Cargando…
Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery
As complex treatment techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) entail the modeling of rounded leaf-end transmission in the treatment planning system, it is important to accurately determine the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) value for a precise calculation of dose. The advancements in th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4594381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500398 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.165072 |
_version_ | 1782393442798665728 |
---|---|
author | Balasingh, S. Timothy Peace Singh, I. Rabi Raja Rafic, K. Mohamathu Babu, S. Ebenezer Suman Ravindran, B. Paul |
author_facet | Balasingh, S. Timothy Peace Singh, I. Rabi Raja Rafic, K. Mohamathu Babu, S. Ebenezer Suman Ravindran, B. Paul |
author_sort | Balasingh, S. Timothy Peace |
collection | PubMed |
description | As complex treatment techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) entail the modeling of rounded leaf-end transmission in the treatment planning system, it is important to accurately determine the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) value for a precise calculation of dose. The advancements in the application of the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in quality assurance (QA) and dosimetry have facilitated the determination of DLG in this study. The DLG measurements were performed using both the ionization chamber (DLG(ion)) and EPID (DLG(EPID)) for sweeping gap fields of different widths. The DLG(ion) values were found to be 1.133 mm and 1.120 mm for perpendicular and parallel orientations of the 0.125 cm(3) ionization chamber, while the corresponding DLG(EPID) values were 0.843 mm and 0.819 mm, respectively. It was found that the DLG was independent of volume and orientation of the ionization chamber, depth, source to surface distance (SSD), and the rate of dose delivery. Since the patient-specific QA tests showed comparable results between the IMRT plans based on the DLG(EPID) and DLG(ion), it is concluded that the EPID can be a suitable alternative in the determination of DLG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4594381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45943812015-10-23 Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery Balasingh, S. Timothy Peace Singh, I. Rabi Raja Rafic, K. Mohamathu Babu, S. Ebenezer Suman Ravindran, B. Paul J Med Phys Original Article As complex treatment techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) entail the modeling of rounded leaf-end transmission in the treatment planning system, it is important to accurately determine the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) value for a precise calculation of dose. The advancements in the application of the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in quality assurance (QA) and dosimetry have facilitated the determination of DLG in this study. The DLG measurements were performed using both the ionization chamber (DLG(ion)) and EPID (DLG(EPID)) for sweeping gap fields of different widths. The DLG(ion) values were found to be 1.133 mm and 1.120 mm for perpendicular and parallel orientations of the 0.125 cm(3) ionization chamber, while the corresponding DLG(EPID) values were 0.843 mm and 0.819 mm, respectively. It was found that the DLG was independent of volume and orientation of the ionization chamber, depth, source to surface distance (SSD), and the rate of dose delivery. Since the patient-specific QA tests showed comparable results between the IMRT plans based on the DLG(EPID) and DLG(ion), it is concluded that the EPID can be a suitable alternative in the determination of DLG. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4594381/ /pubmed/26500398 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.165072 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Balasingh, S. Timothy Peace Singh, I. Rabi Raja Rafic, K. Mohamathu Babu, S. Ebenezer Suman Ravindran, B. Paul Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery |
title | Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery |
title_full | Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery |
title_fullStr | Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery |
title_short | Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery |
title_sort | determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4594381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500398 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.165072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balasinghstimothypeace determinationofdosimetricleafgapusingamorphoussiliconelectronicportalimagingdeviceanditsinfluenceonintensitymodulatedradiotherapydosedelivery AT singhirabiraja determinationofdosimetricleafgapusingamorphoussiliconelectronicportalimagingdeviceanditsinfluenceonintensitymodulatedradiotherapydosedelivery AT rafickmohamathu determinationofdosimetricleafgapusingamorphoussiliconelectronicportalimagingdeviceanditsinfluenceonintensitymodulatedradiotherapydosedelivery AT babusebenezersuman determinationofdosimetricleafgapusingamorphoussiliconelectronicportalimagingdeviceanditsinfluenceonintensitymodulatedradiotherapydosedelivery AT ravindranbpaul determinationofdosimetricleafgapusingamorphoussiliconelectronicportalimagingdeviceanditsinfluenceonintensitymodulatedradiotherapydosedelivery |