Cargando…
Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers
BACKGROUND: The hands of the medical staff play an important role in transmission of pathogens in the health care environment. Hand hygiene is efficient, easy to perform and cost-effective. Safety, tolerability and acceptance of hand hygiene preparations play a major role in hand hygiene compliance,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0079-y |
_version_ | 1782393761020510208 |
---|---|
author | Conrad, Andreas Grotejohann, Birgit Schmoor, Claudia Cosic, Drago Dettenkofer, Markus |
author_facet | Conrad, Andreas Grotejohann, Birgit Schmoor, Claudia Cosic, Drago Dettenkofer, Markus |
author_sort | Conrad, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The hands of the medical staff play an important role in transmission of pathogens in the health care environment. Hand hygiene is efficient, easy to perform and cost-effective. Safety, tolerability and acceptance of hand hygiene preparations play a major role in hand hygiene compliance, and apply, in particular, to formulations with high anti-viral activity. AIM: Clinical trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of different virucidal hand rubs. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, four-period cross-over trial, healthy volunteers received three different virucidal hand rubs (P1-P3) and a reference product (R) in randomized sequence over a period of 4 days each with a washout period. The primary endpoint was skin barrier function measured by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) after application. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects (seven male, 15 female; median age 25, range 21–54) were randomized and started at least one period. TEWL was 22.5; 95 %-confidence interval (CI): 19.6-25.4 after P1, 16.3; 13.5–19.1 after P2, 16.4; 13.4–19.3 after P3, and 24.0; 21.1–27.0 after R; p < 0.0001. The percentage of subjects experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) was 86 % with P1, 25 % with P2, 89 % with P3 and 56 % with R. The majority of AEs were skin reactions classified as of mild severity. No serious AEs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results were inconsistent. The number of AEs was higher than expected for all products. In summary, there is room for improvement both for hand rub development and the scientific approaches taken to practically and reproducibly evaluate hand rub safety and tolerability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4596416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45964162015-10-08 Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers Conrad, Andreas Grotejohann, Birgit Schmoor, Claudia Cosic, Drago Dettenkofer, Markus Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: The hands of the medical staff play an important role in transmission of pathogens in the health care environment. Hand hygiene is efficient, easy to perform and cost-effective. Safety, tolerability and acceptance of hand hygiene preparations play a major role in hand hygiene compliance, and apply, in particular, to formulations with high anti-viral activity. AIM: Clinical trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of different virucidal hand rubs. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, four-period cross-over trial, healthy volunteers received three different virucidal hand rubs (P1-P3) and a reference product (R) in randomized sequence over a period of 4 days each with a washout period. The primary endpoint was skin barrier function measured by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) after application. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects (seven male, 15 female; median age 25, range 21–54) were randomized and started at least one period. TEWL was 22.5; 95 %-confidence interval (CI): 19.6-25.4 after P1, 16.3; 13.5–19.1 after P2, 16.4; 13.4–19.3 after P3, and 24.0; 21.1–27.0 after R; p < 0.0001. The percentage of subjects experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) was 86 % with P1, 25 % with P2, 89 % with P3 and 56 % with R. The majority of AEs were skin reactions classified as of mild severity. No serious AEs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results were inconsistent. The number of AEs was higher than expected for all products. In summary, there is room for improvement both for hand rub development and the scientific approaches taken to practically and reproducibly evaluate hand rub safety and tolerability. BioMed Central 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4596416/ /pubmed/26448861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0079-y Text en © Conrad et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Conrad, Andreas Grotejohann, Birgit Schmoor, Claudia Cosic, Drago Dettenkofer, Markus Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers |
title | Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers |
title_full | Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers |
title_fullStr | Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers |
title_short | Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers |
title_sort | safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0079-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conradandreas safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers AT grotejohannbirgit safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers AT schmoorclaudia safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers AT cosicdrago safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers AT dettenkofermarkus safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers |