Cargando…
Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment
BACKGROUND: Malaria prevalence, clinical incidence, treatment, and transmission rates are dynamically interrelated. Prevalence is often considered a measure of malaria transmission, but treatment of clinical malaria reduces prevalence, and consequently also infectiousness to the mosquito vector and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26437798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0864-3 |
_version_ | 1782393556323794944 |
---|---|
author | Penny, Melissa A. Maire, Nicolas Bever, Caitlin A. Pemberton-Ross, Peter Briët, Olivier J. T. Smith, David L. Gething, Peter W. Smith, Thomas A. |
author_facet | Penny, Melissa A. Maire, Nicolas Bever, Caitlin A. Pemberton-Ross, Peter Briët, Olivier J. T. Smith, David L. Gething, Peter W. Smith, Thomas A. |
author_sort | Penny, Melissa A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Malaria prevalence, clinical incidence, treatment, and transmission rates are dynamically interrelated. Prevalence is often considered a measure of malaria transmission, but treatment of clinical malaria reduces prevalence, and consequently also infectiousness to the mosquito vector and onward transmission. The impact of the frequency of treatment on prevalence in a population is generally not considered. This can lead to potential underestimation of malaria exposure in settings with good health systems. Furthermore, these dynamical relationships between prevalence, treatment, and transmission have not generally been taken into account in estimates of burden. METHODS: Using prevalence as an input, estimates of disease incidence and transmission [as the distribution of the entomological inoculation rate (EIR)] for Plasmodium falciparum have now been made for 43 countries in Africa using both empirical relationships (that do not allow for treatment) and OpenMalaria dynamic micro-simulation models (that explicitly include the effects of treatment). For each estimate, prevalence inputs were taken from geo-statistical models fitted for the year 2010 by the Malaria Atlas Project to all available observed prevalence data. National level estimates of the effectiveness of case management in treating clinical attacks were used as inputs to the estimation of both EIR and disease incidence by the dynamic models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: When coverage of effective treatment is taken into account, higher country level estimates of average EIR and thus higher disease burden, are obtained for a given prevalence level, especially where access to treatment is high, and prevalence relatively low. These methods provide a unified framework for comparison of both the immediate and longer-term impacts of case management and of preventive interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0864-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4595196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45951962015-10-07 Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment Penny, Melissa A. Maire, Nicolas Bever, Caitlin A. Pemberton-Ross, Peter Briët, Olivier J. T. Smith, David L. Gething, Peter W. Smith, Thomas A. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria prevalence, clinical incidence, treatment, and transmission rates are dynamically interrelated. Prevalence is often considered a measure of malaria transmission, but treatment of clinical malaria reduces prevalence, and consequently also infectiousness to the mosquito vector and onward transmission. The impact of the frequency of treatment on prevalence in a population is generally not considered. This can lead to potential underestimation of malaria exposure in settings with good health systems. Furthermore, these dynamical relationships between prevalence, treatment, and transmission have not generally been taken into account in estimates of burden. METHODS: Using prevalence as an input, estimates of disease incidence and transmission [as the distribution of the entomological inoculation rate (EIR)] for Plasmodium falciparum have now been made for 43 countries in Africa using both empirical relationships (that do not allow for treatment) and OpenMalaria dynamic micro-simulation models (that explicitly include the effects of treatment). For each estimate, prevalence inputs were taken from geo-statistical models fitted for the year 2010 by the Malaria Atlas Project to all available observed prevalence data. National level estimates of the effectiveness of case management in treating clinical attacks were used as inputs to the estimation of both EIR and disease incidence by the dynamic models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: When coverage of effective treatment is taken into account, higher country level estimates of average EIR and thus higher disease burden, are obtained for a given prevalence level, especially where access to treatment is high, and prevalence relatively low. These methods provide a unified framework for comparison of both the immediate and longer-term impacts of case management and of preventive interventions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0864-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4595196/ /pubmed/26437798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0864-3 Text en © Penny et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Penny, Melissa A. Maire, Nicolas Bever, Caitlin A. Pemberton-Ross, Peter Briët, Olivier J. T. Smith, David L. Gething, Peter W. Smith, Thomas A. Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment |
title | Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment |
title_full | Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment |
title_fullStr | Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment |
title_short | Distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in Africa considering country levels of effective treatment |
title_sort | distribution of malaria exposure in endemic countries in africa considering country levels of effective treatment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26437798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0864-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pennymelissaa distributionofmalariaexposureinendemiccountriesinafricaconsideringcountrylevelsofeffectivetreatment AT mairenicolas distributionofmalariaexposureinendemiccountriesinafricaconsideringcountrylevelsofeffectivetreatment AT bevercaitlina distributionofmalariaexposureinendemiccountriesinafricaconsideringcountrylevelsofeffectivetreatment AT pembertonrosspeter distributionofmalariaexposureinendemiccountriesinafricaconsideringcountrylevelsofeffectivetreatment AT brietolivierjt distributionofmalariaexposureinendemiccountriesinafricaconsideringcountrylevelsofeffectivetreatment AT smithdavidl distributionofmalariaexposureinendemiccountriesinafricaconsideringcountrylevelsofeffectivetreatment AT gethingpeterw distributionofmalariaexposureinendemiccountriesinafricaconsideringcountrylevelsofeffectivetreatment AT smiththomasa distributionofmalariaexposureinendemiccountriesinafricaconsideringcountrylevelsofeffectivetreatment |