Cargando…
The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The effect of timing of incentive payments on the response rate of telephone surveys is unknown. This study examined whether up-front or delayed incentive payments were associated with higher response rates for participation in a telephone interview administered longitudinal cohort study...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0073-3 |
_version_ | 1782393782256271360 |
---|---|
author | Chin, Weng-Yee Choi, Edmond PH Lam, Cindy LK |
author_facet | Chin, Weng-Yee Choi, Edmond PH Lam, Cindy LK |
author_sort | Chin, Weng-Yee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effect of timing of incentive payments on the response rate of telephone surveys is unknown. This study examined whether up-front or delayed incentive payments were associated with higher response rates for participation in a telephone interview administered longitudinal cohort study amongst primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, and to compare the costs between the two timing methods. METHODS: This study was conducted as part of a naturalistic observation study on the health-related quality of life and health outcomes of Chinese primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. The incentive payment was in the form of a supermarket gift voucher to the value of HD$50 (US$6.50) and could be used in lieu of cash at a major supermarket chain.720 subjects with lower urinary tract symptoms were randomly assigned into two groups. One group was offered an incentive of supermarket cash voucher at time of recruitment (‘up-front’ payment). The other group was told that the voucher would be sent to them after the complete of their 1-year follow-up telephone interview (‘delayed’ payment). Primary outcomes were the baseline and 1-year follow-up telephone survey response rates. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in response rates at baseline (p-value = 0.938) or at the 1-year follow-up (p-value = 0.751) between groups. Cost per completed subject interviews for the up-front payment method was USD16.64, whilst cost for the delayed payment was USD 13.85. CONCLUSIONS: It appears the timing of incentive payments does not affect response rates for telephone interview surveys conducted on primary care patients in Hong Kong at baseline or at 1-year follow-up. Delayed incentive payments can reduce the overall cost per successful case. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02307929 Registered 28 August 2013 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4596508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45965082015-10-08 The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial Chin, Weng-Yee Choi, Edmond PH Lam, Cindy LK BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The effect of timing of incentive payments on the response rate of telephone surveys is unknown. This study examined whether up-front or delayed incentive payments were associated with higher response rates for participation in a telephone interview administered longitudinal cohort study amongst primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, and to compare the costs between the two timing methods. METHODS: This study was conducted as part of a naturalistic observation study on the health-related quality of life and health outcomes of Chinese primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. The incentive payment was in the form of a supermarket gift voucher to the value of HD$50 (US$6.50) and could be used in lieu of cash at a major supermarket chain.720 subjects with lower urinary tract symptoms were randomly assigned into two groups. One group was offered an incentive of supermarket cash voucher at time of recruitment (‘up-front’ payment). The other group was told that the voucher would be sent to them after the complete of their 1-year follow-up telephone interview (‘delayed’ payment). Primary outcomes were the baseline and 1-year follow-up telephone survey response rates. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in response rates at baseline (p-value = 0.938) or at the 1-year follow-up (p-value = 0.751) between groups. Cost per completed subject interviews for the up-front payment method was USD16.64, whilst cost for the delayed payment was USD 13.85. CONCLUSIONS: It appears the timing of incentive payments does not affect response rates for telephone interview surveys conducted on primary care patients in Hong Kong at baseline or at 1-year follow-up. Delayed incentive payments can reduce the overall cost per successful case. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02307929 Registered 28 August 2013 BioMed Central 2015-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4596508/ /pubmed/26445404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0073-3 Text en © Chin et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chin, Weng-Yee Choi, Edmond PH Lam, Cindy LK The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial |
title | The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of timing of incentive payments on response rates for cohort study telephone interviews in primary care setting with cost-minimization analysis, a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0073-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chinwengyee theeffectoftimingofincentivepaymentsonresponseratesforcohortstudytelephoneinterviewsinprimarycaresettingwithcostminimizationanalysisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choiedmondph theeffectoftimingofincentivepaymentsonresponseratesforcohortstudytelephoneinterviewsinprimarycaresettingwithcostminimizationanalysisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lamcindylk theeffectoftimingofincentivepaymentsonresponseratesforcohortstudytelephoneinterviewsinprimarycaresettingwithcostminimizationanalysisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chinwengyee effectoftimingofincentivepaymentsonresponseratesforcohortstudytelephoneinterviewsinprimarycaresettingwithcostminimizationanalysisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choiedmondph effectoftimingofincentivepaymentsonresponseratesforcohortstudytelephoneinterviewsinprimarycaresettingwithcostminimizationanalysisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lamcindylk effectoftimingofincentivepaymentsonresponseratesforcohortstudytelephoneinterviewsinprimarycaresettingwithcostminimizationanalysisarandomizedcontrolledtrial |