Cargando…

Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: The hands of the medical staff play an important role in transmission of pathogens in the health care environment. Hand hygiene is efficient, easy to perform and cost-effective. Safety, tolerability and acceptance of hand hygiene preparations play a major role in hand hygiene compliance,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conrad, Andreas, Grotejohann, Birgit, Schmoor, Claudia, Cosic, Drago, Dettenkofer, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0079-y
_version_ 1782393761020510208
author Conrad, Andreas
Grotejohann, Birgit
Schmoor, Claudia
Cosic, Drago
Dettenkofer, Markus
author_facet Conrad, Andreas
Grotejohann, Birgit
Schmoor, Claudia
Cosic, Drago
Dettenkofer, Markus
author_sort Conrad, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The hands of the medical staff play an important role in transmission of pathogens in the health care environment. Hand hygiene is efficient, easy to perform and cost-effective. Safety, tolerability and acceptance of hand hygiene preparations play a major role in hand hygiene compliance, and apply, in particular, to formulations with high anti-viral activity. AIM: Clinical trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of different virucidal hand rubs. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, four-period cross-over trial, healthy volunteers received three different virucidal hand rubs (P1-P3) and a reference product (R) in randomized sequence over a period of 4 days each with a washout period. The primary endpoint was skin barrier function measured by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) after application. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects (seven male, 15 female; median age 25, range 21–54) were randomized and started at least one period. TEWL was 22.5; 95 %-confidence interval (CI): 19.6-25.4 after P1, 16.3; 13.5–19.1 after P2, 16.4; 13.4–19.3 after P3, and 24.0; 21.1–27.0 after R; p < 0.0001. The percentage of subjects experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) was 86 % with P1, 25 % with P2, 89 % with P3 and 56 % with R. The majority of AEs were skin reactions classified as of mild severity. No serious AEs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results were inconsistent. The number of AEs was higher than expected for all products. In summary, there is room for improvement both for hand rub development and the scientific approaches taken to practically and reproducibly evaluate hand rub safety and tolerability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4596416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45964162015-10-08 Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers Conrad, Andreas Grotejohann, Birgit Schmoor, Claudia Cosic, Drago Dettenkofer, Markus Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: The hands of the medical staff play an important role in transmission of pathogens in the health care environment. Hand hygiene is efficient, easy to perform and cost-effective. Safety, tolerability and acceptance of hand hygiene preparations play a major role in hand hygiene compliance, and apply, in particular, to formulations with high anti-viral activity. AIM: Clinical trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of different virucidal hand rubs. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, four-period cross-over trial, healthy volunteers received three different virucidal hand rubs (P1-P3) and a reference product (R) in randomized sequence over a period of 4 days each with a washout period. The primary endpoint was skin barrier function measured by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) after application. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects (seven male, 15 female; median age 25, range 21–54) were randomized and started at least one period. TEWL was 22.5; 95 %-confidence interval (CI): 19.6-25.4 after P1, 16.3; 13.5–19.1 after P2, 16.4; 13.4–19.3 after P3, and 24.0; 21.1–27.0 after R; p < 0.0001. The percentage of subjects experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) was 86 % with P1, 25 % with P2, 89 % with P3 and 56 % with R. The majority of AEs were skin reactions classified as of mild severity. No serious AEs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results were inconsistent. The number of AEs was higher than expected for all products. In summary, there is room for improvement both for hand rub development and the scientific approaches taken to practically and reproducibly evaluate hand rub safety and tolerability. BioMed Central 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4596416/ /pubmed/26448861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0079-y Text en © Conrad et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Conrad, Andreas
Grotejohann, Birgit
Schmoor, Claudia
Cosic, Drago
Dettenkofer, Markus
Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers
title Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers
title_full Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers
title_short Safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers
title_sort safety and tolerability of virucidal hand rubs: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial with healthy volunteers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0079-y
work_keys_str_mv AT conradandreas safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers
AT grotejohannbirgit safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers
AT schmoorclaudia safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers
AT cosicdrago safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers
AT dettenkofermarkus safetyandtolerabilityofvirucidalhandrubsarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovertrialwithhealthyvolunteers