Cargando…

Development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, Iranian version

BACKGROUND: The aim was to translate and develop a patient competence (PC) questionnaire in the context of cardiology and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: In total, 148 cardiac patients who have inclusion criteria of the study were completed cardiac PC (CPC) questionnaire. Hospital Anxiet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roohafza, Hamidreza, Sadeghi, Masoumeh, Khani, Azam, Afshar, Hamid, Amirpour, Afshin, Sarrafzadegan, Nizal, Scheidt, Carl Eduard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478729
_version_ 1782393355525685248
author Roohafza, Hamidreza
Sadeghi, Masoumeh
Khani, Azam
Afshar, Hamid
Amirpour, Afshin
Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
Scheidt, Carl Eduard
author_facet Roohafza, Hamidreza
Sadeghi, Masoumeh
Khani, Azam
Afshar, Hamid
Amirpour, Afshin
Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
Scheidt, Carl Eduard
author_sort Roohafza, Hamidreza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim was to translate and develop a patient competence (PC) questionnaire in the context of cardiology and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: In total, 148 cardiac patients who have inclusion criteria of the study were completed cardiac PC (CPC) questionnaire. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and self-administered instrument European quality of life 5-dimensions were used to further validate the CPC questionnaire. The CPC was translated according to the recommended methodology for translating questionnaires, and psychometric properties including internal consistency, factor analysis, discriminant validity, construct validity, and concurrent criterion validity were tested. RESULTS: Five domains in problem-focused task including search for information, self-regulation, being assertive, independent decision-making, and looking for social services, and three domains in emotion-focused task including stress management, confronting the threat, and avoidance were obtained by factor analysis. The standardized Cronbach’s α of all domains were statistically significant (P < 0.001) and internal consistency for all domains was acceptable. Significant intercorrelations of CPC domains also indicated good criterion validity. As there were no cross-loadings, the domains have demonstrated good construct validity and discriminant validity. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the Persian version of the CPC is a reliable and valid questionnaire. Although further improvement of this measure is clearly required, it suggests being a potential basis for investigating the determinants and health effects of CPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4593657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45936572015-10-16 Development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, Iranian version Roohafza, Hamidreza Sadeghi, Masoumeh Khani, Azam Afshar, Hamid Amirpour, Afshin Sarrafzadegan, Nizal Scheidt, Carl Eduard ARYA Atheroscler Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim was to translate and develop a patient competence (PC) questionnaire in the context of cardiology and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: In total, 148 cardiac patients who have inclusion criteria of the study were completed cardiac PC (CPC) questionnaire. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and self-administered instrument European quality of life 5-dimensions were used to further validate the CPC questionnaire. The CPC was translated according to the recommended methodology for translating questionnaires, and psychometric properties including internal consistency, factor analysis, discriminant validity, construct validity, and concurrent criterion validity were tested. RESULTS: Five domains in problem-focused task including search for information, self-regulation, being assertive, independent decision-making, and looking for social services, and three domains in emotion-focused task including stress management, confronting the threat, and avoidance were obtained by factor analysis. The standardized Cronbach’s α of all domains were statistically significant (P < 0.001) and internal consistency for all domains was acceptable. Significant intercorrelations of CPC domains also indicated good criterion validity. As there were no cross-loadings, the domains have demonstrated good construct validity and discriminant validity. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the Persian version of the CPC is a reliable and valid questionnaire. Although further improvement of this measure is clearly required, it suggests being a potential basis for investigating the determinants and health effects of CPC. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4593657/ /pubmed/26478729 Text en © 2015 Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center & Isfahan University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Roohafza, Hamidreza
Sadeghi, Masoumeh
Khani, Azam
Afshar, Hamid
Amirpour, Afshin
Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
Scheidt, Carl Eduard
Development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, Iranian version
title Development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, Iranian version
title_full Development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, Iranian version
title_fullStr Development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, Iranian version
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, Iranian version
title_short Development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, Iranian version
title_sort development and validation of cardiac patient competence questionnaire, iranian version
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478729
work_keys_str_mv AT roohafzahamidreza developmentandvalidationofcardiacpatientcompetencequestionnaireiranianversion
AT sadeghimasoumeh developmentandvalidationofcardiacpatientcompetencequestionnaireiranianversion
AT khaniazam developmentandvalidationofcardiacpatientcompetencequestionnaireiranianversion
AT afsharhamid developmentandvalidationofcardiacpatientcompetencequestionnaireiranianversion
AT amirpourafshin developmentandvalidationofcardiacpatientcompetencequestionnaireiranianversion
AT sarrafzadegannizal developmentandvalidationofcardiacpatientcompetencequestionnaireiranianversion
AT scheidtcarleduard developmentandvalidationofcardiacpatientcompetencequestionnaireiranianversion