Cargando…

Reliability of Two Diameters Method in Determining Acute Infarct Size. Validation as New Imaging Biomarker

BACKGROUND: In order to select patients most likely to benefit for thrombolysis and to predict patient outcome in acute ischemic stroke, the volumetric assessment of the infarcted tissue is used. However, infarct volume estimation on Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) has moderate interrater variabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiebach, Jochen B., Stief, Jonas D., Ganeshan, Ramanan, Hotter, Benjamin, Ostwaldt, Ann-Christin, Nolte, Christian H., Villringer, Kersten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140065
_version_ 1782394046546706432
author Fiebach, Jochen B.
Stief, Jonas D.
Ganeshan, Ramanan
Hotter, Benjamin
Ostwaldt, Ann-Christin
Nolte, Christian H.
Villringer, Kersten
author_facet Fiebach, Jochen B.
Stief, Jonas D.
Ganeshan, Ramanan
Hotter, Benjamin
Ostwaldt, Ann-Christin
Nolte, Christian H.
Villringer, Kersten
author_sort Fiebach, Jochen B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to select patients most likely to benefit for thrombolysis and to predict patient outcome in acute ischemic stroke, the volumetric assessment of the infarcted tissue is used. However, infarct volume estimation on Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) has moderate interrater variability despite the excellent contrast between ischemic lesion and healthy tissue. In this study, we compared volumetric measurements of DWI hyperintensity to a simple maximum orthogonal diameter approach to identify thresholds indicating infarct size >70 ml and >100 ml. METHODS: Patients presenting with ischemic stroke with an NIHSS of ≥ 8 were examined with stroke MRI within 24 h after symptom onset. For assessment of the orthogonal DWI lesion diameters (od-values) the image with the largest lesion appearance was chosen. The maximal diameter of the lesion was determined and a second diameter was measured perpendicular. Both diameters were multiplied. Od-values were compared to volumetric measurement and od-value thresholds identifying a lesion size of > 70 ml and > 100 ml were determined. In a selected dataset with an even distribution of lesion sizes we compared the results of the od value thresholds with results of the ABC/2 and estimations of lesion volumes made by two resident physicians. RESULTS: For 108 included patients (53 female, mean age 71.36 years) with a median infarct volume of 13.4 ml we found an excellent correlation between volumetric measures and od-values (r2 = 0.951). Infarct volume >100 ml corresponds to an od-value cut off of 42; > 70 ml corresponds to an od-value of 32. In the compiled dataset (n = 50) od-value thresholds identified infarcts > 100 ml / > 70 ml with a sensitivity of 90%/ 93% and with a specificity of 98%/ 89%. The od-value offered a higher accuracy in identifying large infarctions compared to both visual estimations and the ABC/2 method. CONCLUSION: The simple od-value enables identification of large DWI lesions in acute stroke. The cutoff of 42 is useful to identify large infarctions with volume larger than 100 ml. Further studies can analyze the therapeutic utility of this new method. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.org NCT00715533
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4598169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45981692015-10-20 Reliability of Two Diameters Method in Determining Acute Infarct Size. Validation as New Imaging Biomarker Fiebach, Jochen B. Stief, Jonas D. Ganeshan, Ramanan Hotter, Benjamin Ostwaldt, Ann-Christin Nolte, Christian H. Villringer, Kersten PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In order to select patients most likely to benefit for thrombolysis and to predict patient outcome in acute ischemic stroke, the volumetric assessment of the infarcted tissue is used. However, infarct volume estimation on Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) has moderate interrater variability despite the excellent contrast between ischemic lesion and healthy tissue. In this study, we compared volumetric measurements of DWI hyperintensity to a simple maximum orthogonal diameter approach to identify thresholds indicating infarct size >70 ml and >100 ml. METHODS: Patients presenting with ischemic stroke with an NIHSS of ≥ 8 were examined with stroke MRI within 24 h after symptom onset. For assessment of the orthogonal DWI lesion diameters (od-values) the image with the largest lesion appearance was chosen. The maximal diameter of the lesion was determined and a second diameter was measured perpendicular. Both diameters were multiplied. Od-values were compared to volumetric measurement and od-value thresholds identifying a lesion size of > 70 ml and > 100 ml were determined. In a selected dataset with an even distribution of lesion sizes we compared the results of the od value thresholds with results of the ABC/2 and estimations of lesion volumes made by two resident physicians. RESULTS: For 108 included patients (53 female, mean age 71.36 years) with a median infarct volume of 13.4 ml we found an excellent correlation between volumetric measures and od-values (r2 = 0.951). Infarct volume >100 ml corresponds to an od-value cut off of 42; > 70 ml corresponds to an od-value of 32. In the compiled dataset (n = 50) od-value thresholds identified infarcts > 100 ml / > 70 ml with a sensitivity of 90%/ 93% and with a specificity of 98%/ 89%. The od-value offered a higher accuracy in identifying large infarctions compared to both visual estimations and the ABC/2 method. CONCLUSION: The simple od-value enables identification of large DWI lesions in acute stroke. The cutoff of 42 is useful to identify large infarctions with volume larger than 100 ml. Further studies can analyze the therapeutic utility of this new method. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.org NCT00715533 Public Library of Science 2015-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4598169/ /pubmed/26447761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140065 Text en © 2015 Fiebach et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Stief, Jonas D.
Ganeshan, Ramanan
Hotter, Benjamin
Ostwaldt, Ann-Christin
Nolte, Christian H.
Villringer, Kersten
Reliability of Two Diameters Method in Determining Acute Infarct Size. Validation as New Imaging Biomarker
title Reliability of Two Diameters Method in Determining Acute Infarct Size. Validation as New Imaging Biomarker
title_full Reliability of Two Diameters Method in Determining Acute Infarct Size. Validation as New Imaging Biomarker
title_fullStr Reliability of Two Diameters Method in Determining Acute Infarct Size. Validation as New Imaging Biomarker
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Two Diameters Method in Determining Acute Infarct Size. Validation as New Imaging Biomarker
title_short Reliability of Two Diameters Method in Determining Acute Infarct Size. Validation as New Imaging Biomarker
title_sort reliability of two diameters method in determining acute infarct size. validation as new imaging biomarker
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140065
work_keys_str_mv AT fiebachjochenb reliabilityoftwodiametersmethodindeterminingacuteinfarctsizevalidationasnewimagingbiomarker
AT stiefjonasd reliabilityoftwodiametersmethodindeterminingacuteinfarctsizevalidationasnewimagingbiomarker
AT ganeshanramanan reliabilityoftwodiametersmethodindeterminingacuteinfarctsizevalidationasnewimagingbiomarker
AT hotterbenjamin reliabilityoftwodiametersmethodindeterminingacuteinfarctsizevalidationasnewimagingbiomarker
AT ostwaldtannchristin reliabilityoftwodiametersmethodindeterminingacuteinfarctsizevalidationasnewimagingbiomarker
AT noltechristianh reliabilityoftwodiametersmethodindeterminingacuteinfarctsizevalidationasnewimagingbiomarker
AT villringerkersten reliabilityoftwodiametersmethodindeterminingacuteinfarctsizevalidationasnewimagingbiomarker