Cargando…

Primary Care Provider Evaluation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans Developed for Patients in their Practice

OBJECTIVE: Survivorship care plans (SCP), which describe a cancer survivor’s diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, are recommended. The study objective was to evaluate primary care providers’ (PCP) responses to SCPs developed for breast and colorectal cancer survivors in their practice and to determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dittus, Kim L., Sprague, Brian L., Pace, Claire M., Dulko, Dorothy A., Pollack, Lori A., Hawkins, Nikki A., Geller, Berta M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451385
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000163
_version_ 1782393549280509952
author Dittus, Kim L.
Sprague, Brian L.
Pace, Claire M.
Dulko, Dorothy A.
Pollack, Lori A.
Hawkins, Nikki A.
Geller, Berta M.
author_facet Dittus, Kim L.
Sprague, Brian L.
Pace, Claire M.
Dulko, Dorothy A.
Pollack, Lori A.
Hawkins, Nikki A.
Geller, Berta M.
author_sort Dittus, Kim L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Survivorship care plans (SCP), which describe a cancer survivor’s diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, are recommended. The study objective was to evaluate primary care providers’ (PCP) responses to SCPs developed for breast and colorectal cancer survivors in their practice and to determine whether PCP response to the SCPs varied according to characteristics of the practitioner and their practice. METHOD: SCPs were created using the Journey Forward® Care Plan for breast and colorectal cancer patients in rural and urban settings. The SCP and a survey were sent to PCPs. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Attitudes regarding survivorship care plans. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (70.9% response rate) surveys were completed. Most felt the SCP was useful (90%), that it enhanced understanding (75%) and that detail was sufficient (>80%). However, 15% disagreed that the care plan helped them understand their role, a perception especially prevalent among PCPs in the rural setting. Among PCPs with ≤ 18 years in practice, 95% agreed that the SCP would improve communication with patients, contrasted with 60% of those with >21 years in practice. The most common barrier to providing follow-up care was limited access to survivors. CONCLUSIONS: While SCPs appear to improve PCPs understanding of a cancer diagnosis and treatment, clear delineation of each provider’s role in follow-up care is needed. Additional detail on which tests are needed and education on late and long term effects of cancer may improve coordination of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4595165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45951652015-10-06 Primary Care Provider Evaluation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans Developed for Patients in their Practice Dittus, Kim L. Sprague, Brian L. Pace, Claire M. Dulko, Dorothy A. Pollack, Lori A. Hawkins, Nikki A. Geller, Berta M. J Gen Pract (Los Angel) Article OBJECTIVE: Survivorship care plans (SCP), which describe a cancer survivor’s diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, are recommended. The study objective was to evaluate primary care providers’ (PCP) responses to SCPs developed for breast and colorectal cancer survivors in their practice and to determine whether PCP response to the SCPs varied according to characteristics of the practitioner and their practice. METHOD: SCPs were created using the Journey Forward® Care Plan for breast and colorectal cancer patients in rural and urban settings. The SCP and a survey were sent to PCPs. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Attitudes regarding survivorship care plans. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (70.9% response rate) surveys were completed. Most felt the SCP was useful (90%), that it enhanced understanding (75%) and that detail was sufficient (>80%). However, 15% disagreed that the care plan helped them understand their role, a perception especially prevalent among PCPs in the rural setting. Among PCPs with ≤ 18 years in practice, 95% agreed that the SCP would improve communication with patients, contrasted with 60% of those with >21 years in practice. The most common barrier to providing follow-up care was limited access to survivors. CONCLUSIONS: While SCPs appear to improve PCPs understanding of a cancer diagnosis and treatment, clear delineation of each provider’s role in follow-up care is needed. Additional detail on which tests are needed and education on late and long term effects of cancer may improve coordination of care. 2014-05-26 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4595165/ /pubmed/26451385 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000163 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Dittus, Kim L.
Sprague, Brian L.
Pace, Claire M.
Dulko, Dorothy A.
Pollack, Lori A.
Hawkins, Nikki A.
Geller, Berta M.
Primary Care Provider Evaluation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans Developed for Patients in their Practice
title Primary Care Provider Evaluation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans Developed for Patients in their Practice
title_full Primary Care Provider Evaluation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans Developed for Patients in their Practice
title_fullStr Primary Care Provider Evaluation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans Developed for Patients in their Practice
title_full_unstemmed Primary Care Provider Evaluation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans Developed for Patients in their Practice
title_short Primary Care Provider Evaluation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans Developed for Patients in their Practice
title_sort primary care provider evaluation of cancer survivorship care plans developed for patients in their practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451385
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000163
work_keys_str_mv AT dittuskiml primarycareproviderevaluationofcancersurvivorshipcareplansdevelopedforpatientsintheirpractice
AT spraguebrianl primarycareproviderevaluationofcancersurvivorshipcareplansdevelopedforpatientsintheirpractice
AT paceclairem primarycareproviderevaluationofcancersurvivorshipcareplansdevelopedforpatientsintheirpractice
AT dulkodorothya primarycareproviderevaluationofcancersurvivorshipcareplansdevelopedforpatientsintheirpractice
AT pollackloria primarycareproviderevaluationofcancersurvivorshipcareplansdevelopedforpatientsintheirpractice
AT hawkinsnikkia primarycareproviderevaluationofcancersurvivorshipcareplansdevelopedforpatientsintheirpractice
AT gellerbertam primarycareproviderevaluationofcancersurvivorshipcareplansdevelopedforpatientsintheirpractice