Cargando…

Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust

The new legislation for laying hens in the European Union put a ban on conventional cages. Production systems must now provide the hens with access to a nest, a perch, and material for dust bathing. These requirements will improve the behavioral aspects of animal welfare. However, when hens are kept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: David, Bruce, Oppermann Moe, Randi, Michel, Virginie, Lund, Vonne, Mejdell, Cecilie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani5030368
_version_ 1782394110706974720
author David, Bruce
Oppermann Moe, Randi
Michel, Virginie
Lund, Vonne
Mejdell, Cecilie
author_facet David, Bruce
Oppermann Moe, Randi
Michel, Virginie
Lund, Vonne
Mejdell, Cecilie
author_sort David, Bruce
collection PubMed
description The new legislation for laying hens in the European Union put a ban on conventional cages. Production systems must now provide the hens with access to a nest, a perch, and material for dust bathing. These requirements will improve the behavioral aspects of animal welfare. However, when hens are kept with access to litter, it is a concern that polluted air may become an increased threat to health and therefore also a welfare problem. This article reviews the literature regarding the health and welfare effects birds experience when exposed to barn dust. Dust is composed of inorganic and organic compounds, from the birds themselves as well as from feed, litter, and building materials. Dust may be a vector for microorganisms and toxins. In general, studies indicate that housing systems where laying hens have access to litter as aviaries and floor systems consistently have higher concentrations of suspended dust than caged hens with little (furnished cages) or no access to litter (conventional cages). The higher dust levels in aviaries and floor housing are also caused by increased bird activity in the non-cage systems. There are gaps in both the basic and applied knowledge of how birds react to dust and aerosol contaminants, i.e., what levels they find aversive and/or impair health. Nevertheless, high dust levels may compromise the health and welfare of both birds and their caretakers and the poor air quality often found in new poultry housing systems needs to be addressed. It is necessary to develop prophylactic measures and to refine the production systems in order to achieve the full welfare benefits of the cage ban.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4598690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45986902015-10-15 Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust David, Bruce Oppermann Moe, Randi Michel, Virginie Lund, Vonne Mejdell, Cecilie Animals (Basel) Review The new legislation for laying hens in the European Union put a ban on conventional cages. Production systems must now provide the hens with access to a nest, a perch, and material for dust bathing. These requirements will improve the behavioral aspects of animal welfare. However, when hens are kept with access to litter, it is a concern that polluted air may become an increased threat to health and therefore also a welfare problem. This article reviews the literature regarding the health and welfare effects birds experience when exposed to barn dust. Dust is composed of inorganic and organic compounds, from the birds themselves as well as from feed, litter, and building materials. Dust may be a vector for microorganisms and toxins. In general, studies indicate that housing systems where laying hens have access to litter as aviaries and floor systems consistently have higher concentrations of suspended dust than caged hens with little (furnished cages) or no access to litter (conventional cages). The higher dust levels in aviaries and floor housing are also caused by increased bird activity in the non-cage systems. There are gaps in both the basic and applied knowledge of how birds react to dust and aerosol contaminants, i.e., what levels they find aversive and/or impair health. Nevertheless, high dust levels may compromise the health and welfare of both birds and their caretakers and the poor air quality often found in new poultry housing systems needs to be addressed. It is necessary to develop prophylactic measures and to refine the production systems in order to achieve the full welfare benefits of the cage ban. MDPI 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4598690/ /pubmed/26479370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani5030368 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
David, Bruce
Oppermann Moe, Randi
Michel, Virginie
Lund, Vonne
Mejdell, Cecilie
Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust
title Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust
title_full Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust
title_fullStr Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust
title_full_unstemmed Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust
title_short Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I—Dust
title_sort air quality in alternative housing systems may have an impact on laying hen welfare. part i—dust
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani5030368
work_keys_str_mv AT davidbruce airqualityinalternativehousingsystemsmayhaveanimpactonlayinghenwelfarepartidust
AT oppermannmoerandi airqualityinalternativehousingsystemsmayhaveanimpactonlayinghenwelfarepartidust
AT michelvirginie airqualityinalternativehousingsystemsmayhaveanimpactonlayinghenwelfarepartidust
AT lundvonne airqualityinalternativehousingsystemsmayhaveanimpactonlayinghenwelfarepartidust
AT mejdellcecilie airqualityinalternativehousingsystemsmayhaveanimpactonlayinghenwelfarepartidust