Cargando…
Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial
PURPOSE: Interactive multimedia’s potential to improve biobank informed consent has yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to test the separate effectiveness of interactivity and multimedia at improving participant understanding and confidence of understanding of informed consent, compare...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.33 |
_version_ | 1782393193516498944 |
---|---|
author | Simon, Christian M. Klein, David W. Schartz, Helen A. |
author_facet | Simon, Christian M. Klein, David W. Schartz, Helen A. |
author_sort | Simon, Christian M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Interactive multimedia’s potential to improve biobank informed consent has yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to test the separate effectiveness of interactivity and multimedia at improving participant understanding and confidence of understanding of informed consent, compared to a standard, face-to-face (F2F) biobank consent process. METHODS: A 2 (F2F versus multimedia) × 2 (standard versus enhanced interactivity) experimental design was used with 200 patients randomly assigned to receive informed consent. All patients received the same information provided in the Biobank’s 9-page consent document. RESULTS: Interactivity (F(1,196)=7.56, p=0.007, partial η(2)=0.037) and Media (F(1,196)=4.27, p=0.04, partial η(2)=0.021) independently improved participants’ understanding of the Biobank consent. Interactivity (F(1,196) = 6.793, p = 0.01, partial η(2)=0.033), but not Media (F(1,196) = 0.455, n.s.), resulted in increased participant confidence in their understanding of the Biobank’s consent. Patients took more time to complete the multimedia (M=18.2 min.) than the F2F (M=12.6 min.) conditions. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that interactivity and multimedia each can be effective at promoting individuals’ understanding and confidence in understanding of a biobank consent, albeit with additional time investment. Researchers should not assume that multimedia is inherently interactive, but rather separate the two constructs when studying electronic consent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4592360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45923602016-05-18 Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial Simon, Christian M. Klein, David W. Schartz, Helen A. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Interactive multimedia’s potential to improve biobank informed consent has yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to test the separate effectiveness of interactivity and multimedia at improving participant understanding and confidence of understanding of informed consent, compared to a standard, face-to-face (F2F) biobank consent process. METHODS: A 2 (F2F versus multimedia) × 2 (standard versus enhanced interactivity) experimental design was used with 200 patients randomly assigned to receive informed consent. All patients received the same information provided in the Biobank’s 9-page consent document. RESULTS: Interactivity (F(1,196)=7.56, p=0.007, partial η(2)=0.037) and Media (F(1,196)=4.27, p=0.04, partial η(2)=0.021) independently improved participants’ understanding of the Biobank consent. Interactivity (F(1,196) = 6.793, p = 0.01, partial η(2)=0.033), but not Media (F(1,196) = 0.455, n.s.), resulted in increased participant confidence in their understanding of the Biobank’s consent. Patients took more time to complete the multimedia (M=18.2 min.) than the F2F (M=12.6 min.) conditions. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that interactivity and multimedia each can be effective at promoting individuals’ understanding and confidence in understanding of a biobank consent, albeit with additional time investment. Researchers should not assume that multimedia is inherently interactive, but rather separate the two constructs when studying electronic consent. 2015-04-02 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4592360/ /pubmed/25834945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.33 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Simon, Christian M. Klein, David W. Schartz, Helen A. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial |
title | Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial |
title_full | Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial |
title_short | Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial |
title_sort | interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.33 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonchristianm interactivemultimediaconsentforbiobankingarandomizedtrial AT kleindavidw interactivemultimediaconsentforbiobankingarandomizedtrial AT schartzhelena interactivemultimediaconsentforbiobankingarandomizedtrial |