Cargando…

Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies

Despite intensive research on mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke, surprisingly little is known about determinants of concurrent recovery of language and motor functions in single patients. The alternative hypotheses are that the two functions might either “fight for resources” or use th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Primaßin, Annika, Scholtes, Nina, Heim, Stefan, Huber, Walter, Neuschäfer, Martina, Binkofski, Ferdinand, Werner, Cornelius J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00215
_version_ 1782394091687903232
author Primaßin, Annika
Scholtes, Nina
Heim, Stefan
Huber, Walter
Neuschäfer, Martina
Binkofski, Ferdinand
Werner, Cornelius J.
author_facet Primaßin, Annika
Scholtes, Nina
Heim, Stefan
Huber, Walter
Neuschäfer, Martina
Binkofski, Ferdinand
Werner, Cornelius J.
author_sort Primaßin, Annika
collection PubMed
description Despite intensive research on mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke, surprisingly little is known about determinants of concurrent recovery of language and motor functions in single patients. The alternative hypotheses are that the two functions might either “fight for resources” or use the same mechanisms in the recovery process. Here, we present follow-up data of four exemplary patients with different base levels of motor and language abilities. We assessed functional scales and performed exact lesion analysis to examine the connection between lesion parameters and recovery potential in each domain. Results confirm that preservation of the corticospinal tracts (CSTs) is a neural predictor for good motor recovery while preservation of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) is important for a good language recovery. However, results further indicate that even patients with large lesions in CST, AF, and superior longitudinal fasciculus, respectively, are able to recover their motor/language abilities during intensive therapy. We further found some indicators of a facilitating interaction between motor and language recovery. Patients with positive improvement of motor skills after therapy also improved in language skills, while the patients with no motor improvements were not able to gain any language recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4598579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45985792015-10-23 Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies Primaßin, Annika Scholtes, Nina Heim, Stefan Huber, Walter Neuschäfer, Martina Binkofski, Ferdinand Werner, Cornelius J. Front Neurol Neuroscience Despite intensive research on mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke, surprisingly little is known about determinants of concurrent recovery of language and motor functions in single patients. The alternative hypotheses are that the two functions might either “fight for resources” or use the same mechanisms in the recovery process. Here, we present follow-up data of four exemplary patients with different base levels of motor and language abilities. We assessed functional scales and performed exact lesion analysis to examine the connection between lesion parameters and recovery potential in each domain. Results confirm that preservation of the corticospinal tracts (CSTs) is a neural predictor for good motor recovery while preservation of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) is important for a good language recovery. However, results further indicate that even patients with large lesions in CST, AF, and superior longitudinal fasciculus, respectively, are able to recover their motor/language abilities during intensive therapy. We further found some indicators of a facilitating interaction between motor and language recovery. Patients with positive improvement of motor skills after therapy also improved in language skills, while the patients with no motor improvements were not able to gain any language recovery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4598579/ /pubmed/26500606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00215 Text en Copyright © 2015 Primaßin, Scholtes, Heim, Huber, Neuschäfer, Binkofski and Werner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Primaßin, Annika
Scholtes, Nina
Heim, Stefan
Huber, Walter
Neuschäfer, Martina
Binkofski, Ferdinand
Werner, Cornelius J.
Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies
title Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies
title_full Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies
title_fullStr Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies
title_short Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies
title_sort determinants of concurrent motor and language recovery during intensive therapy in chronic stroke patients: four single-case studies
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00215
work_keys_str_mv AT primaßinannika determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies
AT scholtesnina determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies
AT heimstefan determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies
AT huberwalter determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies
AT neuschafermartina determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies
AT binkofskiferdinand determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies
AT wernercorneliusj determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies