Cargando…

Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in Dutch clinical practice: a survey study

BACKGROUND: The Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) is an observational clinical measure designed to evaluate gross motor function in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). It is a shortened version of the GMFM-88. A free computer program, the Gross Motor Ability Estimator (GMAE), is required to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beckers, Laura WME, Bastiaenen, Caroline HG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0459-8
_version_ 1782393992647802880
author Beckers, Laura WME
Bastiaenen, Caroline HG
author_facet Beckers, Laura WME
Bastiaenen, Caroline HG
author_sort Beckers, Laura WME
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) is an observational clinical measure designed to evaluate gross motor function in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). It is a shortened version of the GMFM-88. A free computer program, the Gross Motor Ability Estimator (GMAE), is required to calculate the interval level total score of the GMFM-66. The aim of this study was to explore pediatric physiotherapists’ experiences with the GMFM-66 and application of the measure in Dutch clinical practice. METHODS: An explorative cross-sectional survey study was performed. Dutch pediatric physiotherapists were invited to complete an online survey. Data-analysis merely consisted of frequency tables, cross-tabulations and data-driven qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-six respondents were included in the analysis. In general, the therapists expressed a positive opinion on the GMFM-66, in particular regarding its user-friendly administration and benefits of the GMAE. The majority of questions revealed that therapists deviate from the guidelines provided by the manual to a greater or lesser extent though. The most worrisome finding was that 28.8 % (15/52) of the therapists calculate the total score of the GMFM-66 using the score form of the GMFM-88 instead of the GMAE. DISCUSSION: The consequences of the high number of therapists who stated that they calculate the total score of the GMFM-66 with the GMFM-88 score form are far-reaching; it has a misleading impact on the opinion of rehabilitation teams and parents on the development of the child, on decision-making in rehabilitation, and ultimately on the development of the child. CONCLUSIONS: Information currently available on psychometric properties, motor growth curves and percentiles cannot be generalized to clinical practice in the Netherlands, as they were generated in highly controlled testing conditions, which do not hold in clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-015-0459-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4597756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45977562015-10-09 Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in Dutch clinical practice: a survey study Beckers, Laura WME Bastiaenen, Caroline HG BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) is an observational clinical measure designed to evaluate gross motor function in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). It is a shortened version of the GMFM-88. A free computer program, the Gross Motor Ability Estimator (GMAE), is required to calculate the interval level total score of the GMFM-66. The aim of this study was to explore pediatric physiotherapists’ experiences with the GMFM-66 and application of the measure in Dutch clinical practice. METHODS: An explorative cross-sectional survey study was performed. Dutch pediatric physiotherapists were invited to complete an online survey. Data-analysis merely consisted of frequency tables, cross-tabulations and data-driven qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-six respondents were included in the analysis. In general, the therapists expressed a positive opinion on the GMFM-66, in particular regarding its user-friendly administration and benefits of the GMAE. The majority of questions revealed that therapists deviate from the guidelines provided by the manual to a greater or lesser extent though. The most worrisome finding was that 28.8 % (15/52) of the therapists calculate the total score of the GMFM-66 using the score form of the GMFM-88 instead of the GMAE. DISCUSSION: The consequences of the high number of therapists who stated that they calculate the total score of the GMFM-66 with the GMFM-88 score form are far-reaching; it has a misleading impact on the opinion of rehabilitation teams and parents on the development of the child, on decision-making in rehabilitation, and ultimately on the development of the child. CONCLUSIONS: Information currently available on psychometric properties, motor growth curves and percentiles cannot be generalized to clinical practice in the Netherlands, as they were generated in highly controlled testing conditions, which do not hold in clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-015-0459-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4597756/ /pubmed/26445947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0459-8 Text en © Beckers and Bastiaenen. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beckers, Laura WME
Bastiaenen, Caroline HG
Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in Dutch clinical practice: a survey study
title Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in Dutch clinical practice: a survey study
title_full Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in Dutch clinical practice: a survey study
title_fullStr Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in Dutch clinical practice: a survey study
title_full_unstemmed Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in Dutch clinical practice: a survey study
title_short Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) in Dutch clinical practice: a survey study
title_sort application of the gross motor function measure-66 (gmfm-66) in dutch clinical practice: a survey study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0459-8
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerslaurawme applicationofthegrossmotorfunctionmeasure66gmfm66indutchclinicalpracticeasurveystudy
AT bastiaenencarolinehg applicationofthegrossmotorfunctionmeasure66gmfm66indutchclinicalpracticeasurveystudy