Cargando…
Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption
Hair analysis for cannabinoids is extensively applied in workplace drug testing and in child protection cases, although valid data on incorporation of the main analytical targets, ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THC-COOH), into human hair is widely missing. Furthermore, ∆9-te...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14906 |
_version_ | 1782393644113723392 |
---|---|
author | Moosmann, Bjoern Roth, Nadine Auwärter, Volker |
author_facet | Moosmann, Bjoern Roth, Nadine Auwärter, Volker |
author_sort | Moosmann, Bjoern |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hair analysis for cannabinoids is extensively applied in workplace drug testing and in child protection cases, although valid data on incorporation of the main analytical targets, ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THC-COOH), into human hair is widely missing. Furthermore, ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid A (THCA-A), the biogenetic precursor of THC, is found in the hair of persons who solely handled cannabis material. In the light of the serious consequences of positive test results the mechanisms of drug incorporation into hair urgently need scientific evaluation. Here we show that neither THC nor THCA-A are incorporated into human hair in relevant amounts after systemic uptake. THC-COOH, which is considered an incontestable proof of THC uptake according to the current scientific doctrine, was found in hair, but was also present in older hair segments, which already grew before the oral THC intake and in sebum/sweat samples. Our studies show that all three cannabinoids can be present in hair of non-consuming individuals because of transfer through cannabis consumers, via their hands, their sebum/sweat, or cannabis smoke. This is of concern for e.g. child-custody cases as cannabinoid findings in a child’s hair may be caused by close contact to cannabis consumers rather than by inhalation of side-stream smoke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4595642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45956422015-10-13 Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption Moosmann, Bjoern Roth, Nadine Auwärter, Volker Sci Rep Article Hair analysis for cannabinoids is extensively applied in workplace drug testing and in child protection cases, although valid data on incorporation of the main analytical targets, ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THC-COOH), into human hair is widely missing. Furthermore, ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid A (THCA-A), the biogenetic precursor of THC, is found in the hair of persons who solely handled cannabis material. In the light of the serious consequences of positive test results the mechanisms of drug incorporation into hair urgently need scientific evaluation. Here we show that neither THC nor THCA-A are incorporated into human hair in relevant amounts after systemic uptake. THC-COOH, which is considered an incontestable proof of THC uptake according to the current scientific doctrine, was found in hair, but was also present in older hair segments, which already grew before the oral THC intake and in sebum/sweat samples. Our studies show that all three cannabinoids can be present in hair of non-consuming individuals because of transfer through cannabis consumers, via their hands, their sebum/sweat, or cannabis smoke. This is of concern for e.g. child-custody cases as cannabinoid findings in a child’s hair may be caused by close contact to cannabis consumers rather than by inhalation of side-stream smoke. Nature Publishing Group 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4595642/ /pubmed/26443501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14906 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Moosmann, Bjoern Roth, Nadine Auwärter, Volker Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption |
title | Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption |
title_full | Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption |
title_fullStr | Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption |
title_full_unstemmed | Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption |
title_short | Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption |
title_sort | finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moosmannbjoern findingcannabinoidsinhairdoesnotprovecannabisconsumption AT rothnadine findingcannabinoidsinhairdoesnotprovecannabisconsumption AT auwartervolker findingcannabinoidsinhairdoesnotprovecannabisconsumption |