Cargando…

Specific Intensity for Peaking: Is Race Pace the Best Option?

BACKGROUND: The peaking period for endurance competition is characterized for a relative increase of the intensity of training, after a longer period of training relatively dominated by lower intensity and higher volume OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to compare physiological and 10 km pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munoz, Iker, Seiler, Stephen, Alcocer, Alberto, Carr, Natasha, Esteve-Lanao, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4594142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448854
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.24900
_version_ 1782393414993575936
author Munoz, Iker
Seiler, Stephen
Alcocer, Alberto
Carr, Natasha
Esteve-Lanao, Jonathan
author_facet Munoz, Iker
Seiler, Stephen
Alcocer, Alberto
Carr, Natasha
Esteve-Lanao, Jonathan
author_sort Munoz, Iker
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The peaking period for endurance competition is characterized for a relative increase of the intensity of training, after a longer period of training relatively dominated by lower intensity and higher volume OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to compare physiological and 10 km performance effects of high intensity training (HIT) versus race pace interval training (RP) during peaking for competition in well-trained runners. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 13 athletes took part in the study, they were divided into two groups: HIT and RP. HIT performed short intervals at ~105% of the maximal aerobic velocity (MAV), while RP trained longer intervals at a speed of ~90% of the MAV (a speed approximating 10 km race pace). After 12 weeks of baseline training, the athletes trained for 6 weeks under one of the two peaking regimes. Subjects performed 10 km prior to and after the intervention period. The total load of training was matched between groups during the treatment phase. Subjects completed a graded treadmill running test until volitional exhaustion prior to each 10 km race. MAV was determined as the minimal velocity eliciting maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2)max). RESULTS: Both groups significantly improved their 10 km time (35 minutes 29 seconds ± 1 minutes 41 seconds vs 34 minutes 53 seconds ± 1 minutes 55 seconds, P < 0.01 for HIT; 35 minutes 27 seconds ± 1 minutes 40 seconds vs 34 minutes 53 seconds ± 1 minutes 18 seconds P < 0.01 for RP). VO(2)max increased after HIT (69 ± 3.6 vs 71.5 ± 4.2 ml.Kg(-1).min(-1), P < 0.05); while it didn’t for RP (68.4 ± 6 vs 69.8 ± 3 ml.Kg(-1).min(-1), p>0.05). In contrast, running economy decreased significantly after HIT (210 ± 6 ml.Kg(-1).km(-1) vs 218 ± 9, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 6 week period of training at either 105% of MAV or 90% of MAV yielded similar performance gains in a 10km race performed at ~90% MAV. Therefore, the physiological impact of HIT training seems to be positive for VO2max but negative for running economy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4594142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45941422015-10-07 Specific Intensity for Peaking: Is Race Pace the Best Option? Munoz, Iker Seiler, Stephen Alcocer, Alberto Carr, Natasha Esteve-Lanao, Jonathan Asian J Sports Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The peaking period for endurance competition is characterized for a relative increase of the intensity of training, after a longer period of training relatively dominated by lower intensity and higher volume OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to compare physiological and 10 km performance effects of high intensity training (HIT) versus race pace interval training (RP) during peaking for competition in well-trained runners. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 13 athletes took part in the study, they were divided into two groups: HIT and RP. HIT performed short intervals at ~105% of the maximal aerobic velocity (MAV), while RP trained longer intervals at a speed of ~90% of the MAV (a speed approximating 10 km race pace). After 12 weeks of baseline training, the athletes trained for 6 weeks under one of the two peaking regimes. Subjects performed 10 km prior to and after the intervention period. The total load of training was matched between groups during the treatment phase. Subjects completed a graded treadmill running test until volitional exhaustion prior to each 10 km race. MAV was determined as the minimal velocity eliciting maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2)max). RESULTS: Both groups significantly improved their 10 km time (35 minutes 29 seconds ± 1 minutes 41 seconds vs 34 minutes 53 seconds ± 1 minutes 55 seconds, P < 0.01 for HIT; 35 minutes 27 seconds ± 1 minutes 40 seconds vs 34 minutes 53 seconds ± 1 minutes 18 seconds P < 0.01 for RP). VO(2)max increased after HIT (69 ± 3.6 vs 71.5 ± 4.2 ml.Kg(-1).min(-1), P < 0.05); while it didn’t for RP (68.4 ± 6 vs 69.8 ± 3 ml.Kg(-1).min(-1), p>0.05). In contrast, running economy decreased significantly after HIT (210 ± 6 ml.Kg(-1).km(-1) vs 218 ± 9, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 6 week period of training at either 105% of MAV or 90% of MAV yielded similar performance gains in a 10km race performed at ~90% MAV. Therefore, the physiological impact of HIT training seems to be positive for VO2max but negative for running economy. Kowsar 2015-09-23 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4594142/ /pubmed/26448854 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.24900 Text en Copyright © 2015, Sports Medicine Research Center. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munoz, Iker
Seiler, Stephen
Alcocer, Alberto
Carr, Natasha
Esteve-Lanao, Jonathan
Specific Intensity for Peaking: Is Race Pace the Best Option?
title Specific Intensity for Peaking: Is Race Pace the Best Option?
title_full Specific Intensity for Peaking: Is Race Pace the Best Option?
title_fullStr Specific Intensity for Peaking: Is Race Pace the Best Option?
title_full_unstemmed Specific Intensity for Peaking: Is Race Pace the Best Option?
title_short Specific Intensity for Peaking: Is Race Pace the Best Option?
title_sort specific intensity for peaking: is race pace the best option?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4594142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448854
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.24900
work_keys_str_mv AT munoziker specificintensityforpeakingisracepacethebestoption
AT seilerstephen specificintensityforpeakingisracepacethebestoption
AT alcoceralberto specificintensityforpeakingisracepacethebestoption
AT carrnatasha specificintensityforpeakingisracepacethebestoption
AT estevelanaojonathan specificintensityforpeakingisracepacethebestoption