Cargando…

Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory

BACKGROUND: Facilitation is a guided interactional process that has been popularized in health care. Its popularity arises from its potential to support uptake and application of scientific knowledge that stands to improve clinical and managerial decision-making, practice, and ultimately patient out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berta, Whitney, Cranley, Lisa, Dearing, James W., Dogherty, Elizabeth J., Squires, Janet E., Estabrooks, Carole A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0
_version_ 1782393740173770752
author Berta, Whitney
Cranley, Lisa
Dearing, James W.
Dogherty, Elizabeth J.
Squires, Janet E.
Estabrooks, Carole A.
author_facet Berta, Whitney
Cranley, Lisa
Dearing, James W.
Dogherty, Elizabeth J.
Squires, Janet E.
Estabrooks, Carole A.
author_sort Berta, Whitney
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Facilitation is a guided interactional process that has been popularized in health care. Its popularity arises from its potential to support uptake and application of scientific knowledge that stands to improve clinical and managerial decision-making, practice, and ultimately patient outcomes and organizational performance. While this popular concept has garnered attention in health services research, we know that both the content of facilitation and its impact on knowledge implementation vary. The basis of this variation is poorly understood, and understanding is hampered by a lack of conceptual clarity. DISCUSSION: In this paper, we argue that our understanding of facilitation and its effects is limited in part by a lack of clear theoretical grounding. We propose a theoretical home for facilitation in organizational learning theory. Referring to extant literature on facilitation and drawing on theoretical literature, we discuss the features of facilitation that suggest its role in contributing to learning capacity. We describe how facilitation may contribute to generating knowledge about the application of new scientific knowledge in health-care organizations. SUMMARY: Facilitation’s promise, we suggest, lies in its potential to stimulate higher-order learning in organizations through experimenting with, generating learning about, and sustaining small-scale adaptations to organizational processes and work routines. The varied effectiveness of facilitation observed in the literature is associated with the presence or absence of factors known to influence organizational learning, since facilitation itself appears to act as a learning mechanism. We offer propositions regarding the relationships between facilitation processes and key organizational learning concepts that have the potential to guide future work to further our understanding of the role that facilitation plays in learning and knowledge generation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4596304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45963042015-10-08 Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory Berta, Whitney Cranley, Lisa Dearing, James W. Dogherty, Elizabeth J. Squires, Janet E. Estabrooks, Carole A. Implement Sci Debate BACKGROUND: Facilitation is a guided interactional process that has been popularized in health care. Its popularity arises from its potential to support uptake and application of scientific knowledge that stands to improve clinical and managerial decision-making, practice, and ultimately patient outcomes and organizational performance. While this popular concept has garnered attention in health services research, we know that both the content of facilitation and its impact on knowledge implementation vary. The basis of this variation is poorly understood, and understanding is hampered by a lack of conceptual clarity. DISCUSSION: In this paper, we argue that our understanding of facilitation and its effects is limited in part by a lack of clear theoretical grounding. We propose a theoretical home for facilitation in organizational learning theory. Referring to extant literature on facilitation and drawing on theoretical literature, we discuss the features of facilitation that suggest its role in contributing to learning capacity. We describe how facilitation may contribute to generating knowledge about the application of new scientific knowledge in health-care organizations. SUMMARY: Facilitation’s promise, we suggest, lies in its potential to stimulate higher-order learning in organizations through experimenting with, generating learning about, and sustaining small-scale adaptations to organizational processes and work routines. The varied effectiveness of facilitation observed in the literature is associated with the presence or absence of factors known to influence organizational learning, since facilitation itself appears to act as a learning mechanism. We offer propositions regarding the relationships between facilitation processes and key organizational learning concepts that have the potential to guide future work to further our understanding of the role that facilitation plays in learning and knowledge generation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4596304/ /pubmed/26443999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0 Text en © Berta et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Berta, Whitney
Cranley, Lisa
Dearing, James W.
Dogherty, Elizabeth J.
Squires, Janet E.
Estabrooks, Carole A.
Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
title Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
title_full Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
title_fullStr Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
title_full_unstemmed Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
title_short Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
title_sort why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bertawhitney whywethinkfacilitationworksinsightsfromorganizationallearningtheory
AT cranleylisa whywethinkfacilitationworksinsightsfromorganizationallearningtheory
AT dearingjamesw whywethinkfacilitationworksinsightsfromorganizationallearningtheory
AT doghertyelizabethj whywethinkfacilitationworksinsightsfromorganizationallearningtheory
AT squiresjanete whywethinkfacilitationworksinsightsfromorganizationallearningtheory
AT estabrookscarolea whywethinkfacilitationworksinsightsfromorganizationallearningtheory