Cargando…
Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study
OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Lif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131 |
_version_ | 1782393920137723904 |
---|---|
author | Dunbar, James A Hernan, Andrea L Janus, Edward D Vartiainen, Erkki Laatikainen, Tiina Versace, Vincent L Reynolds, John Best, James D Skinner, Timothy C O'Reilly, Sharleen L Mc Namara, Kevin P Stewart, Elizabeth Coates, Michael Bennett, Catherine M Carter, Rob |
author_facet | Dunbar, James A Hernan, Andrea L Janus, Edward D Vartiainen, Erkki Laatikainen, Tiina Versace, Vincent L Reynolds, John Best, James D Skinner, Timothy C O'Reilly, Sharleen L Mc Namara, Kevin P Stewart, Elizabeth Coates, Michael Bennett, Catherine M Carter, Rob |
author_sort | Dunbar, James A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (−1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (−1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (−5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (−3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was −1.08 percentage points of absolute risk (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4597415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45974152015-10-13 Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study Dunbar, James A Hernan, Andrea L Janus, Edward D Vartiainen, Erkki Laatikainen, Tiina Versace, Vincent L Reynolds, John Best, James D Skinner, Timothy C O'Reilly, Sharleen L Mc Namara, Kevin P Stewart, Elizabeth Coates, Michael Bennett, Catherine M Carter, Rob BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (−1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (−1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (−5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (−3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was −1.08 percentage points of absolute risk (p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4597415/ /pubmed/26464804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology/Health Services Research Dunbar, James A Hernan, Andrea L Janus, Edward D Vartiainen, Erkki Laatikainen, Tiina Versace, Vincent L Reynolds, John Best, James D Skinner, Timothy C O'Reilly, Sharleen L Mc Namara, Kevin P Stewart, Elizabeth Coates, Michael Bennett, Catherine M Carter, Rob Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study |
title | Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study |
title_full | Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study |
title_fullStr | Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study |
title_short | Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study |
title_sort | challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the melbourne diabetes prevention study |
topic | Epidemiology/Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunbarjamesa challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT hernanandreal challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT janusedwardd challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT vartiainenerkki challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT laatikainentiina challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT versacevincentl challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT reynoldsjohn challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT bestjamesd challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT skinnertimothyc challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT oreillysharleenl challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT mcnamarakevinp challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT stewartelizabeth challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT coatesmichael challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT bennettcatherinem challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy AT carterrob challengesofdiabetespreventionintherealworldresultsandlessonsfromthemelbournediabetespreventionstudy |