Cargando…
Genetic Relationship in Cicer Sp. Expose Evidence for Geneflow between the Cultigen and Its Wild Progenitor
There is a debate concerning mono- or poly-phyletic origins of the Near Eastern crops. In parallel, some authors claim that domestication was not possible within the natural range of the wild progenitors due to wild alleles flow into the nascent crops. Here we address both, the mono- or poly-phyleti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139789 |
_version_ | 1782394016055164928 |
---|---|
author | van Oss, Ruth Abbo, Shahal Eshed, Ravit Sherman, Amir Coyne, Clarice J. Vandemark, George J. Zhang, Hong-Bin Peleg, Zvi |
author_facet | van Oss, Ruth Abbo, Shahal Eshed, Ravit Sherman, Amir Coyne, Clarice J. Vandemark, George J. Zhang, Hong-Bin Peleg, Zvi |
author_sort | van Oss, Ruth |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a debate concerning mono- or poly-phyletic origins of the Near Eastern crops. In parallel, some authors claim that domestication was not possible within the natural range of the wild progenitors due to wild alleles flow into the nascent crops. Here we address both, the mono- or poly-phyletic origins and the domestications within or without the natural range of the progenitor, debates in order to understand the relationship between domesticated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its wild progenitor (C. reticulatum Ladizinsky) with special emphasis on its domestication centre in southeastern Turkey. A set of 103 chickpea cultivars and landraces from the major growing regions alongside wild accessions (C. reticulatum, C. echinospermum P.H Davis and C. bijugum K.H. Rech) sampled across the natural distribution range in eastern Turkey were genotyped with 194 SNPs markers. The genetic affinities between and within the studied taxa were assessed. The analysis suggests a mono-phyletic origin of the cultigen, with several wild accession as likely members of the wild stock of the cultigen. Clear separation between the wild and domesticated germplasm was apparent, with negligible level of admixture. A single C. reticulatum accession shows morphological and allelic signatures of admixture, a likely result of introgression. No evidence of geneflow from the wild into domesticated germplasm was found. The traditional farming systems of southeaster Turkey are characterized by occurrence of sympatric wild progenitor—domesticated forms of chickpea (and likewise cereals and other grain legumes). Therefore, both the authentic crop landraces and the wild populations native to the area are a unique genetic resource. Our results grant support to the notion of domestication within the natural distribution range of the wild progenitor, suggesting that the Neolithic domesticators were fully capable of selecting the desired phenotypes even when facing rare wild-domesticated introgression events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4597980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45979802015-10-20 Genetic Relationship in Cicer Sp. Expose Evidence for Geneflow between the Cultigen and Its Wild Progenitor van Oss, Ruth Abbo, Shahal Eshed, Ravit Sherman, Amir Coyne, Clarice J. Vandemark, George J. Zhang, Hong-Bin Peleg, Zvi PLoS One Research Article There is a debate concerning mono- or poly-phyletic origins of the Near Eastern crops. In parallel, some authors claim that domestication was not possible within the natural range of the wild progenitors due to wild alleles flow into the nascent crops. Here we address both, the mono- or poly-phyletic origins and the domestications within or without the natural range of the progenitor, debates in order to understand the relationship between domesticated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its wild progenitor (C. reticulatum Ladizinsky) with special emphasis on its domestication centre in southeastern Turkey. A set of 103 chickpea cultivars and landraces from the major growing regions alongside wild accessions (C. reticulatum, C. echinospermum P.H Davis and C. bijugum K.H. Rech) sampled across the natural distribution range in eastern Turkey were genotyped with 194 SNPs markers. The genetic affinities between and within the studied taxa were assessed. The analysis suggests a mono-phyletic origin of the cultigen, with several wild accession as likely members of the wild stock of the cultigen. Clear separation between the wild and domesticated germplasm was apparent, with negligible level of admixture. A single C. reticulatum accession shows morphological and allelic signatures of admixture, a likely result of introgression. No evidence of geneflow from the wild into domesticated germplasm was found. The traditional farming systems of southeaster Turkey are characterized by occurrence of sympatric wild progenitor—domesticated forms of chickpea (and likewise cereals and other grain legumes). Therefore, both the authentic crop landraces and the wild populations native to the area are a unique genetic resource. Our results grant support to the notion of domestication within the natural distribution range of the wild progenitor, suggesting that the Neolithic domesticators were fully capable of selecting the desired phenotypes even when facing rare wild-domesticated introgression events. Public Library of Science 2015-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4597980/ /pubmed/26447951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139789 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Oss, Ruth Abbo, Shahal Eshed, Ravit Sherman, Amir Coyne, Clarice J. Vandemark, George J. Zhang, Hong-Bin Peleg, Zvi Genetic Relationship in Cicer Sp. Expose Evidence for Geneflow between the Cultigen and Its Wild Progenitor |
title | Genetic Relationship in Cicer Sp. Expose Evidence for Geneflow between the Cultigen and Its Wild Progenitor |
title_full | Genetic Relationship in Cicer Sp. Expose Evidence for Geneflow between the Cultigen and Its Wild Progenitor |
title_fullStr | Genetic Relationship in Cicer Sp. Expose Evidence for Geneflow between the Cultigen and Its Wild Progenitor |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic Relationship in Cicer Sp. Expose Evidence for Geneflow between the Cultigen and Its Wild Progenitor |
title_short | Genetic Relationship in Cicer Sp. Expose Evidence for Geneflow between the Cultigen and Its Wild Progenitor |
title_sort | genetic relationship in cicer sp. expose evidence for geneflow between the cultigen and its wild progenitor |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139789 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanossruth geneticrelationshipincicerspexposeevidenceforgeneflowbetweenthecultigenanditswildprogenitor AT abboshahal geneticrelationshipincicerspexposeevidenceforgeneflowbetweenthecultigenanditswildprogenitor AT eshedravit geneticrelationshipincicerspexposeevidenceforgeneflowbetweenthecultigenanditswildprogenitor AT shermanamir geneticrelationshipincicerspexposeevidenceforgeneflowbetweenthecultigenanditswildprogenitor AT coyneclaricej geneticrelationshipincicerspexposeevidenceforgeneflowbetweenthecultigenanditswildprogenitor AT vandemarkgeorgej geneticrelationshipincicerspexposeevidenceforgeneflowbetweenthecultigenanditswildprogenitor AT zhanghongbin geneticrelationshipincicerspexposeevidenceforgeneflowbetweenthecultigenanditswildprogenitor AT pelegzvi geneticrelationshipincicerspexposeevidenceforgeneflowbetweenthecultigenanditswildprogenitor |