Cargando…
Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews
Authors of Cochrane reviews are expected to update their reviews every 2 years. The updating process helps to ensure that reviews are current and include recent evidence. However, the updating process is time-consuming for authors, particularly when Cochrane methods evolve and authors are required t...
Autores principales: | Mayhew, Alain D., Kabir, Monisha, Ansari, Mohammed T. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0122-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Managing the incidence of selective reporting bias: a survey of Cochrane review groups
por: Reid, Emma K, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: an adapted PRISMA flow diagram
por: Stovold, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
por: Langendam, Miranda W, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013)