Cargando…

Plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in Norway and some other European countries: xenophobic tales or not?

BACKGROUND: In their quest to understand and interpret nature, people have frequently sought religious or divine origins for plant species and their characteristics. Less often, historical events or persons are involved. This study comprises eleven cases of the latter kind, all claiming that plant s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Alm, Torbjørn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0056-9
_version_ 1782393515723980800
author Alm, Torbjørn
author_facet Alm, Torbjørn
author_sort Alm, Torbjørn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In their quest to understand and interpret nature, people have frequently sought religious or divine origins for plant species and their characteristics. Less often, historical events or persons are involved. This study comprises eleven cases of the latter kind, all claiming that plant species have been introduced by foreigners or at least from foreign lands. METHODS: Based on literature data and a few cases recorded during my own ethnobotanical field work, eleven European examples of pseudo-historical plant origins are presented here, including Cakile maritima, Cicuta virosa, Lathyrus japonicus, Leymus arenarius, Primula vulgaris, and Scopolia carniolica in Norway, Heracleum mantegazzianum and/or H. persicum in Denmark, Phoenix dactylifera and P. theophrastii in Greece, and Jacobaea vulgaris in Scotland. RESULTS: The only common trait in these stories is that foreigner or at least foreign lands are claimed as sources of the plant species. In most cases, the “historical” explanations given in folk tradition are demonstrably at odds with reality. In those cases that involve poisonous or potentially harmful species (Cicuta virosa, Heracleum mantegazzianum and/or H. persicum, Jacobaea vulgaris), or the “useless” Phoenix theophrastii, with its inedible fruits, the stories may be interpreted as xenophobic, blaming foreigners for introducing dangerous or worthless species. The remaining examples merely suggest a search for exotic and seemingly rational, if erroneous, origins for plant species and stands that people considered strange and unusual. CONCLUSION: The spreading vectors assumed in folk tradition are correct and well documented, e.g. ship cargos (including goods and packing materials), which are responsible for introducing ballast plants and other anthropochores, and wartime activities, introducing a broad range of species (polemochores). They do not, however, apply to the species included in this study, which are either indigenous plants or introduced ornamentals. The foreigners appearing in the folk tales serve mostly as suitably exotic explanations for what is perceived “alien” plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4595001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45950012015-10-07 Plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in Norway and some other European countries: xenophobic tales or not? Alm, Torbjørn J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Research BACKGROUND: In their quest to understand and interpret nature, people have frequently sought religious or divine origins for plant species and their characteristics. Less often, historical events or persons are involved. This study comprises eleven cases of the latter kind, all claiming that plant species have been introduced by foreigners or at least from foreign lands. METHODS: Based on literature data and a few cases recorded during my own ethnobotanical field work, eleven European examples of pseudo-historical plant origins are presented here, including Cakile maritima, Cicuta virosa, Lathyrus japonicus, Leymus arenarius, Primula vulgaris, and Scopolia carniolica in Norway, Heracleum mantegazzianum and/or H. persicum in Denmark, Phoenix dactylifera and P. theophrastii in Greece, and Jacobaea vulgaris in Scotland. RESULTS: The only common trait in these stories is that foreigner or at least foreign lands are claimed as sources of the plant species. In most cases, the “historical” explanations given in folk tradition are demonstrably at odds with reality. In those cases that involve poisonous or potentially harmful species (Cicuta virosa, Heracleum mantegazzianum and/or H. persicum, Jacobaea vulgaris), or the “useless” Phoenix theophrastii, with its inedible fruits, the stories may be interpreted as xenophobic, blaming foreigners for introducing dangerous or worthless species. The remaining examples merely suggest a search for exotic and seemingly rational, if erroneous, origins for plant species and stands that people considered strange and unusual. CONCLUSION: The spreading vectors assumed in folk tradition are correct and well documented, e.g. ship cargos (including goods and packing materials), which are responsible for introducing ballast plants and other anthropochores, and wartime activities, introducing a broad range of species (polemochores). They do not, however, apply to the species included in this study, which are either indigenous plants or introduced ornamentals. The foreigners appearing in the folk tales serve mostly as suitably exotic explanations for what is perceived “alien” plants. BioMed Central 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4595001/ /pubmed/26438411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0056-9 Text en © Alm. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Alm, Torbjørn
Plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in Norway and some other European countries: xenophobic tales or not?
title Plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in Norway and some other European countries: xenophobic tales or not?
title_full Plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in Norway and some other European countries: xenophobic tales or not?
title_fullStr Plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in Norway and some other European countries: xenophobic tales or not?
title_full_unstemmed Plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in Norway and some other European countries: xenophobic tales or not?
title_short Plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in Norway and some other European countries: xenophobic tales or not?
title_sort plant species introduced by foreigners according to folk tradition in norway and some other european countries: xenophobic tales or not?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0056-9
work_keys_str_mv AT almtorbjørn plantspeciesintroducedbyforeignersaccordingtofolktraditioninnorwayandsomeothereuropeancountriesxenophobictalesornot