Cargando…

Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study

OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Lif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunbar, James A, Hernan, Andrea L, Janus, Edward D, Vartiainen, Erkki, Laatikainen, Tiina, Versace, Vincent L, Reynolds, John, Best, James D, Skinner, Timothy C, O'Reilly, Sharleen L, Mc Namara, Kevin P, Stewart, Elizabeth, Coates, Michael, Bennett, Catherine M, Carter, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131
_version_ 1782393920137723904
author Dunbar, James A
Hernan, Andrea L
Janus, Edward D
Vartiainen, Erkki
Laatikainen, Tiina
Versace, Vincent L
Reynolds, John
Best, James D
Skinner, Timothy C
O'Reilly, Sharleen L
Mc Namara, Kevin P
Stewart, Elizabeth
Coates, Michael
Bennett, Catherine M
Carter, Rob
author_facet Dunbar, James A
Hernan, Andrea L
Janus, Edward D
Vartiainen, Erkki
Laatikainen, Tiina
Versace, Vincent L
Reynolds, John
Best, James D
Skinner, Timothy C
O'Reilly, Sharleen L
Mc Namara, Kevin P
Stewart, Elizabeth
Coates, Michael
Bennett, Catherine M
Carter, Rob
author_sort Dunbar, James A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (−1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (−1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (−5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (−3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was −1.08 percentage points of absolute risk (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4597415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45974152015-10-13 Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study Dunbar, James A Hernan, Andrea L Janus, Edward D Vartiainen, Erkki Laatikainen, Tiina Versace, Vincent L Reynolds, John Best, James D Skinner, Timothy C O'Reilly, Sharleen L Mc Namara, Kevin P Stewart, Elizabeth Coates, Michael Bennett, Catherine M Carter, Rob BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (−1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (−1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (−5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (−3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was −1.08 percentage points of absolute risk (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4597415/ /pubmed/26464804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health Services Research
Dunbar, James A
Hernan, Andrea L
Janus, Edward D
Vartiainen, Erkki
Laatikainen, Tiina
Versace, Vincent L
Reynolds, John
Best, James D
Skinner, Timothy C
O'Reilly, Sharleen L
Mc Namara, Kevin P
Stewart, Elizabeth
Coates, Michael
Bennett, Catherine M
Carter, Rob
Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study
title Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study
title_full Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study
title_fullStr Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study
title_full_unstemmed Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study
title_short Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study
title_sort challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study
topic Epidemiology/Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131
work_keys_str_mv AT dunbarjamesa challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT hernanandreal challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT janusedwardd challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT vartiainenerkki challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT laatikainentiina challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT versacevincentl challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT reynoldsjohn challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT bestjamesd challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT skinnertimothyc challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT oreillysharleenl challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT mcnamarakevinp challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT stewartelizabeth challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT coatesmichael challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT bennettcatherinem challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy
AT carterrob challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy