Cargando…

The use of an Accesory Medial Portal in Anatomic ACL Reconstruction a Prospective Ct- Study

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if any differences exist regarding the position and the length of the femoral tunnel between the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with the use of an accessory medial portal and the ACLR with no use of accessory medial portal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chouliaras, Vasileios Theodore, Bellos, Konstantinos, Flevas, Dimitris, Tsaggou, Vasiliki, Kavalaris, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597723/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00226
_version_ 1782393985003683840
author Chouliaras, Vasileios Theodore
Bellos, Konstantinos
Flevas, Dimitris
Tsaggou, Vasiliki
Kavalaris, George
author_facet Chouliaras, Vasileios Theodore
Bellos, Konstantinos
Flevas, Dimitris
Tsaggou, Vasiliki
Kavalaris, George
author_sort Chouliaras, Vasileios Theodore
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if any differences exist regarding the position and the length of the femoral tunnel between the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with the use of an accessory medial portal and the ACLR with no use of accessory medial portal using computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients that underwent ACLR with the aid of an accessory medial portal (Group A) and 25 ACL-reconstructed (ACL-R) patients with no use of the accessory medial portal (Group B) formed the two study groups. The femoral tunnel angle (FTA) was measured on CT and the femoral tunnel length (FTL) was measured intraoperatively. Unpaired t-tests were used to examine differences regarding FTA and FTL between the two groups. The level of significance was set at α=0.05. RESULTS: Mean group values (range, standard deviation) for FTA were 33.9º (30º - 41º, 2.9º) and 48.2º (43º - 59º, 4.4 º) and for FTL 36.2mm (30-39, 2.4) and 44.2mm (39-48, 3) for groups A and B respectively (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: With the use of an accessory medial portal the femoral tunnel is placed in a more oblique position in coronal plane as compared to the conventional AM portal technique, closer to the real anatomical position of the posterolateral bundle. Additionally the femoral tunnel length with this new technique is shorter than this with the AM portal but long enough for using the smaller button which has been proposed to reduce the motion of the graft within the tunnel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4597723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45977232015-11-03 The use of an Accesory Medial Portal in Anatomic ACL Reconstruction a Prospective Ct- Study Chouliaras, Vasileios Theodore Bellos, Konstantinos Flevas, Dimitris Tsaggou, Vasiliki Kavalaris, George Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if any differences exist regarding the position and the length of the femoral tunnel between the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with the use of an accessory medial portal and the ACLR with no use of accessory medial portal using computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients that underwent ACLR with the aid of an accessory medial portal (Group A) and 25 ACL-reconstructed (ACL-R) patients with no use of the accessory medial portal (Group B) formed the two study groups. The femoral tunnel angle (FTA) was measured on CT and the femoral tunnel length (FTL) was measured intraoperatively. Unpaired t-tests were used to examine differences regarding FTA and FTL between the two groups. The level of significance was set at α=0.05. RESULTS: Mean group values (range, standard deviation) for FTA were 33.9º (30º - 41º, 2.9º) and 48.2º (43º - 59º, 4.4 º) and for FTL 36.2mm (30-39, 2.4) and 44.2mm (39-48, 3) for groups A and B respectively (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: With the use of an accessory medial portal the femoral tunnel is placed in a more oblique position in coronal plane as compared to the conventional AM portal technique, closer to the real anatomical position of the posterolateral bundle. Additionally the femoral tunnel length with this new technique is shorter than this with the AM portal but long enough for using the smaller button which has been proposed to reduce the motion of the graft within the tunnel. SAGE Publications 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4597723/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00226 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Chouliaras, Vasileios Theodore
Bellos, Konstantinos
Flevas, Dimitris
Tsaggou, Vasiliki
Kavalaris, George
The use of an Accesory Medial Portal in Anatomic ACL Reconstruction a Prospective Ct- Study
title The use of an Accesory Medial Portal in Anatomic ACL Reconstruction a Prospective Ct- Study
title_full The use of an Accesory Medial Portal in Anatomic ACL Reconstruction a Prospective Ct- Study
title_fullStr The use of an Accesory Medial Portal in Anatomic ACL Reconstruction a Prospective Ct- Study
title_full_unstemmed The use of an Accesory Medial Portal in Anatomic ACL Reconstruction a Prospective Ct- Study
title_short The use of an Accesory Medial Portal in Anatomic ACL Reconstruction a Prospective Ct- Study
title_sort use of an accesory medial portal in anatomic acl reconstruction a prospective ct- study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597723/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00226
work_keys_str_mv AT chouliarasvasileiostheodore theuseofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT belloskonstantinos theuseofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT flevasdimitris theuseofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT tsaggouvasiliki theuseofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT kavalarisgeorge theuseofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT chouliarasvasileiostheodore useofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT belloskonstantinos useofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT flevasdimitris useofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT tsaggouvasiliki useofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy
AT kavalarisgeorge useofanaccesorymedialportalinanatomicaclreconstructionaprospectivectstudy