Cargando…
Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
We investigated intraspecific aggression in experimental nests (expN(1), expN(2)) of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata in Chitwan (Nepal), focusing on interactions between surface bees and two other groups of bees approaching the nest: (1) homing “nestmate” foragers landing on the bee curtain remaine...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects5030689 |
_version_ | 1782393211914813440 |
---|---|
author | Weihmann, Frank Waddoup, Dominique Hötzl, Thomas Kastberger, Gerald |
author_facet | Weihmann, Frank Waddoup, Dominique Hötzl, Thomas Kastberger, Gerald |
author_sort | Weihmann, Frank |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated intraspecific aggression in experimental nests (expN(1), expN(2)) of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata in Chitwan (Nepal), focusing on interactions between surface bees and two other groups of bees approaching the nest: (1) homing “nestmate” foragers landing on the bee curtain remained unmolested by guards; and (2) supposed “non-nestmate” bees, which were identified by their erratic flight patterns in front of the nest, such as hovering or sideways scanning and splaying their legs from their body, and were promptly attacked by the surface bees after landing. These supposed non-nestmate bees only occurred immediately before and after migration swarms, which had arrived in close vicinity (and were most likely scouting for a nesting site). In total, 231 of the “nestmate” foragers (fb) and 102 approaches of such purported “non-nestmate” scouts (sc) were analysed (total observation time expN(1): 5.43 min) regarding the evocation of shimmering waves (sh). During their landing the “nestmate” foragers provoked less shimmering waves ((rel)n(sh)[fb] = 23/231 = 0.0996, (rel)n(sh)[sc] = 75/102 = 0.7353; p <0.001, χ(2)-test) with shorter duration (D(sh)[fb] = 197 ± 17 ms, D(sh)[sc] = 488 ± 16 ms; p <0.001; t-test) than “non-nestmates”. Moreover, after having landed on the nest surface, the “non-nestmates” were attacked by the surface bees (expN(1), expN(2): observation time >18 min) quite similarly to the defensive response against predatory wasps. Hence, the surface members of settled colonies respond differently to individual giant honey bees approaching the nest, depending on whether erratic flight patterns are displayed or not. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4592578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45925782015-10-08 Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) Weihmann, Frank Waddoup, Dominique Hötzl, Thomas Kastberger, Gerald Insects Article We investigated intraspecific aggression in experimental nests (expN(1), expN(2)) of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata in Chitwan (Nepal), focusing on interactions between surface bees and two other groups of bees approaching the nest: (1) homing “nestmate” foragers landing on the bee curtain remained unmolested by guards; and (2) supposed “non-nestmate” bees, which were identified by their erratic flight patterns in front of the nest, such as hovering or sideways scanning and splaying their legs from their body, and were promptly attacked by the surface bees after landing. These supposed non-nestmate bees only occurred immediately before and after migration swarms, which had arrived in close vicinity (and were most likely scouting for a nesting site). In total, 231 of the “nestmate” foragers (fb) and 102 approaches of such purported “non-nestmate” scouts (sc) were analysed (total observation time expN(1): 5.43 min) regarding the evocation of shimmering waves (sh). During their landing the “nestmate” foragers provoked less shimmering waves ((rel)n(sh)[fb] = 23/231 = 0.0996, (rel)n(sh)[sc] = 75/102 = 0.7353; p <0.001, χ(2)-test) with shorter duration (D(sh)[fb] = 197 ± 17 ms, D(sh)[sc] = 488 ± 16 ms; p <0.001; t-test) than “non-nestmates”. Moreover, after having landed on the nest surface, the “non-nestmates” were attacked by the surface bees (expN(1), expN(2): observation time >18 min) quite similarly to the defensive response against predatory wasps. Hence, the surface members of settled colonies respond differently to individual giant honey bees approaching the nest, depending on whether erratic flight patterns are displayed or not. MDPI 2014-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4592578/ /pubmed/26462834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects5030689 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Weihmann, Frank Waddoup, Dominique Hötzl, Thomas Kastberger, Gerald Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) |
title | Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) |
title_full | Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) |
title_fullStr | Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) |
title_short | Intraspecific Aggression in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) |
title_sort | intraspecific aggression in giant honey bees (apis dorsata) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects5030689 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weihmannfrank intraspecificaggressioningianthoneybeesapisdorsata AT waddoupdominique intraspecificaggressioningianthoneybeesapisdorsata AT hotzlthomas intraspecificaggressioningianthoneybeesapisdorsata AT kastbergergerald intraspecificaggressioningianthoneybeesapisdorsata |