Cargando…

Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs: anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) have now become standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer complementing chemotherapy and surgery. Because of the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xihe, Liu, Lei, Li, Kai, Li, Wusheng, Zhao, Li, Zou, Huawei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26491345
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S88179
_version_ 1782394174200348672
author Zhao, Xihe
Liu, Lei
Li, Kai
Li, Wusheng
Zhao, Li
Zou, Huawei
author_facet Zhao, Xihe
Liu, Lei
Li, Kai
Li, Wusheng
Zhao, Li
Zou, Huawei
author_sort Zhao, Xihe
collection PubMed
description The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs: anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) have now become standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer complementing chemotherapy and surgery. Because of the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons of these AIs, an indirect comparison is needed for individual treatment choice. In this network systemic assessment, the cardiovascular (CV) side effects in using anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane based on original studies on AIs vs placebo or tamoxifen were compared. We integrated all available direct and indirect evidences. The odds ratio (OR) of severe CV events for indirect comparisons between exemestane and anastrozole was 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] =0.49–2.78), letrozole and anastrozole was 1.80 (95% CI =0.40–3.92), and letrozole and exemestane was 1.46 (95% CI =0.34–3.4). OR of subgroup risk for AIs and tamoxifen were all >1 except for thrombolism risk subgroup. The results showed that the total and severe CV risk ranking is letrozole, exemestane, and anastrozole in descending order. None of the AIs showed advantages in CV events than tamoxifen except for thromboembolism event incidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4599049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45990492015-10-21 Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis Zhao, Xihe Liu, Lei Li, Kai Li, Wusheng Zhao, Li Zou, Huawei Onco Targets Ther Original Research The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs: anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) have now become standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer complementing chemotherapy and surgery. Because of the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons of these AIs, an indirect comparison is needed for individual treatment choice. In this network systemic assessment, the cardiovascular (CV) side effects in using anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane based on original studies on AIs vs placebo or tamoxifen were compared. We integrated all available direct and indirect evidences. The odds ratio (OR) of severe CV events for indirect comparisons between exemestane and anastrozole was 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] =0.49–2.78), letrozole and anastrozole was 1.80 (95% CI =0.40–3.92), and letrozole and exemestane was 1.46 (95% CI =0.34–3.4). OR of subgroup risk for AIs and tamoxifen were all >1 except for thrombolism risk subgroup. The results showed that the total and severe CV risk ranking is letrozole, exemestane, and anastrozole in descending order. None of the AIs showed advantages in CV events than tamoxifen except for thromboembolism event incidence. Dove Medical Press 2015-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4599049/ /pubmed/26491345 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S88179 Text en © 2015 Zhao et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhao, Xihe
Liu, Lei
Li, Kai
Li, Wusheng
Zhao, Li
Zou, Huawei
Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis
title Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26491345
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S88179
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxihe comparativestudyonindividualaromataseinhibitorsoncardiovascularsafetyprofileanetworkmetaanalysis
AT liulei comparativestudyonindividualaromataseinhibitorsoncardiovascularsafetyprofileanetworkmetaanalysis
AT likai comparativestudyonindividualaromataseinhibitorsoncardiovascularsafetyprofileanetworkmetaanalysis
AT liwusheng comparativestudyonindividualaromataseinhibitorsoncardiovascularsafetyprofileanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhaoli comparativestudyonindividualaromataseinhibitorsoncardiovascularsafetyprofileanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zouhuawei comparativestudyonindividualaromataseinhibitorsoncardiovascularsafetyprofileanetworkmetaanalysis