Cargando…

The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone

The objective of this study was to investigate how the connection of superstructures to implants with different surface properties affects the surrounding bone. The right and left mandibular premolars and molars of 5 dogs were extracted. After 12 weeks, a machined implant was placed mesially and an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koretake, Katsunori, Oue, Hiroshi, Okada, Shinsuke, Takeda, Yosuke, Doi, Kazuya, Akagawa, Yasumasa, Tsuga, Kazuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb6030623
_version_ 1782394107083096064
author Koretake, Katsunori
Oue, Hiroshi
Okada, Shinsuke
Takeda, Yosuke
Doi, Kazuya
Akagawa, Yasumasa
Tsuga, Kazuhiro
author_facet Koretake, Katsunori
Oue, Hiroshi
Okada, Shinsuke
Takeda, Yosuke
Doi, Kazuya
Akagawa, Yasumasa
Tsuga, Kazuhiro
author_sort Koretake, Katsunori
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to investigate how the connection of superstructures to implants with different surface properties affects the surrounding bone. The right and left mandibular premolars and molars of 5 dogs were extracted. After 12 weeks, a machined implant was placed mesially and an anodized implant was placed distally on one side of the edentulous jaw, with the positions reversed on the opposite side. Twelve weeks after implantation, splinted superstructures were set to the implants. At 24 weeks after implantation, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured, radiographs were obtained. Removal torque values were measured and histologic observation was performed. The ISQ values at 24 weeks after implantation were not significantly different between the groups. The removal torque values were significantly different between the distal anodized and distal machined implants (p < 0.05). From 12 to 24 weeks, marginal bone losses were not significantly different between the groups. Fluorescent observation of tissue samples revealed bone-remodeling activity around all of the implants. The results of this study suggest that when implants with different surface properties are connected, machined implants at the most distal sites might be a potential risk factor for implant-bone binding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4598674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45986742015-10-15 The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone Koretake, Katsunori Oue, Hiroshi Okada, Shinsuke Takeda, Yosuke Doi, Kazuya Akagawa, Yasumasa Tsuga, Kazuhiro J Funct Biomater Article The objective of this study was to investigate how the connection of superstructures to implants with different surface properties affects the surrounding bone. The right and left mandibular premolars and molars of 5 dogs were extracted. After 12 weeks, a machined implant was placed mesially and an anodized implant was placed distally on one side of the edentulous jaw, with the positions reversed on the opposite side. Twelve weeks after implantation, splinted superstructures were set to the implants. At 24 weeks after implantation, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured, radiographs were obtained. Removal torque values were measured and histologic observation was performed. The ISQ values at 24 weeks after implantation were not significantly different between the groups. The removal torque values were significantly different between the distal anodized and distal machined implants (p < 0.05). From 12 to 24 weeks, marginal bone losses were not significantly different between the groups. Fluorescent observation of tissue samples revealed bone-remodeling activity around all of the implants. The results of this study suggest that when implants with different surface properties are connected, machined implants at the most distal sites might be a potential risk factor for implant-bone binding. MDPI 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4598674/ /pubmed/26213978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb6030623 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Koretake, Katsunori
Oue, Hiroshi
Okada, Shinsuke
Takeda, Yosuke
Doi, Kazuya
Akagawa, Yasumasa
Tsuga, Kazuhiro
The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone
title The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone
title_full The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone
title_fullStr The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone
title_short The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone
title_sort effect of superstructures connected to implants with different surface properties on the surrounding bone
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb6030623
work_keys_str_mv AT koretakekatsunori theeffectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT ouehiroshi theeffectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT okadashinsuke theeffectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT takedayosuke theeffectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT doikazuya theeffectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT akagawayasumasa theeffectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT tsugakazuhiro theeffectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT koretakekatsunori effectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT ouehiroshi effectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT okadashinsuke effectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT takedayosuke effectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT doikazuya effectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT akagawayasumasa effectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone
AT tsugakazuhiro effectofsuperstructuresconnectedtoimplantswithdifferentsurfacepropertiesonthesurroundingbone