Cargando…

Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients

Objectives To assess the influence of stage at breast cancer diagnosis, tumour biology, and treatment on survival in contemporary times of better (neo-)adjuvant systemic therapy. Design Prospective nationwide population based study. Setting Nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Participants Female...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saadatmand, Sepideh, Bretveld, Reini, Siesling, Sabine, Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4901
_version_ 1782393631627280384
author Saadatmand, Sepideh
Bretveld, Reini
Siesling, Sabine
Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A
author_facet Saadatmand, Sepideh
Bretveld, Reini
Siesling, Sabine
Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A
author_sort Saadatmand, Sepideh
collection PubMed
description Objectives To assess the influence of stage at breast cancer diagnosis, tumour biology, and treatment on survival in contemporary times of better (neo-)adjuvant systemic therapy. Design Prospective nationwide population based study. Setting Nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Participants Female patients with primary breast cancer diagnosed between 1999 and 2012 (n=173 797), subdivided into two time cohorts on the basis of breast cancer diagnosis: 1999-2005 (n=80 228) and 2006-12 (n=93 569). Main outcome measures Relative survival was compared between the two cohorts. Influence of traditional prognostic factors on overall mortality was analysed with Cox regression for each cohort separately. Results Compared with 1999-2005, patients from 2006-12 had smaller (≤T1 65% (n=60 570) v 60% (n=48 031); P<0.001), more often lymph node negative (N0 68% (n=63 544) v 65% (n=52 238); P<0.001) tumours, but they received more chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy (neo-adjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy 60% (n=56 402) v 53% (n=42 185); P<0.001). Median follow-up was 9.8 years for 1999-2005 and 3.9 years for 2006-12. The relative five year survival rate in 2006-12 was 96%, improved in all tumour and nodal stages compared with 1999-2005, and 100% in tumours ≤1 cm. In multivariable analyses adjusted for age and tumour type, overall mortality was decreased by surgery (especially breast conserving), radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Mortality increased with progressing tumour size in both cohorts (2006-12 T1c v T1a: hazard ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 1.78), but without a significant difference in invasive breast cancers until 1 cm (2006-12 T1b v T1a: hazard ratio 1.04, 0.88 to 1.22), and independently with progressing number of positive lymph nodes (2006-12 N1 v N0: 1.25, 1.17 to 1.32). Conclusions Tumour stage at diagnosis of breast cancer still influences overall survival significantly in the current era of effective systemic therapy. Diagnosis of breast cancer at an early tumour stage remains vital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4595560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45955602015-10-21 Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients Saadatmand, Sepideh Bretveld, Reini Siesling, Sabine Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A BMJ Research Objectives To assess the influence of stage at breast cancer diagnosis, tumour biology, and treatment on survival in contemporary times of better (neo-)adjuvant systemic therapy. Design Prospective nationwide population based study. Setting Nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Participants Female patients with primary breast cancer diagnosed between 1999 and 2012 (n=173 797), subdivided into two time cohorts on the basis of breast cancer diagnosis: 1999-2005 (n=80 228) and 2006-12 (n=93 569). Main outcome measures Relative survival was compared between the two cohorts. Influence of traditional prognostic factors on overall mortality was analysed with Cox regression for each cohort separately. Results Compared with 1999-2005, patients from 2006-12 had smaller (≤T1 65% (n=60 570) v 60% (n=48 031); P<0.001), more often lymph node negative (N0 68% (n=63 544) v 65% (n=52 238); P<0.001) tumours, but they received more chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy (neo-adjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy 60% (n=56 402) v 53% (n=42 185); P<0.001). Median follow-up was 9.8 years for 1999-2005 and 3.9 years for 2006-12. The relative five year survival rate in 2006-12 was 96%, improved in all tumour and nodal stages compared with 1999-2005, and 100% in tumours ≤1 cm. In multivariable analyses adjusted for age and tumour type, overall mortality was decreased by surgery (especially breast conserving), radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Mortality increased with progressing tumour size in both cohorts (2006-12 T1c v T1a: hazard ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 1.78), but without a significant difference in invasive breast cancers until 1 cm (2006-12 T1b v T1a: hazard ratio 1.04, 0.88 to 1.22), and independently with progressing number of positive lymph nodes (2006-12 N1 v N0: 1.25, 1.17 to 1.32). Conclusions Tumour stage at diagnosis of breast cancer still influences overall survival significantly in the current era of effective systemic therapy. Diagnosis of breast cancer at an early tumour stage remains vital. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4595560/ /pubmed/26442924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4901 Text en © Saadatmand et al 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Saadatmand, Sepideh
Bretveld, Reini
Siesling, Sabine
Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M A
Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients
title Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients
title_full Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients
title_fullStr Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients
title_full_unstemmed Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients
title_short Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients
title_sort influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173 797 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4901
work_keys_str_mv AT saadatmandsepideh influenceoftumourstageatbreastcancerdetectiononsurvivalinmoderntimespopulationbasedstudyin173797patients
AT bretveldreini influenceoftumourstageatbreastcancerdetectiononsurvivalinmoderntimespopulationbasedstudyin173797patients
AT sieslingsabine influenceoftumourstageatbreastcancerdetectiononsurvivalinmoderntimespopulationbasedstudyin173797patients
AT tilanuslinthorstmadeleinema influenceoftumourstageatbreastcancerdetectiononsurvivalinmoderntimespopulationbasedstudyin173797patients