Cargando…

Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective patient review of clinical and radiological outcomes of microsurgical posterior lumbar interbody fusion and decompression, without posterior instrumentation, for the treatment of lateral recess stenosis. PURPOSE: This study documented the clinical and rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demirayak, Mehmet, Şişman, Lokman, Türkmen, Faik, Efe, Duran, Pekince, Oğuzhan, Göncü, Recep Gani, Sever, Cem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4591442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26435789
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.713
_version_ 1782393076467105792
author Demirayak, Mehmet
Şişman, Lokman
Türkmen, Faik
Efe, Duran
Pekince, Oğuzhan
Göncü, Recep Gani
Sever, Cem
author_facet Demirayak, Mehmet
Şişman, Lokman
Türkmen, Faik
Efe, Duran
Pekince, Oğuzhan
Göncü, Recep Gani
Sever, Cem
author_sort Demirayak, Mehmet
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective patient review of clinical and radiological outcomes of microsurgical posterior lumbar interbody fusion and decompression, without posterior instrumentation, for the treatment of lateral recess stenosis. PURPOSE: This study documented the clinical and radiological results of microsurgical posterior lumbar interbody fusion and decompression of the lateral recess using interbody cages without posterior instrumentation for the treatment of lateral recess stenosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although microsurgery has some advantages, various complications have been reported following microsurgical decompression, including cage migration, pseudoarthrosis, neurologic deficits, and persistent pain. METHODS: A total of 34 patients (13 men, 21 women), with a mean age of 56.65±9.1 years (range, 40-77 years) confirmed spinal stability, and preoperative radiological findings of lateral recess stenosis, were included in the study. Interbody polyetheretherketone cages and auto grafts were used in all patients. Posterior instrumentation was not used because of limited resection of the posterior lumbar structures. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging were assessed and compared to images taken at the final follow-up. Functional recovery was also evaluated according to the Macnab criteria at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 35.05±8.65 months (range, 24-46 months). The clinical results, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of hospital stay were similar to previously published results; the fusion rate (85.2%) was decreased and the migration rate (5.8%) was increased, compared with prior reports. CONCLUSIONS: Although microsurgery has some advantages, migration and pseudoarthrosis remain challenges to achieving adequate lumbar interbody fusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4591442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45914422015-10-04 Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis Demirayak, Mehmet Şişman, Lokman Türkmen, Faik Efe, Duran Pekince, Oğuzhan Göncü, Recep Gani Sever, Cem Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective patient review of clinical and radiological outcomes of microsurgical posterior lumbar interbody fusion and decompression, without posterior instrumentation, for the treatment of lateral recess stenosis. PURPOSE: This study documented the clinical and radiological results of microsurgical posterior lumbar interbody fusion and decompression of the lateral recess using interbody cages without posterior instrumentation for the treatment of lateral recess stenosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although microsurgery has some advantages, various complications have been reported following microsurgical decompression, including cage migration, pseudoarthrosis, neurologic deficits, and persistent pain. METHODS: A total of 34 patients (13 men, 21 women), with a mean age of 56.65±9.1 years (range, 40-77 years) confirmed spinal stability, and preoperative radiological findings of lateral recess stenosis, were included in the study. Interbody polyetheretherketone cages and auto grafts were used in all patients. Posterior instrumentation was not used because of limited resection of the posterior lumbar structures. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging were assessed and compared to images taken at the final follow-up. Functional recovery was also evaluated according to the Macnab criteria at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 35.05±8.65 months (range, 24-46 months). The clinical results, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of hospital stay were similar to previously published results; the fusion rate (85.2%) was decreased and the migration rate (5.8%) was increased, compared with prior reports. CONCLUSIONS: Although microsurgery has some advantages, migration and pseudoarthrosis remain challenges to achieving adequate lumbar interbody fusion. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2015-10 2015-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4591442/ /pubmed/26435789 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.713 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Demirayak, Mehmet
Şişman, Lokman
Türkmen, Faik
Efe, Duran
Pekince, Oğuzhan
Göncü, Recep Gani
Sever, Cem
Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis
title Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis
title_full Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis
title_fullStr Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis
title_short Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis
title_sort clinical and radiological results of microsurgical posterior lumbar interbody fusion and decompression without posterior instrumentation for lateral recess stenosis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4591442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26435789
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.713
work_keys_str_mv AT demirayakmehmet clinicalandradiologicalresultsofmicrosurgicalposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanddecompressionwithoutposteriorinstrumentationforlateralrecessstenosis
AT sismanlokman clinicalandradiologicalresultsofmicrosurgicalposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanddecompressionwithoutposteriorinstrumentationforlateralrecessstenosis
AT turkmenfaik clinicalandradiologicalresultsofmicrosurgicalposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanddecompressionwithoutposteriorinstrumentationforlateralrecessstenosis
AT efeduran clinicalandradiologicalresultsofmicrosurgicalposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanddecompressionwithoutposteriorinstrumentationforlateralrecessstenosis
AT pekinceoguzhan clinicalandradiologicalresultsofmicrosurgicalposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanddecompressionwithoutposteriorinstrumentationforlateralrecessstenosis
AT goncurecepgani clinicalandradiologicalresultsofmicrosurgicalposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanddecompressionwithoutposteriorinstrumentationforlateralrecessstenosis
AT severcem clinicalandradiologicalresultsofmicrosurgicalposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanddecompressionwithoutposteriorinstrumentationforlateralrecessstenosis