Cargando…

A Multicenter Reliability Test of a Novel Osteochondritis Dissecans Radiographic Feature Classification System

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 30-50% of skeletally immature patients with stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the knee fail to heal with non-operative treatment, and about 30% of patients who undergo surgery fail to heal radiographically. Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to predict wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wall, Eric J., Polousky, John, Shea, Kevin G., Carey, James L., Ganley, Theodore J., Grimm, Nathan L., Jacobs, John, Edmonds, Eric W., Eismann, Emily A., Myer, Gregory D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597583/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00117
_version_ 1782393954639020032
author Wall, Eric J.
Polousky, John
Shea, Kevin G.
Carey, James L.
Ganley, Theodore J.
Grimm, Nathan L.
Jacobs, John
Edmonds, Eric W.
Eismann, Emily A.
Myer, Gregory D.
author_facet Wall, Eric J.
Polousky, John
Shea, Kevin G.
Carey, James L.
Ganley, Theodore J.
Grimm, Nathan L.
Jacobs, John
Edmonds, Eric W.
Eismann, Emily A.
Myer, Gregory D.
author_sort Wall, Eric J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Approximately 30-50% of skeletally immature patients with stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the knee fail to heal with non-operative treatment, and about 30% of patients who undergo surgery fail to heal radiographically. Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to predict which patients will heal with non-surgical or surgical treatment. We identified multiple OCD features on standard radiographs that may help to predict healing rates. In this study, we test the inter- and intra- rater reliability of orthopaedic surgeons from multiple institutions on classifying these specific OCD radiographic features. METHODS: Pre-treatment anteroposterior, lateral, and notch radiographs (Figure) of 45 pediatric knees containing OCD lesions of the medial or lateral femoral condyle were reviewed by 7 physician raters at different medical institutions at two time points. Images were viewed over a secure internet portal. Classifications included lesion location (medial/lateral), growth plate maturity (open/closing/closed), visibility of the progeny bone including fragmentation (yes/no), fragment displacement (none/partial/total), boundary (distinct/indistinct), shape (convex/linear/concave), and comparative radiodensity of the center and rim (more/same/less). Condylar width and lesion size were measured on all views. Inter-observer reliability was measured using free-marginal kappa (k(f)) and intraclass correlations. Intra-observer reliability was measured using Cohen’s kappa (k(c)), linear-weighted kappa (k(lw)), and intraclass correlations depending on measurement type. RESULTS: Inter- and intra-observer reliability were excellent for classification of lesion location (k(f)=0.96, k(c)=0.97, respectively) and skeletal maturity (ICC=0.86, k(lw)=0.84, respectively) and for measuring knee and lesion size on all views (ICC=0.92-0.98, ICC=0.84-0.95, respectively). The visibility, fragmentation, and displacement of the progeny bone were classified with substantial reliability over time (k(c)=0.67, k(c)=0.64, k(lw)=0.80, respectively) and moderate reliability between raters (k(f)=0.45, k(f)=0.54, ICC=0.52, respectively). The progeny bone boundary demonstrated substantial reliability between raters (k(f)=0.62) and moderate reliability over time (k(c)=0.55). Fair to moderate inter- and intra-observer reliability was obtained for classifying the shape (ICC=0.33, k(lw)=0.53, respectively) and comparative radiodensity of parent and progeny bone (ICC=0.11-0.52, k(lw)=0.32-0.57, respectively). CONCLUSION: Most of the specific OCD radiographic features tested showed good to excellent reliability. Lesion shape and density had only fair to moderate reliability. The results of the current study support the use of OCD radiographic feature classification in multi-center investigations. Each reliable feature may be correlated with healing in future studies and help to predict OCD outcome at the start of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4597583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45975832015-11-03 A Multicenter Reliability Test of a Novel Osteochondritis Dissecans Radiographic Feature Classification System Wall, Eric J. Polousky, John Shea, Kevin G. Carey, James L. Ganley, Theodore J. Grimm, Nathan L. Jacobs, John Edmonds, Eric W. Eismann, Emily A. Myer, Gregory D. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Approximately 30-50% of skeletally immature patients with stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the knee fail to heal with non-operative treatment, and about 30% of patients who undergo surgery fail to heal radiographically. Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to predict which patients will heal with non-surgical or surgical treatment. We identified multiple OCD features on standard radiographs that may help to predict healing rates. In this study, we test the inter- and intra- rater reliability of orthopaedic surgeons from multiple institutions on classifying these specific OCD radiographic features. METHODS: Pre-treatment anteroposterior, lateral, and notch radiographs (Figure) of 45 pediatric knees containing OCD lesions of the medial or lateral femoral condyle were reviewed by 7 physician raters at different medical institutions at two time points. Images were viewed over a secure internet portal. Classifications included lesion location (medial/lateral), growth plate maturity (open/closing/closed), visibility of the progeny bone including fragmentation (yes/no), fragment displacement (none/partial/total), boundary (distinct/indistinct), shape (convex/linear/concave), and comparative radiodensity of the center and rim (more/same/less). Condylar width and lesion size were measured on all views. Inter-observer reliability was measured using free-marginal kappa (k(f)) and intraclass correlations. Intra-observer reliability was measured using Cohen’s kappa (k(c)), linear-weighted kappa (k(lw)), and intraclass correlations depending on measurement type. RESULTS: Inter- and intra-observer reliability were excellent for classification of lesion location (k(f)=0.96, k(c)=0.97, respectively) and skeletal maturity (ICC=0.86, k(lw)=0.84, respectively) and for measuring knee and lesion size on all views (ICC=0.92-0.98, ICC=0.84-0.95, respectively). The visibility, fragmentation, and displacement of the progeny bone were classified with substantial reliability over time (k(c)=0.67, k(c)=0.64, k(lw)=0.80, respectively) and moderate reliability between raters (k(f)=0.45, k(f)=0.54, ICC=0.52, respectively). The progeny bone boundary demonstrated substantial reliability between raters (k(f)=0.62) and moderate reliability over time (k(c)=0.55). Fair to moderate inter- and intra-observer reliability was obtained for classifying the shape (ICC=0.33, k(lw)=0.53, respectively) and comparative radiodensity of parent and progeny bone (ICC=0.11-0.52, k(lw)=0.32-0.57, respectively). CONCLUSION: Most of the specific OCD radiographic features tested showed good to excellent reliability. Lesion shape and density had only fair to moderate reliability. The results of the current study support the use of OCD radiographic feature classification in multi-center investigations. Each reliable feature may be correlated with healing in future studies and help to predict OCD outcome at the start of treatment. SAGE Publications 2014-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4597583/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00117 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Wall, Eric J.
Polousky, John
Shea, Kevin G.
Carey, James L.
Ganley, Theodore J.
Grimm, Nathan L.
Jacobs, John
Edmonds, Eric W.
Eismann, Emily A.
Myer, Gregory D.
A Multicenter Reliability Test of a Novel Osteochondritis Dissecans Radiographic Feature Classification System
title A Multicenter Reliability Test of a Novel Osteochondritis Dissecans Radiographic Feature Classification System
title_full A Multicenter Reliability Test of a Novel Osteochondritis Dissecans Radiographic Feature Classification System
title_fullStr A Multicenter Reliability Test of a Novel Osteochondritis Dissecans Radiographic Feature Classification System
title_full_unstemmed A Multicenter Reliability Test of a Novel Osteochondritis Dissecans Radiographic Feature Classification System
title_short A Multicenter Reliability Test of a Novel Osteochondritis Dissecans Radiographic Feature Classification System
title_sort multicenter reliability test of a novel osteochondritis dissecans radiographic feature classification system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597583/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00117
work_keys_str_mv AT wallericj amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT polouskyjohn amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT sheakeving amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT careyjamesl amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT ganleytheodorej amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT grimmnathanl amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT jacobsjohn amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT edmondsericw amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT eismannemilya amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT myergregoryd amulticenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT wallericj multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT polouskyjohn multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT sheakeving multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT careyjamesl multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT ganleytheodorej multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT grimmnathanl multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT jacobsjohn multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT edmondsericw multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT eismannemilya multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem
AT myergregoryd multicenterreliabilitytestofanovelosteochondritisdissecansradiographicfeatureclassificationsystem