Cargando…

Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK)

BACKGROUND: Although sentinel animals are used successfully throughout the world to monitor arbovirus activity, ethical considerations and cross-reactions in serological assays highlight the importance of developing viable alternatives. Here we outline the development of a passive sentinel mosquito...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Brian J., Kerlin, Tim, Hall-Mendelin, Sonja, van den Hurk, Andrew F., Cortis, Giles, Doggett, Stephen L., Toi, Cheryl, Fall, Ken, McMahon, Jamie L., Townsend, Michael, Ritchie, Scott A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26444264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1114-9
_version_ 1782393540464082944
author Johnson, Brian J.
Kerlin, Tim
Hall-Mendelin, Sonja
van den Hurk, Andrew F.
Cortis, Giles
Doggett, Stephen L.
Toi, Cheryl
Fall, Ken
McMahon, Jamie L.
Townsend, Michael
Ritchie, Scott A.
author_facet Johnson, Brian J.
Kerlin, Tim
Hall-Mendelin, Sonja
van den Hurk, Andrew F.
Cortis, Giles
Doggett, Stephen L.
Toi, Cheryl
Fall, Ken
McMahon, Jamie L.
Townsend, Michael
Ritchie, Scott A.
author_sort Johnson, Brian J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although sentinel animals are used successfully throughout the world to monitor arbovirus activity, ethical considerations and cross-reactions in serological assays highlight the importance of developing viable alternatives. Here we outline the development of a passive sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) that allows for the detection of arboviruses on honey-baited nucleic acid preservation cards (Flinders Technology Associates; FTA®) and has a similar trap efficacy as standard light traps in our trials. METHODS: The trap efficacy of the SMACK was assessed against Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) miniature light traps (standard and ultraviolet) and the Encephalitis Vector Survey (EVS) trap in a series of Latin square field trials conducted in North Queensland, Australia. The ability of the SMACK to serve as a sentinel arbovirus surveillance tool was assessed in comparison to Passive Box Traps (PBT) during the 2014 wet season in the Cairns, Australia region and individually in the remote Northern Peninsula Area (NPA) of Australia during the 2015 wet season. RESULTS: The SMACK caught comparable numbers of mosquitoes to both CDC light traps (mean capture ratio 0.86: 1) and consistently outperformed the EVS trap (mean capture ratio 2.28: 1) when CO(2) was supplied by either a gas cylinder (500 ml/min) or dry ice (1 kg). During the 2014 arbovirus survey, the SMACK captured significantly (t(6) = 2.1, P = 0.04) more mosquitoes than the PBT, and 2 and 1 FTA® cards were positive for Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus, respectively, while no arboviruses were detected from PBTs. Arbovirus activity was detected at all three surveillance sites during the NPA survey in 2015 and ca. 27 % of FTA® cards tested positive for either Murray Valley encephalitis virus (2 detections), West Nile virus (Kunjin subtype; 13 detections), or both viruses on two occasions. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the SMACK is a versatile, simple, and effective passive arbovirus surveillance tool that may also be used as a traditional overnight mosquito trap and has the potential to become a practical substitute for sentinel animal programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4595114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45951142015-10-07 Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) Johnson, Brian J. Kerlin, Tim Hall-Mendelin, Sonja van den Hurk, Andrew F. Cortis, Giles Doggett, Stephen L. Toi, Cheryl Fall, Ken McMahon, Jamie L. Townsend, Michael Ritchie, Scott A. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Although sentinel animals are used successfully throughout the world to monitor arbovirus activity, ethical considerations and cross-reactions in serological assays highlight the importance of developing viable alternatives. Here we outline the development of a passive sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK) that allows for the detection of arboviruses on honey-baited nucleic acid preservation cards (Flinders Technology Associates; FTA®) and has a similar trap efficacy as standard light traps in our trials. METHODS: The trap efficacy of the SMACK was assessed against Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) miniature light traps (standard and ultraviolet) and the Encephalitis Vector Survey (EVS) trap in a series of Latin square field trials conducted in North Queensland, Australia. The ability of the SMACK to serve as a sentinel arbovirus surveillance tool was assessed in comparison to Passive Box Traps (PBT) during the 2014 wet season in the Cairns, Australia region and individually in the remote Northern Peninsula Area (NPA) of Australia during the 2015 wet season. RESULTS: The SMACK caught comparable numbers of mosquitoes to both CDC light traps (mean capture ratio 0.86: 1) and consistently outperformed the EVS trap (mean capture ratio 2.28: 1) when CO(2) was supplied by either a gas cylinder (500 ml/min) or dry ice (1 kg). During the 2014 arbovirus survey, the SMACK captured significantly (t(6) = 2.1, P = 0.04) more mosquitoes than the PBT, and 2 and 1 FTA® cards were positive for Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus, respectively, while no arboviruses were detected from PBTs. Arbovirus activity was detected at all three surveillance sites during the NPA survey in 2015 and ca. 27 % of FTA® cards tested positive for either Murray Valley encephalitis virus (2 detections), West Nile virus (Kunjin subtype; 13 detections), or both viruses on two occasions. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the SMACK is a versatile, simple, and effective passive arbovirus surveillance tool that may also be used as a traditional overnight mosquito trap and has the potential to become a practical substitute for sentinel animal programs. BioMed Central 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4595114/ /pubmed/26444264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1114-9 Text en © Johnson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Johnson, Brian J.
Kerlin, Tim
Hall-Mendelin, Sonja
van den Hurk, Andrew F.
Cortis, Giles
Doggett, Stephen L.
Toi, Cheryl
Fall, Ken
McMahon, Jamie L.
Townsend, Michael
Ritchie, Scott A.
Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK)
title Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK)
title_full Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK)
title_fullStr Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK)
title_full_unstemmed Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK)
title_short Development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (SMACK)
title_sort development and field evaluation of the sentinel mosquito arbovirus capture kit (smack)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26444264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1114-9
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonbrianj developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT kerlintim developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT hallmendelinsonja developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT vandenhurkandrewf developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT cortisgiles developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT doggettstephenl developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT toicheryl developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT fallken developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT mcmahonjamiel developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT townsendmichael developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack
AT ritchiescotta developmentandfieldevaluationofthesentinelmosquitoarboviruscapturekitsmack