Cargando…
Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial
INTRODUCTION: Multimodality therapy, including preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME), has effectively reduced local recurrence rates of rectal cancer over the past decade. However, the benefits and risks of the addition of neoadjuvant CRT to surgery need to be eval...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26111932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-015-0024-8 |
_version_ | 1782393306866515968 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Wen-Hua Wang, Fu-Long Lu, Zhen-Hai Pan, Zhi-Zhong Li, Li-Ren Gao, Yuan-Hong Chen, Gong Wu, Xiao-Jun Ding, Pei-Rong Zeng, Zhi-Fan Wan, De-Sen |
author_facet | Fan, Wen-Hua Wang, Fu-Long Lu, Zhen-Hai Pan, Zhi-Zhong Li, Li-Ren Gao, Yuan-Hong Chen, Gong Wu, Xiao-Jun Ding, Pei-Rong Zeng, Zhi-Fan Wan, De-Sen |
author_sort | Fan, Wen-Hua |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Multimodality therapy, including preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME), has effectively reduced local recurrence rates of rectal cancer over the past decade. However, the benefits and risks of the addition of neoadjuvant CRT to surgery need to be evaluated. This study was to compare the efficacy of TME with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) involving XELOX regimen (oxaliplatin plus capecitabine) in Chinese patients with stages II and III mid/low rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to the TME group (TME without preoperative CCRT) or CCRT + TME group (TME with preoperative CCRT). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local and distant recurrence, tumor response to CRT, toxicity, sphincter preservation, and surgical complications. An interim analysis of the potential inferiority of DFS in the CCRT + TME group was planned when the first 180 patients had been followed up for at least 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients in the TME group and 90 patients in the CCRT + TME group were able to be evaluated. The 3-year DFS and OS rates were 86.3 % and 91.5 % in the whole cohort, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates of the TME and CCRT + TME groups were 85.7% and 87.9 % (P = 0.766), respectively, and the 3-year OS rates were 90.7 % and 92.3 % (P = 0.855), respectively. The functional sphincter preservation rates of the TME and CCRT + TME groups were 71.3 % and 70.0 % (P = 0.849), respectively. In the TME group, 16 (17.0 %) patients were proven to have pTNM stage I disease after surgery. In the CCRT + TME group, 32 (35.6 %) patients achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results indicated no significant differences in the DFS, OS, or functional sphincter preservation rates between the TME and CCRT + TME groups. However, preoperative CCRT with XELOX yielded a high pCR rate. Newer techniques are needed to improve the staging accuracy, and further investigation is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chi CTR-TRC-08000122 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4593338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45933382015-10-06 Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial Fan, Wen-Hua Wang, Fu-Long Lu, Zhen-Hai Pan, Zhi-Zhong Li, Li-Ren Gao, Yuan-Hong Chen, Gong Wu, Xiao-Jun Ding, Pei-Rong Zeng, Zhi-Fan Wan, De-Sen Chin J Cancer Original Article INTRODUCTION: Multimodality therapy, including preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME), has effectively reduced local recurrence rates of rectal cancer over the past decade. However, the benefits and risks of the addition of neoadjuvant CRT to surgery need to be evaluated. This study was to compare the efficacy of TME with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) involving XELOX regimen (oxaliplatin plus capecitabine) in Chinese patients with stages II and III mid/low rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to the TME group (TME without preoperative CCRT) or CCRT + TME group (TME with preoperative CCRT). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local and distant recurrence, tumor response to CRT, toxicity, sphincter preservation, and surgical complications. An interim analysis of the potential inferiority of DFS in the CCRT + TME group was planned when the first 180 patients had been followed up for at least 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients in the TME group and 90 patients in the CCRT + TME group were able to be evaluated. The 3-year DFS and OS rates were 86.3 % and 91.5 % in the whole cohort, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates of the TME and CCRT + TME groups were 85.7% and 87.9 % (P = 0.766), respectively, and the 3-year OS rates were 90.7 % and 92.3 % (P = 0.855), respectively. The functional sphincter preservation rates of the TME and CCRT + TME groups were 71.3 % and 70.0 % (P = 0.849), respectively. In the TME group, 16 (17.0 %) patients were proven to have pTNM stage I disease after surgery. In the CCRT + TME group, 32 (35.6 %) patients achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results indicated no significant differences in the DFS, OS, or functional sphincter preservation rates between the TME and CCRT + TME groups. However, preoperative CCRT with XELOX yielded a high pCR rate. Newer techniques are needed to improve the staging accuracy, and further investigation is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chi CTR-TRC-08000122 BioMed Central 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4593338/ /pubmed/26111932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-015-0024-8 Text en © Fan et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fan, Wen-Hua Wang, Fu-Long Lu, Zhen-Hai Pan, Zhi-Zhong Li, Li-Ren Gao, Yuan-Hong Chen, Gong Wu, Xiao-Jun Ding, Pei-Rong Zeng, Zhi-Fan Wan, De-Sen Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial |
title | Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial |
title_full | Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial |
title_short | Surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial |
title_sort | surgery with versus without preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for mid/low rectal cancer: an interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26111932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-015-0024-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanwenhua surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT wangfulong surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT luzhenhai surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT panzhizhong surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT liliren surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT gaoyuanhong surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT chengong surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT wuxiaojun surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT dingpeirong surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT zengzhifan surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial AT wandesen surgerywithversuswithoutpreoperativeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyformidlowrectalcanceraninterimanalysisofaprospectiverandomizedtrial |