Cargando…
Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf
Imputation of genotypes in a study sample can make use of sequenced or densely genotyped external reference panels consisting of individuals that are not from the study sample. It also can employ internal reference panels, incorporating a subset of individuals from the study sample itself. Internal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26307072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.176909 |
_version_ | 1782393801043607552 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Jonathan T. L. Zhang, Peng Zöllner, Sebastian Rosenberg, Noah A. |
author_facet | Kang, Jonathan T. L. Zhang, Peng Zöllner, Sebastian Rosenberg, Noah A. |
author_sort | Kang, Jonathan T. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Imputation of genotypes in a study sample can make use of sequenced or densely genotyped external reference panels consisting of individuals that are not from the study sample. It also can employ internal reference panels, incorporating a subset of individuals from the study sample itself. Internal panels offer an advantage over external panels because they can reduce imputation errors arising from genetic dissimilarity between a population of interest and a second, distinct population from which the external reference panel has been constructed. As the cost of next-generation sequencing decreases, internal reference panel selection is becoming increasingly feasible. However, it is not clear how best to select individuals to include in such panels. We introduce a new method for selecting an internal reference panel—minimizing the average distance to the closest leaf (ADCL)—and compare its performance relative to an earlier algorithm: maximizing phylogenetic diversity (PD). Employing both simulated data and sequences from the 1000 Genomes Project, we show that ADCL provides a significant improvement in imputation accuracy, especially for imputation of sites with low-frequency alleles. This improvement in imputation accuracy is robust to changes in reference panel size, marker density, and length of the imputation target region. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4596665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45966652015-10-16 Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf Kang, Jonathan T. L. Zhang, Peng Zöllner, Sebastian Rosenberg, Noah A. Genetics Investigations Imputation of genotypes in a study sample can make use of sequenced or densely genotyped external reference panels consisting of individuals that are not from the study sample. It also can employ internal reference panels, incorporating a subset of individuals from the study sample itself. Internal panels offer an advantage over external panels because they can reduce imputation errors arising from genetic dissimilarity between a population of interest and a second, distinct population from which the external reference panel has been constructed. As the cost of next-generation sequencing decreases, internal reference panel selection is becoming increasingly feasible. However, it is not clear how best to select individuals to include in such panels. We introduce a new method for selecting an internal reference panel—minimizing the average distance to the closest leaf (ADCL)—and compare its performance relative to an earlier algorithm: maximizing phylogenetic diversity (PD). Employing both simulated data and sequences from the 1000 Genomes Project, we show that ADCL provides a significant improvement in imputation accuracy, especially for imputation of sites with low-frequency alleles. This improvement in imputation accuracy is robust to changes in reference panel size, marker density, and length of the imputation target region. Genetics Society of America 2015-10 2015-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4596665/ /pubmed/26307072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.176909 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America Available freely online through the author-supported open access option. |
spellingShingle | Investigations Kang, Jonathan T. L. Zhang, Peng Zöllner, Sebastian Rosenberg, Noah A. Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf |
title | Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf |
title_full | Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf |
title_fullStr | Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf |
title_full_unstemmed | Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf |
title_short | Choosing Subsamples for Sequencing Studies by Minimizing the Average Distance to the Closest Leaf |
title_sort | choosing subsamples for sequencing studies by minimizing the average distance to the closest leaf |
topic | Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26307072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.176909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangjonathantl choosingsubsamplesforsequencingstudiesbyminimizingtheaveragedistancetotheclosestleaf AT zhangpeng choosingsubsamplesforsequencingstudiesbyminimizingtheaveragedistancetotheclosestleaf AT zollnersebastian choosingsubsamplesforsequencingstudiesbyminimizingtheaveragedistancetotheclosestleaf AT rosenbergnoaha choosingsubsamplesforsequencingstudiesbyminimizingtheaveragedistancetotheclosestleaf |