Cargando…

How Consistent are the MRI Findings and the Clinical Outcomes after Meniscus Repair?

OBJECTIVES: The meniscal repair is a preferred treatment whenever possible after meniscus tear. There are reports in the literature that MRI assessment is not useful to evaluate healing of the meniscus after repair. However, we have not found any study which compares the clinical outcomes of meniscu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bombaci, Hasan, Cetinkaya, Fatih, Meric, Kaan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597629/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00132
_version_ 1782393963098931200
author Bombaci, Hasan
Cetinkaya, Fatih
Meric, Kaan
author_facet Bombaci, Hasan
Cetinkaya, Fatih
Meric, Kaan
author_sort Bombaci, Hasan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The meniscal repair is a preferred treatment whenever possible after meniscus tear. There are reports in the literature that MRI assessment is not useful to evaluate healing of the meniscus after repair. However, we have not found any study which compares the clinical outcomes of meniscus repair according to the MRI findings. The purpose of this study was to compare the MRI features and the clinical outcomes after meniscus repair. METHODS: 32 patients underwent meniscus repair between January 2011 and June 2013. Twenty three of them accepted a control MRI examination at last follow-up visit. One patient was more than 130 kg in weight so it was not possible to perform MRI examination in our institution. Therefore, twenty-two patients (17 male, 5 female) were included in this study. The mean age was 31.81 (18-48). Preoperative clinical and radiological findings were obtained from the hospital registry. At last follow-up, the clinical examination and MRI assessment were performed. The results were compared statistically with the ANOVA method. RESULTS: MRI assessment, obtained at the last follow-up, was performed blindly by the radiology specialist and senior surgeon and any conflicts between the two assessments were settled by using the preoperative MRI findings. In 10 patients (45.45%), the MRI examination revealed normal/nearly normal meniscal signal alteration, in three (13.64%), incomplete tear and in nine (40.91%), a vertical/complex tear signal located in the previously torn meniscus area. Post-operatively the mean Lysholm score was 91.40±10.57 and Tegner activity score, 4.59±1.62. Also, the Lysholm score (91.5±12.44, 94.33±5.50 and 90.33±10.34, respectively) and Tegner activity score (4.2±1.87, 6±1.00 and 4.5±1.33, respectively) were evaluated in each group separately, however the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: In the present study, there was no correlation between the MRI signals and clinical outcomes. The Lysholm score was found to be over 90 in 20 of the 22 knees in this series. In conclusion, the findings reveal that the meniscus fulfills its function as normal or nearly normal even though the MRI findings fail to prove healing, in the mean 19. 5 months’ period postoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4597629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45976292015-11-03 How Consistent are the MRI Findings and the Clinical Outcomes after Meniscus Repair? Bombaci, Hasan Cetinkaya, Fatih Meric, Kaan Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The meniscal repair is a preferred treatment whenever possible after meniscus tear. There are reports in the literature that MRI assessment is not useful to evaluate healing of the meniscus after repair. However, we have not found any study which compares the clinical outcomes of meniscus repair according to the MRI findings. The purpose of this study was to compare the MRI features and the clinical outcomes after meniscus repair. METHODS: 32 patients underwent meniscus repair between January 2011 and June 2013. Twenty three of them accepted a control MRI examination at last follow-up visit. One patient was more than 130 kg in weight so it was not possible to perform MRI examination in our institution. Therefore, twenty-two patients (17 male, 5 female) were included in this study. The mean age was 31.81 (18-48). Preoperative clinical and radiological findings were obtained from the hospital registry. At last follow-up, the clinical examination and MRI assessment were performed. The results were compared statistically with the ANOVA method. RESULTS: MRI assessment, obtained at the last follow-up, was performed blindly by the radiology specialist and senior surgeon and any conflicts between the two assessments were settled by using the preoperative MRI findings. In 10 patients (45.45%), the MRI examination revealed normal/nearly normal meniscal signal alteration, in three (13.64%), incomplete tear and in nine (40.91%), a vertical/complex tear signal located in the previously torn meniscus area. Post-operatively the mean Lysholm score was 91.40±10.57 and Tegner activity score, 4.59±1.62. Also, the Lysholm score (91.5±12.44, 94.33±5.50 and 90.33±10.34, respectively) and Tegner activity score (4.2±1.87, 6±1.00 and 4.5±1.33, respectively) were evaluated in each group separately, however the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: In the present study, there was no correlation between the MRI signals and clinical outcomes. The Lysholm score was found to be over 90 in 20 of the 22 knees in this series. In conclusion, the findings reveal that the meniscus fulfills its function as normal or nearly normal even though the MRI findings fail to prove healing, in the mean 19. 5 months’ period postoperatively. SAGE Publications 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4597629/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00132 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Bombaci, Hasan
Cetinkaya, Fatih
Meric, Kaan
How Consistent are the MRI Findings and the Clinical Outcomes after Meniscus Repair?
title How Consistent are the MRI Findings and the Clinical Outcomes after Meniscus Repair?
title_full How Consistent are the MRI Findings and the Clinical Outcomes after Meniscus Repair?
title_fullStr How Consistent are the MRI Findings and the Clinical Outcomes after Meniscus Repair?
title_full_unstemmed How Consistent are the MRI Findings and the Clinical Outcomes after Meniscus Repair?
title_short How Consistent are the MRI Findings and the Clinical Outcomes after Meniscus Repair?
title_sort how consistent are the mri findings and the clinical outcomes after meniscus repair?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597629/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00132
work_keys_str_mv AT bombacihasan howconsistentarethemrifindingsandtheclinicaloutcomesaftermeniscusrepair
AT cetinkayafatih howconsistentarethemrifindingsandtheclinicaloutcomesaftermeniscusrepair
AT merickaan howconsistentarethemrifindingsandtheclinicaloutcomesaftermeniscusrepair