/ /pubmed/26464843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/326231 Text en Copyright © 2013 Shaista Afzal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Afzal, Shaista Masroor, Imrana Beg, Madiha Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help? |
title | Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help? |
title_full | Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help? |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help? |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help? |
title_short | Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help? |
title_sort | evaluation of chronic liver disease: does ultrasound scoring criteria help? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4590937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/326231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT afzalshaista evaluationofchronicliverdiseasedoesultrasoundscoringcriteriahelp AT masroorimrana evaluationofchronicliverdiseasedoesultrasoundscoringcriteriahelp AT begmadiha evaluationofchronicliverdiseasedoesultrasoundscoringcriteriahelp |