Cargando…

Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment

BACKGROUND: The response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer can be assessed by clinical examination, consisting of digital rectal examination (DRE) and endoscopy, and by MRI. A high accuracy is required to select complete response (CR) for organ-preserving treatment. The aim of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maas, Monique, Lambregts, Doenja M. J., Nelemans, Patty J., Heijnen, Luc A., Martens, Milou H., Leijtens, Jeroen W. A., Sosef, Meindert, Hulsewé, Karel W. E., Hoff, Christiaan, Breukink, Stephanie O., Stassen, Laurents, Beets-Tan, Regina G. H., Beets, Geerard L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26198074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4687-9
_version_ 1782393623962189824
author Maas, Monique
Lambregts, Doenja M. J.
Nelemans, Patty J.
Heijnen, Luc A.
Martens, Milou H.
Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
Sosef, Meindert
Hulsewé, Karel W. E.
Hoff, Christiaan
Breukink, Stephanie O.
Stassen, Laurents
Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
Beets, Geerard L.
author_facet Maas, Monique
Lambregts, Doenja M. J.
Nelemans, Patty J.
Heijnen, Luc A.
Martens, Milou H.
Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
Sosef, Meindert
Hulsewé, Karel W. E.
Hoff, Christiaan
Breukink, Stephanie O.
Stassen, Laurents
Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
Beets, Geerard L.
author_sort Maas, Monique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer can be assessed by clinical examination, consisting of digital rectal examination (DRE) and endoscopy, and by MRI. A high accuracy is required to select complete response (CR) for organ-preserving treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of clinical examination (endoscopy with or without biopsy and DRE), T2W-MRI, and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) for the detection of CR after CRT. METHODS: This prospective cohort study in a university hospital recruited 50 patients who underwent clinical assessment (DRE, endoscopy with or without biopsy), T2W-MRI, and DWI at 6–8 weeks after CRT. Confidence levels were used to score the likelihood of CR. The reference standard was histopathology or recurrence-free interval of >12 months in cases of wait-and-see approaches. Diagnostic performance was calculated by area under the receiver operator characteristics curve, with corresponding sensitivities and specificities. Strategies were assessed and compared by use of likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Seventeen (34 %) of 50 patients had a CR. Areas under the curve were 0.88 (0.78–1.00) for clinical assessment and 0.79 (0.66–0.92) for T2W-MRI and DWI. Combining the modalities led to a posttest probability for predicting a CR of 98 %. Conversely, when all modalities indicated residual tumor, 15 % of patients still experienced CR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical assessment after CRT is the single most accurate modality for identification of CR after CRT. Addition of MRI with DWI further improves the diagnostic performance, and the combination can be recommended as the optimal strategy for a safe and accurate selection of CR after CRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4595525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45955252015-10-09 Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment Maas, Monique Lambregts, Doenja M. J. Nelemans, Patty J. Heijnen, Luc A. Martens, Milou H. Leijtens, Jeroen W. A. Sosef, Meindert Hulsewé, Karel W. E. Hoff, Christiaan Breukink, Stephanie O. Stassen, Laurents Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. Beets, Geerard L. Ann Surg Oncol Colorectal Cancer BACKGROUND: The response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer can be assessed by clinical examination, consisting of digital rectal examination (DRE) and endoscopy, and by MRI. A high accuracy is required to select complete response (CR) for organ-preserving treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of clinical examination (endoscopy with or without biopsy and DRE), T2W-MRI, and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) for the detection of CR after CRT. METHODS: This prospective cohort study in a university hospital recruited 50 patients who underwent clinical assessment (DRE, endoscopy with or without biopsy), T2W-MRI, and DWI at 6–8 weeks after CRT. Confidence levels were used to score the likelihood of CR. The reference standard was histopathology or recurrence-free interval of >12 months in cases of wait-and-see approaches. Diagnostic performance was calculated by area under the receiver operator characteristics curve, with corresponding sensitivities and specificities. Strategies were assessed and compared by use of likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Seventeen (34 %) of 50 patients had a CR. Areas under the curve were 0.88 (0.78–1.00) for clinical assessment and 0.79 (0.66–0.92) for T2W-MRI and DWI. Combining the modalities led to a posttest probability for predicting a CR of 98 %. Conversely, when all modalities indicated residual tumor, 15 % of patients still experienced CR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical assessment after CRT is the single most accurate modality for identification of CR after CRT. Addition of MRI with DWI further improves the diagnostic performance, and the combination can be recommended as the optimal strategy for a safe and accurate selection of CR after CRT. Springer US 2015-07-22 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4595525/ /pubmed/26198074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4687-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Colorectal Cancer
Maas, Monique
Lambregts, Doenja M. J.
Nelemans, Patty J.
Heijnen, Luc A.
Martens, Milou H.
Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
Sosef, Meindert
Hulsewé, Karel W. E.
Hoff, Christiaan
Breukink, Stephanie O.
Stassen, Laurents
Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
Beets, Geerard L.
Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment
title Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment
title_full Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment
title_fullStr Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment
title_short Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for Organ-Saving Treatment
title_sort assessment of clinical complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer with digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and mri: selection for organ-saving treatment
topic Colorectal Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26198074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4687-9
work_keys_str_mv AT maasmonique assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT lambregtsdoenjamj assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT nelemanspattyj assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT heijnenluca assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT martensmilouh assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT leijtensjeroenwa assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT sosefmeindert assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT hulsewekarelwe assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT hoffchristiaan assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT breukinkstephanieo assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT stassenlaurents assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT beetstanreginagh assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment
AT beetsgeerardl assessmentofclinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiationforrectalcancerwithdigitalrectalexaminationendoscopyandmriselectionfororgansavingtreatment