Cargando…

Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)

We investigated intraspecific aggression in experimental nests (expN(1), expN(2)) of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata in Chitwan (Nepal), focusing on interactions between surface bees and two other groups of bees approaching the nest: (1) homing “nestmate” foragers landing on the bee curtain remaine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weihmann, Frank, Waddoup, Dominique, Hötzl, Thomas, Kastberger, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects5030689
_version_ 1782393211914813440
author Weihmann, Frank
Waddoup, Dominique
Hötzl, Thomas
Kastberger, Gerald
author_facet Weihmann, Frank
Waddoup, Dominique
Hötzl, Thomas
Kastberger, Gerald
author_sort Weihmann, Frank
collection PubMed
description We investigated intraspecific aggression in experimental nests (expN(1), expN(2)) of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata in Chitwan (Nepal), focusing on interactions between surface bees and two other groups of bees approaching the nest: (1) homing “nestmate” foragers landing on the bee curtain remained unmolested by guards; and (2) supposed “non-nestmate” bees, which were identified by their erratic flight patterns in front of the nest, such as hovering or sideways scanning and splaying their legs from their body, and were promptly attacked by the surface bees after landing. These supposed non-nestmate bees only occurred immediately before and after migration swarms, which had arrived in close vicinity (and were most likely scouting for a nesting site). In total, 231 of the “nestmate” foragers (fb) and 102 approaches of such purported “non-nestmate” scouts (sc) were analysed (total observation time expN(1): 5.43 min) regarding the evocation of shimmering waves (sh). During their landing the “nestmate” foragers provoked less shimmering waves ((rel)n(sh)[fb] = 23/231 = 0.0996, (rel)n(sh)[sc] = 75/102 = 0.7353; p <0.001, χ(2)-test) with shorter duration (D(sh)[fb] = 197 ± 17 ms, D(sh)[sc] = 488 ± 16 ms; p <0.001; t-test) than “non-nestmates”. Moreover, after having landed on the nest surface, the “non-nestmates” were attacked by the surface bees (expN(1), expN(2): observation time >18 min) quite similarly to the defensive response against predatory wasps. Hence, the surface members of settled colonies respond differently to individual giant honey bees approaching the nest, depending on whether erratic flight patterns are displayed or not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4592578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45925782015-10-08 Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) Weihmann, Frank Waddoup, Dominique Hötzl, Thomas Kastberger, Gerald Insects Article We investigated intraspecific aggression in experimental nests (expN(1), expN(2)) of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata in Chitwan (Nepal), focusing on interactions between surface bees and two other groups of bees approaching the nest: (1) homing “nestmate” foragers landing on the bee curtain remained unmolested by guards; and (2) supposed “non-nestmate” bees, which were identified by their erratic flight patterns in front of the nest, such as hovering or sideways scanning and splaying their legs from their body, and were promptly attacked by the surface bees after landing. These supposed non-nestmate bees only occurred immediately before and after migration swarms, which had arrived in close vicinity (and were most likely scouting for a nesting site). In total, 231 of the “nestmate” foragers (fb) and 102 approaches of such purported “non-nestmate” scouts (sc) were analysed (total observation time expN(1): 5.43 min) regarding the evocation of shimmering waves (sh). During their landing the “nestmate” foragers provoked less shimmering waves ((rel)n(sh)[fb] = 23/231 = 0.0996, (rel)n(sh)[sc] = 75/102 = 0.7353; p <0.001, χ(2)-test) with shorter duration (D(sh)[fb] = 197 ± 17 ms, D(sh)[sc] = 488 ± 16 ms; p <0.001; t-test) than “non-nestmates”. Moreover, after having landed on the nest surface, the “non-nestmates” were attacked by the surface bees (expN(1), expN(2): observation time >18 min) quite similarly to the defensive response against predatory wasps. Hence, the surface members of settled colonies respond differently to individual giant honey bees approaching the nest, depending on whether erratic flight patterns are displayed or not. MDPI 2014-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4592578/ /pubmed/26462834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects5030689 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Weihmann, Frank
Waddoup, Dominique
Hötzl, Thomas
Kastberger, Gerald
Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_full Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_fullStr Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_full_unstemmed Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_short Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_sort intraspecific aggression in giant honey bees (apis dorsata)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects5030689
work_keys_str_mv AT weihmannfrank intraspecificaggressioningianthoneybeesapisdorsata
AT waddoupdominique intraspecificaggressioningianthoneybeesapisdorsata
AT hotzlthomas intraspecificaggressioningianthoneybeesapisdorsata
AT kastbergergerald intraspecificaggressioningianthoneybeesapisdorsata