Cargando…

Comparison of Ankle Proprioception Between Blind and Healthy Athletes

OBJECTIVES: The positive effect of the visual sensation on the proprioceptive quality is well known. Although other senses of the congenital blind individuals have been proven to be increased more than healthy ones, there has been no data about the proprioceptive quality of congenital blind persons....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Özer, Muhammet, Kaynak, Haydar, Atik, Aziz, Şilil, Mehtap Kaçmaz, Altun, Muammer, Akseki, Devrim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597653/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00156
_version_ 1782393968718249984
author Özer, Muhammet
Kaynak, Haydar
Atik, Aziz
Şilil, Mehtap Kaçmaz
Altun, Muammer
Akseki, Devrim
author_facet Özer, Muhammet
Kaynak, Haydar
Atik, Aziz
Şilil, Mehtap Kaçmaz
Altun, Muammer
Akseki, Devrim
author_sort Özer, Muhammet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The positive effect of the visual sensation on the proprioceptive quality is well known. Although other senses of the congenital blind individuals have been proven to be increased more than healthy ones, there has been no data about the proprioceptive quality of congenital blind persons. The aim of this study is to determine the quality of ankle proprioception in congenital blind athletes. METHODS: 15 congenital blind athletes (10 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 24 ± 2.9 (ranging from 20 to 29), and 15 healthy athletes (10 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 24.6 ± 3.05 (ranging from 20 to 29), from the same athletic department, were included in the study. Proprioception was evaluated by using the technique of joint position sense, and absolut errors during the reproduction of six target angles (plantar flexion 100, dorsiflexion 50, inversion 100 and 200, eversion 100 and 200) were detected in dominant and nondominant ankles of both groups. Athletes were measured both eyes open and closed. Statistical analysis was done by using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. RESULTS: When dominant extremities were compared while eyes open, there was only a difference in 50 dorsiflexion measurements statistically in favor of blind ones (p<0.05). When dominant extremities were compared while eyes closed, blind athletes got less wrong in four of the six target angles statistically (p<0.01), when non-dominant extremities were compared while eyes closed, blind athletes got less wrong in all angles statistically (p<0.01). The ankle proprioception of the blind athletes were better then the normal athletes. The ankle propriceptions of the normal athletes further deteriorated when their eyes were closed. CONCLUSION: We found that the ankle proprioceptions of congenital blind athletes were better than the normal athletes. So additional closed-eyes exercises can help to reach a high proprioceptive level of athletes in a normal season which in terms may decrease accidental traumas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4597653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45976532015-11-03 Comparison of Ankle Proprioception Between Blind and Healthy Athletes Özer, Muhammet Kaynak, Haydar Atik, Aziz Şilil, Mehtap Kaçmaz Altun, Muammer Akseki, Devrim Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The positive effect of the visual sensation on the proprioceptive quality is well known. Although other senses of the congenital blind individuals have been proven to be increased more than healthy ones, there has been no data about the proprioceptive quality of congenital blind persons. The aim of this study is to determine the quality of ankle proprioception in congenital blind athletes. METHODS: 15 congenital blind athletes (10 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 24 ± 2.9 (ranging from 20 to 29), and 15 healthy athletes (10 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 24.6 ± 3.05 (ranging from 20 to 29), from the same athletic department, were included in the study. Proprioception was evaluated by using the technique of joint position sense, and absolut errors during the reproduction of six target angles (plantar flexion 100, dorsiflexion 50, inversion 100 and 200, eversion 100 and 200) were detected in dominant and nondominant ankles of both groups. Athletes were measured both eyes open and closed. Statistical analysis was done by using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. RESULTS: When dominant extremities were compared while eyes open, there was only a difference in 50 dorsiflexion measurements statistically in favor of blind ones (p<0.05). When dominant extremities were compared while eyes closed, blind athletes got less wrong in four of the six target angles statistically (p<0.01), when non-dominant extremities were compared while eyes closed, blind athletes got less wrong in all angles statistically (p<0.01). The ankle proprioception of the blind athletes were better then the normal athletes. The ankle propriceptions of the normal athletes further deteriorated when their eyes were closed. CONCLUSION: We found that the ankle proprioceptions of congenital blind athletes were better than the normal athletes. So additional closed-eyes exercises can help to reach a high proprioceptive level of athletes in a normal season which in terms may decrease accidental traumas. SAGE Publications 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4597653/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00156 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Özer, Muhammet
Kaynak, Haydar
Atik, Aziz
Şilil, Mehtap Kaçmaz
Altun, Muammer
Akseki, Devrim
Comparison of Ankle Proprioception Between Blind and Healthy Athletes
title Comparison of Ankle Proprioception Between Blind and Healthy Athletes
title_full Comparison of Ankle Proprioception Between Blind and Healthy Athletes
title_fullStr Comparison of Ankle Proprioception Between Blind and Healthy Athletes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ankle Proprioception Between Blind and Healthy Athletes
title_short Comparison of Ankle Proprioception Between Blind and Healthy Athletes
title_sort comparison of ankle proprioception between blind and healthy athletes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597653/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00156
work_keys_str_mv AT ozermuhammet comparisonofankleproprioceptionbetweenblindandhealthyathletes
AT kaynakhaydar comparisonofankleproprioceptionbetweenblindandhealthyathletes
AT atikaziz comparisonofankleproprioceptionbetweenblindandhealthyathletes
AT sililmehtapkacmaz comparisonofankleproprioceptionbetweenblindandhealthyathletes
AT altunmuammer comparisonofankleproprioceptionbetweenblindandhealthyathletes
AT aksekidevrim comparisonofankleproprioceptionbetweenblindandhealthyathletes