Cargando…
Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies
Despite intensive research on mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke, surprisingly little is known about determinants of concurrent recovery of language and motor functions in single patients. The alternative hypotheses are that the two functions might either “fight for resources” or use th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00215 |
_version_ | 1782394091687903232 |
---|---|
author | Primaßin, Annika Scholtes, Nina Heim, Stefan Huber, Walter Neuschäfer, Martina Binkofski, Ferdinand Werner, Cornelius J. |
author_facet | Primaßin, Annika Scholtes, Nina Heim, Stefan Huber, Walter Neuschäfer, Martina Binkofski, Ferdinand Werner, Cornelius J. |
author_sort | Primaßin, Annika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite intensive research on mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke, surprisingly little is known about determinants of concurrent recovery of language and motor functions in single patients. The alternative hypotheses are that the two functions might either “fight for resources” or use the same mechanisms in the recovery process. Here, we present follow-up data of four exemplary patients with different base levels of motor and language abilities. We assessed functional scales and performed exact lesion analysis to examine the connection between lesion parameters and recovery potential in each domain. Results confirm that preservation of the corticospinal tracts (CSTs) is a neural predictor for good motor recovery while preservation of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) is important for a good language recovery. However, results further indicate that even patients with large lesions in CST, AF, and superior longitudinal fasciculus, respectively, are able to recover their motor/language abilities during intensive therapy. We further found some indicators of a facilitating interaction between motor and language recovery. Patients with positive improvement of motor skills after therapy also improved in language skills, while the patients with no motor improvements were not able to gain any language recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4598579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45985792015-10-23 Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies Primaßin, Annika Scholtes, Nina Heim, Stefan Huber, Walter Neuschäfer, Martina Binkofski, Ferdinand Werner, Cornelius J. Front Neurol Neuroscience Despite intensive research on mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke, surprisingly little is known about determinants of concurrent recovery of language and motor functions in single patients. The alternative hypotheses are that the two functions might either “fight for resources” or use the same mechanisms in the recovery process. Here, we present follow-up data of four exemplary patients with different base levels of motor and language abilities. We assessed functional scales and performed exact lesion analysis to examine the connection between lesion parameters and recovery potential in each domain. Results confirm that preservation of the corticospinal tracts (CSTs) is a neural predictor for good motor recovery while preservation of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) is important for a good language recovery. However, results further indicate that even patients with large lesions in CST, AF, and superior longitudinal fasciculus, respectively, are able to recover their motor/language abilities during intensive therapy. We further found some indicators of a facilitating interaction between motor and language recovery. Patients with positive improvement of motor skills after therapy also improved in language skills, while the patients with no motor improvements were not able to gain any language recovery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4598579/ /pubmed/26500606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00215 Text en Copyright © 2015 Primaßin, Scholtes, Heim, Huber, Neuschäfer, Binkofski and Werner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Primaßin, Annika Scholtes, Nina Heim, Stefan Huber, Walter Neuschäfer, Martina Binkofski, Ferdinand Werner, Cornelius J. Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies |
title | Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies |
title_full | Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies |
title_fullStr | Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies |
title_short | Determinants of Concurrent Motor and Language Recovery during Intensive Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients: Four Single-Case Studies |
title_sort | determinants of concurrent motor and language recovery during intensive therapy in chronic stroke patients: four single-case studies |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26500606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT primaßinannika determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies AT scholtesnina determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies AT heimstefan determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies AT huberwalter determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies AT neuschafermartina determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies AT binkofskiferdinand determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies AT wernercorneliusj determinantsofconcurrentmotorandlanguagerecoveryduringintensivetherapyinchronicstrokepatientsfoursinglecasestudies |