Cargando…

Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Over 70% of all hospital admissions have a peripheral intravenous device (PIV) inserted; however, the failure rate of PIVs is unacceptably high, with up to 69% of these devices failing before treatment is complete. Failure can be due to dislodgement, phlebitis, occlusion/infiltration a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rickard, Claire M, Marsh, Nicole, Webster, Joan, Playford, E Geoffrey, McGrail, Matthew R, Larsen, Emily, Keogh, Samantha, McMillan, David, Whitty, Jennifer A, Choudhury, Md Abu, Dunster, Kimble R, Reynolds, Heather, Marshall, Andrea, Crilly, Julia, Young, Jeanine, Thom, Ogilvie, Gowardman, John, Corley, Amanda, Fraser, John F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26399574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008689
_version_ 1782393285811109888
author Rickard, Claire M
Marsh, Nicole
Webster, Joan
Playford, E Geoffrey
McGrail, Matthew R
Larsen, Emily
Keogh, Samantha
McMillan, David
Whitty, Jennifer A
Choudhury, Md Abu
Dunster, Kimble R
Reynolds, Heather
Marshall, Andrea
Crilly, Julia
Young, Jeanine
Thom, Ogilvie
Gowardman, John
Corley, Amanda
Fraser, John F
author_facet Rickard, Claire M
Marsh, Nicole
Webster, Joan
Playford, E Geoffrey
McGrail, Matthew R
Larsen, Emily
Keogh, Samantha
McMillan, David
Whitty, Jennifer A
Choudhury, Md Abu
Dunster, Kimble R
Reynolds, Heather
Marshall, Andrea
Crilly, Julia
Young, Jeanine
Thom, Ogilvie
Gowardman, John
Corley, Amanda
Fraser, John F
author_sort Rickard, Claire M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over 70% of all hospital admissions have a peripheral intravenous device (PIV) inserted; however, the failure rate of PIVs is unacceptably high, with up to 69% of these devices failing before treatment is complete. Failure can be due to dislodgement, phlebitis, occlusion/infiltration and/or infection. This results in interrupted medical therapy; painful phlebitis and reinsertions; increased hospital length of stay, morbidity and mortality from infections; and wasted medical/nursing time. Appropriate PIV dressing and securement may prevent many cases of PIV failure, but little comparative data exist regarding the efficacy of various PIV dressing and securement methods. This trial will investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of 4 methods of PIV dressing and securement in preventing PIV failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, parallel group, superiority randomised controlled trial with 4 arms, 3 experimental groups (tissue adhesive, bordered polyurethane dressing, sutureless securement device) and 1 control (standard polyurethane dressing) is planned. There will be a 3-year recruitment of 1708 adult patients, with allocation concealment until randomisation by a centralised web-based service. The primary outcome is PIV failure which includes any of: dislodgement, occlusion/infiltration, phlebitis and infection. Secondary outcomes include: types of PIV failure, PIV dwell time, costs, device colonisation, skin colonisation, patient and staff satisfaction. Relative incidence rates of device failure per 100 devices and per 1000 device days with 95% CIs will summarise the impact of each dressing, and test differences between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with log-rank Mantel-Cox test) will compare device failure over time. p Values of <0.05 will be considered significant. Secondary end points will be compared between groups using parametric or non-parametric techniques appropriate to level of measurement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received from Queensland Health (HREC/11/QRCH/152) and Griffith University (NRS/46/11/HREC). Results will be published according to the CONSORT statement and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN); 12611000769987.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4593168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45931682015-10-08 Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial Rickard, Claire M Marsh, Nicole Webster, Joan Playford, E Geoffrey McGrail, Matthew R Larsen, Emily Keogh, Samantha McMillan, David Whitty, Jennifer A Choudhury, Md Abu Dunster, Kimble R Reynolds, Heather Marshall, Andrea Crilly, Julia Young, Jeanine Thom, Ogilvie Gowardman, John Corley, Amanda Fraser, John F BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: Over 70% of all hospital admissions have a peripheral intravenous device (PIV) inserted; however, the failure rate of PIVs is unacceptably high, with up to 69% of these devices failing before treatment is complete. Failure can be due to dislodgement, phlebitis, occlusion/infiltration and/or infection. This results in interrupted medical therapy; painful phlebitis and reinsertions; increased hospital length of stay, morbidity and mortality from infections; and wasted medical/nursing time. Appropriate PIV dressing and securement may prevent many cases of PIV failure, but little comparative data exist regarding the efficacy of various PIV dressing and securement methods. This trial will investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of 4 methods of PIV dressing and securement in preventing PIV failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, parallel group, superiority randomised controlled trial with 4 arms, 3 experimental groups (tissue adhesive, bordered polyurethane dressing, sutureless securement device) and 1 control (standard polyurethane dressing) is planned. There will be a 3-year recruitment of 1708 adult patients, with allocation concealment until randomisation by a centralised web-based service. The primary outcome is PIV failure which includes any of: dislodgement, occlusion/infiltration, phlebitis and infection. Secondary outcomes include: types of PIV failure, PIV dwell time, costs, device colonisation, skin colonisation, patient and staff satisfaction. Relative incidence rates of device failure per 100 devices and per 1000 device days with 95% CIs will summarise the impact of each dressing, and test differences between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with log-rank Mantel-Cox test) will compare device failure over time. p Values of <0.05 will be considered significant. Secondary end points will be compared between groups using parametric or non-parametric techniques appropriate to level of measurement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received from Queensland Health (HREC/11/QRCH/152) and Griffith University (NRS/46/11/HREC). Results will be published according to the CONSORT statement and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN); 12611000769987. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4593168/ /pubmed/26399574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008689 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Rickard, Claire M
Marsh, Nicole
Webster, Joan
Playford, E Geoffrey
McGrail, Matthew R
Larsen, Emily
Keogh, Samantha
McMillan, David
Whitty, Jennifer A
Choudhury, Md Abu
Dunster, Kimble R
Reynolds, Heather
Marshall, Andrea
Crilly, Julia
Young, Jeanine
Thom, Ogilvie
Gowardman, John
Corley, Amanda
Fraser, John F
Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort securing all intravenous devices effectively in hospitalised patients—the save trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26399574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008689
work_keys_str_mv AT rickardclairem securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marshnicole securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT websterjoan securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT playfordegeoffrey securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgrailmatthewr securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT larsenemily securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keoghsamantha securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcmillandavid securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT whittyjennifera securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT choudhurymdabu securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dunsterkimbler securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reynoldsheather securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marshallandrea securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT crillyjulia securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT youngjeanine securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thomogilvie securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gowardmanjohn securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT corleyamanda securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fraserjohnf securingallintravenousdeviceseffectivelyinhospitalisedpatientsthesavetrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial