Cargando…

Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS

The neuromodulation technique transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is thought to produce its effects on behavior by altering cortical excitability. Although the mechanisms underlying the observed effects are thought to rely on the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanley, Claire J., Tommerdahl, Mark, McGonigle, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00400
_version_ 1782393648074194944
author Hanley, Claire J.
Tommerdahl, Mark
McGonigle, David J.
author_facet Hanley, Claire J.
Tommerdahl, Mark
McGonigle, David J.
author_sort Hanley, Claire J.
collection PubMed
description The neuromodulation technique transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is thought to produce its effects on behavior by altering cortical excitability. Although the mechanisms underlying the observed effects are thought to rely on the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission, the physiological principles of the technique are not completely understood. In this study, we examine the influence of tDCS on vibrotactile adaptation, using a simple amplitude discrimination paradigm that has been shown to exhibit modifications in performance due to changes in inhibitory neurotransmission. Double-blind tDCS (Anodal/Sham) of 1 mA was delivered for 600 s to electrodes positioned in a somatosensory/contralateral orbit montage. Stimulation was applied as part of a pre/post design, between blocks of the behavioral tasks. In accordance with previous work, results obtained before the application of tDCS indicated that amplitude discrimination thresholds were significantly worsened during adaptation trials, compared to those achieved at baseline. However, tDCS failed to modify amplitude discrimination performance. Using a Bayesian approach, this finding was revealed to constitute substantial evidence for the null hypothesis. The failure of DC stimulation to alter vibrotactile adaptation thresholds is discussed in the context of several factors that may have confounded the induction of changes in cortical plasticity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4595660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45956602015-10-23 Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS Hanley, Claire J. Tommerdahl, Mark McGonigle, David J. Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience The neuromodulation technique transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is thought to produce its effects on behavior by altering cortical excitability. Although the mechanisms underlying the observed effects are thought to rely on the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission, the physiological principles of the technique are not completely understood. In this study, we examine the influence of tDCS on vibrotactile adaptation, using a simple amplitude discrimination paradigm that has been shown to exhibit modifications in performance due to changes in inhibitory neurotransmission. Double-blind tDCS (Anodal/Sham) of 1 mA was delivered for 600 s to electrodes positioned in a somatosensory/contralateral orbit montage. Stimulation was applied as part of a pre/post design, between blocks of the behavioral tasks. In accordance with previous work, results obtained before the application of tDCS indicated that amplitude discrimination thresholds were significantly worsened during adaptation trials, compared to those achieved at baseline. However, tDCS failed to modify amplitude discrimination performance. Using a Bayesian approach, this finding was revealed to constitute substantial evidence for the null hypothesis. The failure of DC stimulation to alter vibrotactile adaptation thresholds is discussed in the context of several factors that may have confounded the induction of changes in cortical plasticity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4595660/ /pubmed/26500499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00400 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hanley, Tommerdahl and McGonigle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hanley, Claire J.
Tommerdahl, Mark
McGonigle, David J.
Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS
title Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS
title_full Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS
title_fullStr Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS
title_full_unstemmed Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS
title_short Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS
title_sort stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tdcs
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00400
work_keys_str_mv AT hanleyclairej stimulatingsomatosensorypsychophysicsadoubleblindshamcontrolledstudyoftheneurobiologicalmechanismsoftdcs
AT tommerdahlmark stimulatingsomatosensorypsychophysicsadoubleblindshamcontrolledstudyoftheneurobiologicalmechanismsoftdcs
AT mcgonigledavidj stimulatingsomatosensorypsychophysicsadoubleblindshamcontrolledstudyoftheneurobiologicalmechanismsoftdcs