Cargando…
Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK)
BACKGROUND: Although sentinel animals are used successfully throughout the world to monitor arbovirus activity, ethical considerations and cross-reactions in serological assays highlight the importance of developing viable alternatives. Here we outline the development of a passive sentinel mosquito...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26444264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1114-9 |
_version_ | 1782393540464082944 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Brian J. Kerlin, Tim Hall-Mendelin, Sonja van den Hurk, Andrew F. Cortis, Giles Doggett, Stephen L. Toi, Cheryl Fall, Ken McMahon, Jamie L. Townsend, Michael Ritchie, Scott A. |
author_facet | Johnson, Brian J. Kerlin, Tim Hall-Mendelin, Sonja van den Hurk, Andrew F. Cortis, Giles Doggett, Stephen L. Toi, Cheryl Fall, Ken McMahon, Jamie L. Townsend, Michael Ritchie, Scott A. |
author_sort | Johnson, Brian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although sentinel animals are used successfully throughout the world to monitor arbovirus activity, ethical considerations and cross-reactions in serological assays highlight the importance of developing viable alternatives. Here we outline the development of a passive sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) that allows for the detection of arboviruses on honey-baited nucleic acid preservation cards (Flinders Technology Associates; FTA®) and has a similar trap efficacy as standard light traps in our trials. METHODS: The trap efficacy of the SMACK was assessed against Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) miniature light traps (standard and ultraviolet) and the Encephalitis Vector Survey (EVS) trap in a series of Latin square field trials conducted in North Queensland, Australia. The ability of the SMACK to serve as a sentinel arbovirus surveillance tool was assessed in comparison to Passive Box Traps (PBT) during the 2014 wet season in the Cairns, Australia region and individually in the remote Northern Peninsula Area (NPA) of Australia during the 2015 wet season. RESULTS: The SMACK caught comparable numbers of mosquitoes to both CDC light traps (mean capture ratio 0.86: 1) and consistently outperformed the EVS trap (mean capture ratio 2.28: 1) when CO(2) was supplied by either a gas cylinder (500 ml/min) or dry ice (1 kg). During the 2014 arbovirus survey, the SMACK captured significantly (t(6) = 2.1, P = 0.04) more mosquitoes than the PBT, and 2 and 1 FTA® cards were positive for Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus, respectively, while no arboviruses were detected from PBTs. Arbovirus activity was detected at all three surveillance sites during the NPA survey in 2015 and ca. 27 % of FTA® cards tested positive for either Murray Valley encephalitis virus (2 detections), West Nile virus (Kunjin subtype; 13 detections), or both viruses on two occasions. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the SMACK is a versatile, simple, and effective passive arbovirus surveillance tool that may also be used as a traditional overnight mosquito trap and has the potential to become a practical substitute for sentinel animal programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4595114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45951142015-10-07 Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) Johnson, Brian J. Kerlin, Tim Hall-Mendelin, Sonja van den Hurk, Andrew F. Cortis, Giles Doggett, Stephen L. Toi, Cheryl Fall, Ken McMahon, Jamie L. Townsend, Michael Ritchie, Scott A. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Although sentinel animals are used successfully throughout the world to monitor arbovirus activity, ethical considerations and cross-reactions in serological assays highlight the importance of developing viable alternatives. Here we outline the development of a passive sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) that allows for the detection of arboviruses on honey-baited nucleic acid preservation cards (Flinders Technology Associates; FTA®) and has a similar trap efficacy as standard light traps in our trials. METHODS: The trap efficacy of the SMACK was assessed against Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) miniature light traps (standard and ultraviolet) and the Encephalitis Vector Survey (EVS) trap in a series of Latin square field trials conducted in North Queensland, Australia. The ability of the SMACK to serve as a sentinel arbovirus surveillance tool was assessed in comparison to Passive Box Traps (PBT) during the 2014 wet season in the Cairns, Australia region and individually in the remote Northern Peninsula Area (NPA) of Australia during the 2015 wet season. RESULTS: The SMACK caught comparable numbers of mosquitoes to both CDC light traps (mean capture ratio 0.86: 1) and consistently outperformed the EVS trap (mean capture ratio 2.28: 1) when CO(2) was supplied by either a gas cylinder (500 ml/min) or dry ice (1 kg). During the 2014 arbovirus survey, the SMACK captured significantly (t(6) = 2.1, P = 0.04) more mosquitoes than the PBT, and 2 and 1 FTA® cards were positive for Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus, respectively, while no arboviruses were detected from PBTs. Arbovirus activity was detected at all three surveillance sites during the NPA survey in 2015 and ca. 27 % of FTA® cards tested positive for either Murray Valley encephalitis virus (2 detections), West Nile virus (Kunjin subtype; 13 detections), or both viruses on two occasions. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the SMACK is a versatile, simple, and effective passive arbovirus surveillance tool that may also be used as a traditional overnight mosquito trap and has the potential to become a practical substitute for sentinel animal programs. BioMed Central 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4595114/ /pubmed/26444264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1114-9 Text en © Johnson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Johnson, Brian J. Kerlin, Tim Hall-Mendelin, Sonja van den Hurk, Andrew F. Cortis, Giles Doggett, Stephen L. Toi, Cheryl Fall, Ken McMahon, Jamie L. Townsend, Michael Ritchie, Scott A. Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) |
title | Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) |
title_full | Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) |
title_fullStr | Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) |
title_short | Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) |
title_sort | development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (smack) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26444264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1114-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonbrianj developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT kerlintim developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT hallmendelinsonja developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT vandenhurkandrewf developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT cortisgiles developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT doggettstephenl developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT toicheryl developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT fallken developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT mcmahonjamiel developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT townsendmichael developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack AT ritchiescotta developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack |