Cargando…

Utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation

BACKGROUND: The utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 to identify aortic wall inflammation associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development was assessed. METHODS: Utilizing the porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) perfusion model, abdominal aortas of male Sprague-Dawley rats were infused wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: English, Sean J, Diaz, Jose A, Shao, Xia, Gordon, David, Bevard, Melissa, Su, Gang, Henke, Peter K, Rogers, Virginia E, Upchurch, Gilbert R, Piert, Morand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26055934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-014-0020-z
_version_ 1782393271593467904
author English, Sean J
Diaz, Jose A
Shao, Xia
Gordon, David
Bevard, Melissa
Su, Gang
Henke, Peter K
Rogers, Virginia E
Upchurch, Gilbert R
Piert, Morand
author_facet English, Sean J
Diaz, Jose A
Shao, Xia
Gordon, David
Bevard, Melissa
Su, Gang
Henke, Peter K
Rogers, Virginia E
Upchurch, Gilbert R
Piert, Morand
author_sort English, Sean J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 to identify aortic wall inflammation associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development was assessed. METHODS: Utilizing the porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) perfusion model, abdominal aortas of male Sprague-Dawley rats were infused with active PPE (APPE, AAA; N = 24) or heat-inactivated PPE (IPPE, controls; N = 16). Aortic diameter increases were monitored by ultrasound (US). Three, 7, and 14 days after induction, APPE and IPPE rats were imaged using (18) F-FDG microPET (approximately 37 MBq IV) and compared with (18) F-FDG autoradiography (approximately 185 MBq IV) performed at day 14. A subset of APPE (N = 5) and IPPE (N = 6) animals were imaged with both (11)C-PBR28 (approximately 19 MBq IV) and subsequent (18) F-FDG (approximately 37 MBq IV) microPET on the same day 14 days post PPE exposure. In addition, autoradiography of the retroperitoneal torso was performed after (11)C-PBR28 (approximately 1,480 MBq IV) or (18) F-FDG (approximately 185 MBq IV) administration at 14 days post PPE exposure. Aortic wall-to-muscle ratios (AMRs) were determined for microPET and autoradiography. CD68 and translocator protein (TSPO) immunohistochemistry (IHC), as well as TSPO gene expression assays, were performed for validation. RESULTS: Mean 3 (p = 0.009), 7 (p < 0.0001) and 14 (p < 0.0001) days aortic diameter increases were significantly greater for APPE AAAs compared to IPPE controls. No significant differences in (18) F-FDG AMR were determined at days 3 and 7 post PPE exposure; however, at day 14, the mean (18) F-FDG AMR was significantly elevated in APPE AAAs compared to IPPE controls on both microPET (p = 0.0002) and autoradiography (p = 0.02). Similarly, mean (11)C-PBR28 AMR was significantly increased at day 14 in APPE AAAs compared to IPPE controls on both microPET (p = 0.04) and autoradiography (p = 0.02). For APPE AAAs, inhomogeneously increased (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 uptake was noted preferentially at the anterolateral aspect of the AAA. Compared to controls, APPE AAAs demonstrated significantly increased macrophage cell counts by CD68 IHC (p = 0.001) as well as increased TSPO staining (p = 0.004). Mean TSPO gene expression for APPE AAAs was also significantly elevated compared to IPPE controls (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Rat AAA wall inflammation can be visualized using (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET revealing regional differences of radiotracer uptake on microPET and autoradiography. These results support further investigation of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 in the noninvasive assessment of human AAA development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13550-014-0020-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4593011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45930112015-10-09 Utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation English, Sean J Diaz, Jose A Shao, Xia Gordon, David Bevard, Melissa Su, Gang Henke, Peter K Rogers, Virginia E Upchurch, Gilbert R Piert, Morand EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 to identify aortic wall inflammation associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development was assessed. METHODS: Utilizing the porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) perfusion model, abdominal aortas of male Sprague-Dawley rats were infused with active PPE (APPE, AAA; N = 24) or heat-inactivated PPE (IPPE, controls; N = 16). Aortic diameter increases were monitored by ultrasound (US). Three, 7, and 14 days after induction, APPE and IPPE rats were imaged using (18) F-FDG microPET (approximately 37 MBq IV) and compared with (18) F-FDG autoradiography (approximately 185 MBq IV) performed at day 14. A subset of APPE (N = 5) and IPPE (N = 6) animals were imaged with both (11)C-PBR28 (approximately 19 MBq IV) and subsequent (18) F-FDG (approximately 37 MBq IV) microPET on the same day 14 days post PPE exposure. In addition, autoradiography of the retroperitoneal torso was performed after (11)C-PBR28 (approximately 1,480 MBq IV) or (18) F-FDG (approximately 185 MBq IV) administration at 14 days post PPE exposure. Aortic wall-to-muscle ratios (AMRs) were determined for microPET and autoradiography. CD68 and translocator protein (TSPO) immunohistochemistry (IHC), as well as TSPO gene expression assays, were performed for validation. RESULTS: Mean 3 (p = 0.009), 7 (p < 0.0001) and 14 (p < 0.0001) days aortic diameter increases were significantly greater for APPE AAAs compared to IPPE controls. No significant differences in (18) F-FDG AMR were determined at days 3 and 7 post PPE exposure; however, at day 14, the mean (18) F-FDG AMR was significantly elevated in APPE AAAs compared to IPPE controls on both microPET (p = 0.0002) and autoradiography (p = 0.02). Similarly, mean (11)C-PBR28 AMR was significantly increased at day 14 in APPE AAAs compared to IPPE controls on both microPET (p = 0.04) and autoradiography (p = 0.02). For APPE AAAs, inhomogeneously increased (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 uptake was noted preferentially at the anterolateral aspect of the AAA. Compared to controls, APPE AAAs demonstrated significantly increased macrophage cell counts by CD68 IHC (p = 0.001) as well as increased TSPO staining (p = 0.004). Mean TSPO gene expression for APPE AAAs was also significantly elevated compared to IPPE controls (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Rat AAA wall inflammation can be visualized using (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET revealing regional differences of radiotracer uptake on microPET and autoradiography. These results support further investigation of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 in the noninvasive assessment of human AAA development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13550-014-0020-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4593011/ /pubmed/26055934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-014-0020-z Text en © English et al. 2014 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
English, Sean J
Diaz, Jose A
Shao, Xia
Gordon, David
Bevard, Melissa
Su, Gang
Henke, Peter K
Rogers, Virginia E
Upchurch, Gilbert R
Piert, Morand
Utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation
title Utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation
title_full Utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation
title_fullStr Utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation
title_full_unstemmed Utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation
title_short Utility of (18) F-FDG and (11)C-PBR28 microPET for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation
title_sort utility of (18) f-fdg and (11)c-pbr28 micropet for the assessment of rat aortic aneurysm inflammation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26055934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-014-0020-z
work_keys_str_mv AT englishseanj utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT diazjosea utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT shaoxia utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT gordondavid utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT bevardmelissa utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT sugang utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT henkepeterk utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT rogersvirginiae utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT upchurchgilbertr utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation
AT piertmorand utilityof18ffdgand11cpbr28micropetfortheassessmentofrataorticaneurysminflammation