Cargando…

Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: “Probable active syphilis,” is defined as seroreactivity in both non-treponemal and treponemal tests. A correction factor of 65%, namely the proportion of pregnant women reactive in one syphilis test type that were likely reactive in the second, was applied to reported syphilis seroposit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ham, D. Cal, Lin, Carol, Newman, Lori, Wijesooriya, N. Saman, Kamb, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4591031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25963909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.012
_version_ 1782393026025357312
author Ham, D. Cal
Lin, Carol
Newman, Lori
Wijesooriya, N. Saman
Kamb, Mary
author_facet Ham, D. Cal
Lin, Carol
Newman, Lori
Wijesooriya, N. Saman
Kamb, Mary
author_sort Ham, D. Cal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: “Probable active syphilis,” is defined as seroreactivity in both non-treponemal and treponemal tests. A correction factor of 65%, namely the proportion of pregnant women reactive in one syphilis test type that were likely reactive in the second, was applied to reported syphilis seropositivity data reported to WHO for global estimates of syphilis during pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: To identify more accurate correction factors based on test type reported. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline search using: “Syphilis [Mesh] and Pregnancy [Mesh],” “Syphilis [Mesh] and Prenatal Diagnosis [Mesh],” and “Syphilis [Mesh] and Antenatal [Keyword]. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies must have reported results for pregnant or puerperal women for both non-treponemal and treponemal serology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We manually calculated the crude percent estimates of subjects with both reactive treponemal and reactive non-treponemal tests among subjects with reactive treponemal and among subjects with reactive non-treponemal tests. We summarized the percent estimates using random effects models. MAIN RESULTS: Countries reporting both reactive non-treponemal and reactive treponemal testing required no correction factor. Countries reporting non-treponemal testing or treponemal testing alone required a correction factor of 52.2% and 53.6%, respectively. Countries not reporting test type required a correction factor of 68.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Future estimates should adjust reported maternal syphilis seropositivity by test type to ensure accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4591031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45910312016-06-01 Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ham, D. Cal Lin, Carol Newman, Lori Wijesooriya, N. Saman Kamb, Mary Int J Gynaecol Obstet Article BACKGROUND: “Probable active syphilis,” is defined as seroreactivity in both non-treponemal and treponemal tests. A correction factor of 65%, namely the proportion of pregnant women reactive in one syphilis test type that were likely reactive in the second, was applied to reported syphilis seropositivity data reported to WHO for global estimates of syphilis during pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: To identify more accurate correction factors based on test type reported. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline search using: “Syphilis [Mesh] and Pregnancy [Mesh],” “Syphilis [Mesh] and Prenatal Diagnosis [Mesh],” and “Syphilis [Mesh] and Antenatal [Keyword]. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies must have reported results for pregnant or puerperal women for both non-treponemal and treponemal serology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We manually calculated the crude percent estimates of subjects with both reactive treponemal and reactive non-treponemal tests among subjects with reactive treponemal and among subjects with reactive non-treponemal tests. We summarized the percent estimates using random effects models. MAIN RESULTS: Countries reporting both reactive non-treponemal and reactive treponemal testing required no correction factor. Countries reporting non-treponemal testing or treponemal testing alone required a correction factor of 52.2% and 53.6%, respectively. Countries not reporting test type required a correction factor of 68.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Future estimates should adjust reported maternal syphilis seropositivity by test type to ensure accuracy. 2015-04-25 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4591031/ /pubmed/25963909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.012 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ham, D. Cal
Lin, Carol
Newman, Lori
Wijesooriya, N. Saman
Kamb, Mary
Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort improving global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy by diagnostic test type: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4591031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25963909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.012
work_keys_str_mv AT hamdcal improvingglobalestimatesofsyphilisinpregnancybydiagnostictesttypeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lincarol improvingglobalestimatesofsyphilisinpregnancybydiagnostictesttypeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT newmanlori improvingglobalestimatesofsyphilisinpregnancybydiagnostictesttypeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wijesooriyansaman improvingglobalestimatesofsyphilisinpregnancybydiagnostictesttypeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kambmary improvingglobalestimatesofsyphilisinpregnancybydiagnostictesttypeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis