Cargando…

Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children

BACKGROUND: Direct neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting interposition and neurotization are the options for nerve repair in children, whereas few reports about using nerve conduits (tubulization) are referred to pediatrics in the literature. The authors present their experience about nerve repairing by mean...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sénès, Filippo Maria, Catena, Nunzio, Sénès, Jacopo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538763
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.164045
_version_ 1782394085504450560
author Sénès, Filippo Maria
Catena, Nunzio
Sénès, Jacopo
author_facet Sénès, Filippo Maria
Catena, Nunzio
Sénès, Jacopo
author_sort Sénès, Filippo Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting interposition and neurotization are the options for nerve repair in children, whereas few reports about using nerve conduits (tubulization) are referred to pediatrics in the literature. The authors present their experience about nerve repairing by means of nerve tubes during the developmental age when the harvesting of nerve grafts and also vein grafts of adequate caliber for bridging nerve defects is difficult. A critical review of their case series offers indications for using nerve conduits in pediatrics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients were treated using the nerve tubulization; nine patients were affected by obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) while six were suffering from peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs). RESULTS: In patients suffering from OBPP, we observed 1 good, 3 fair and 5 bad results. In the PNI group, we observed 4 patients who had good results while only 2 had a bad outcome. No fair results were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In peripheral nerve repairing in children by using nerve conduits, the outcome has been widely effective even when dealing with mixed and motor nerve, thus nerve tubulization might be considered as an alternative to nerve grafting. Conversely, considering the uncertain result obtained in brachial plexus repairing, the conduits cannot be considered as a first choice of treatment in brachial plexus reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4598548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45985482015-11-04 Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children Sénès, Filippo Maria Catena, Nunzio Sénès, Jacopo Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Direct neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting interposition and neurotization are the options for nerve repair in children, whereas few reports about using nerve conduits (tubulization) are referred to pediatrics in the literature. The authors present their experience about nerve repairing by means of nerve tubes during the developmental age when the harvesting of nerve grafts and also vein grafts of adequate caliber for bridging nerve defects is difficult. A critical review of their case series offers indications for using nerve conduits in pediatrics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients were treated using the nerve tubulization; nine patients were affected by obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) while six were suffering from peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs). RESULTS: In patients suffering from OBPP, we observed 1 good, 3 fair and 5 bad results. In the PNI group, we observed 4 patients who had good results while only 2 had a bad outcome. No fair results were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In peripheral nerve repairing in children by using nerve conduits, the outcome has been widely effective even when dealing with mixed and motor nerve, thus nerve tubulization might be considered as an alternative to nerve grafting. Conversely, considering the uncertain result obtained in brachial plexus repairing, the conduits cannot be considered as a first choice of treatment in brachial plexus reconstruction. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4598548/ /pubmed/26538763 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.164045 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
spellingShingle Original Article
Sénès, Filippo Maria
Catena, Nunzio
Sénès, Jacopo
Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children
title Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children
title_full Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children
title_fullStr Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children
title_full_unstemmed Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children
title_short Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children
title_sort use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26538763
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.164045
work_keys_str_mv AT senesfilippomaria useoftubulizationnerveconduitsinrepairingnervedefectsinchildren
AT catenanunzio useoftubulizationnerveconduitsinrepairingnervedefectsinchildren
AT senesjacopo useoftubulizationnerveconduitsinrepairingnervedefectsinchildren