Cargando…

External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: External quality assessment (EQA) of sputum smear microscopy is essential and indispensable component of any tuberculosis program. This study assessed the EQA of acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy through onsite evaluation, blinded rechecking and panel test. A one year study was co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayana, Desalegn Admassu, Kidanemariam, Zelalem Teklemariam, Tesfaye, Habtamu Mitiku, Milashu, Fitsum Weldegebreal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26437958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1478-0
_version_ 1782393290113417216
author Ayana, Desalegn Admassu
Kidanemariam, Zelalem Teklemariam
Tesfaye, Habtamu Mitiku
Milashu, Fitsum Weldegebreal
author_facet Ayana, Desalegn Admassu
Kidanemariam, Zelalem Teklemariam
Tesfaye, Habtamu Mitiku
Milashu, Fitsum Weldegebreal
author_sort Ayana, Desalegn Admassu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: External quality assessment (EQA) of sputum smear microscopy is essential and indispensable component of any tuberculosis program. This study assessed the EQA of acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy through onsite evaluation, blinded rechecking and panel test. A one year study was conducted on eight health institution laboratories from December 2011 to December 2012. Onsite evaluation, blinded rechecking and panel tests were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and proportions of false readings were calculated. The level of agreement was measured using Kappa (κ) value. RESULTS: Problems observed during onsite evaluation include shortages of materials, disinfectant, and poor storage and working condition. A total of 578 slides were collected for blinded rechecking, of which 102 (17.6 %) were reported as positive by peripheral laboratories. The panel test revealed an overall error of 17 (25.25 %) of which 14 (17.5 %) were minor errors [low false negative 6 (7.5 %) and low false positive 8 (10 %)], and 3 (3.75 %) were major errors (high false positive). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the peripheral laboratories were 83.5, 97.8, 91.7, and 95.7, respectively. The false readings at the peripheral laboratories were 32 (5.5 %). Agreement on reading the slides was observed on 546 (94.5 %) slides (K = 0.84, SE = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of reagents, supplies, favorable working environment and AFB related technical problems were identified in the peripheral laboratories. High false negative error was found to be the predominant major error. A continuous and strong EQA scheme should be implemented to avoid reporting errors and produce quality sputum results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4593188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45931882015-10-06 External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia Ayana, Desalegn Admassu Kidanemariam, Zelalem Teklemariam Tesfaye, Habtamu Mitiku Milashu, Fitsum Weldegebreal BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: External quality assessment (EQA) of sputum smear microscopy is essential and indispensable component of any tuberculosis program. This study assessed the EQA of acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy through onsite evaluation, blinded rechecking and panel test. A one year study was conducted on eight health institution laboratories from December 2011 to December 2012. Onsite evaluation, blinded rechecking and panel tests were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and proportions of false readings were calculated. The level of agreement was measured using Kappa (κ) value. RESULTS: Problems observed during onsite evaluation include shortages of materials, disinfectant, and poor storage and working condition. A total of 578 slides were collected for blinded rechecking, of which 102 (17.6 %) were reported as positive by peripheral laboratories. The panel test revealed an overall error of 17 (25.25 %) of which 14 (17.5 %) were minor errors [low false negative 6 (7.5 %) and low false positive 8 (10 %)], and 3 (3.75 %) were major errors (high false positive). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the peripheral laboratories were 83.5, 97.8, 91.7, and 95.7, respectively. The false readings at the peripheral laboratories were 32 (5.5 %). Agreement on reading the slides was observed on 546 (94.5 %) slides (K = 0.84, SE = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of reagents, supplies, favorable working environment and AFB related technical problems were identified in the peripheral laboratories. High false negative error was found to be the predominant major error. A continuous and strong EQA scheme should be implemented to avoid reporting errors and produce quality sputum results. BioMed Central 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4593188/ /pubmed/26437958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1478-0 Text en © Ayana et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ayana, Desalegn Admassu
Kidanemariam, Zelalem Teklemariam
Tesfaye, Habtamu Mitiku
Milashu, Fitsum Weldegebreal
External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia
title External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia
title_full External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia
title_fullStr External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia
title_short External quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of Ethiopia
title_sort external quality assessment for acid fast bacilli smear microscopy in eastern part of ethiopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26437958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1478-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ayanadesalegnadmassu externalqualityassessmentforacidfastbacillismearmicroscopyineasternpartofethiopia
AT kidanemariamzelalemteklemariam externalqualityassessmentforacidfastbacillismearmicroscopyineasternpartofethiopia
AT tesfayehabtamumitiku externalqualityassessmentforacidfastbacillismearmicroscopyineasternpartofethiopia
AT milashufitsumweldegebreal externalqualityassessmentforacidfastbacillismearmicroscopyineasternpartofethiopia