Cargando…

Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland

BACKGROUND: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with guaiac-based faecal occult-blood test (FOBT) has been reported to reduce CRC mortality in randomised trials in the 1990s, but not in routine screening, so far. In Finland, a large randomised study on biennial FOB screening for CRC was gradually...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitkäniemi, J, Seppä, K, Hakama, M, Malminiemi, O, Palva, T, Vuoristo, M-S, Järvinen, H, Paimela, H, Pikkarainen, P, Anttila, A, Elovainio, L, Hakulinen, T, Karjalainen, S, Pylkkänen, L, Rautalahti, M, Sarkeala, T, Vertio, H, Malila, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000034
_version_ 1782394199162748928
author Pitkäniemi, J
Seppä, K
Hakama, M
Malminiemi, O
Palva, T
Vuoristo, M-S
Järvinen, H
Paimela, H
Pikkarainen, P
Anttila, A
Elovainio, L
Hakulinen, T
Karjalainen, S
Pylkkänen, L
Rautalahti, M
Sarkeala, T
Vertio, H
Malila, N
author_facet Pitkäniemi, J
Seppä, K
Hakama, M
Malminiemi, O
Palva, T
Vuoristo, M-S
Järvinen, H
Paimela, H
Pikkarainen, P
Anttila, A
Elovainio, L
Hakulinen, T
Karjalainen, S
Pylkkänen, L
Rautalahti, M
Sarkeala, T
Vertio, H
Malila, N
author_sort Pitkäniemi, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with guaiac-based faecal occult-blood test (FOBT) has been reported to reduce CRC mortality in randomised trials in the 1990s, but not in routine screening, so far. In Finland, a large randomised study on biennial FOB screening for CRC was gradually nested as part of the routine health services from 2004. We evaluate the effectiveness of screening as a public health policy in the largest population so far reported. METHODS: We randomly allocated (1:1) men and women aged 60–69 years to those invited for screening and those not invited (controls), between 2004 and 2012. This resulted in 180 210 subjects in the screening arm and 180 282 in the control arm. In 2012, the programme covered 43% of the target age population in Finland. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.5 years (maximum 8.3 years), with a total of 1.6 million person-years. The CRC incidence rate ratio between the screening and control arm was 1.11 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.23). The mortality rate ratio from CRC between the screening and control arm was 1.04 (0.84 to 1.28), respectively. The CRC mortality risk ratio was 0.88 (0.66 to 1.16) and 1.33 (0.94 to 1.87) in males and females, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any effect in a randomised health services study of FOBT screening on CRC mortality. The substantial effect difference between males and females is inconsistent with the evidence from randomised clinical trials and with the recommendations of several international organisations. Even if our findings are still inconclusive, they highlight the importance of randomised evaluation when new health policies are implemented. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 002_2010_august.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4599169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45991692015-10-12 Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland Pitkäniemi, J Seppä, K Hakama, M Malminiemi, O Palva, T Vuoristo, M-S Järvinen, H Paimela, H Pikkarainen, P Anttila, A Elovainio, L Hakulinen, T Karjalainen, S Pylkkänen, L Rautalahti, M Sarkeala, T Vertio, H Malila, N BMJ Open Gastroenterol Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with guaiac-based faecal occult-blood test (FOBT) has been reported to reduce CRC mortality in randomised trials in the 1990s, but not in routine screening, so far. In Finland, a large randomised study on biennial FOB screening for CRC was gradually nested as part of the routine health services from 2004. We evaluate the effectiveness of screening as a public health policy in the largest population so far reported. METHODS: We randomly allocated (1:1) men and women aged 60–69 years to those invited for screening and those not invited (controls), between 2004 and 2012. This resulted in 180 210 subjects in the screening arm and 180 282 in the control arm. In 2012, the programme covered 43% of the target age population in Finland. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.5 years (maximum 8.3 years), with a total of 1.6 million person-years. The CRC incidence rate ratio between the screening and control arm was 1.11 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.23). The mortality rate ratio from CRC between the screening and control arm was 1.04 (0.84 to 1.28), respectively. The CRC mortality risk ratio was 0.88 (0.66 to 1.16) and 1.33 (0.94 to 1.87) in males and females, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any effect in a randomised health services study of FOBT screening on CRC mortality. The substantial effect difference between males and females is inconsistent with the evidence from randomised clinical trials and with the recommendations of several international organisations. Even if our findings are still inconclusive, they highlight the importance of randomised evaluation when new health policies are implemented. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 002_2010_august. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4599169/ /pubmed/26462283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000034 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Pitkäniemi, J
Seppä, K
Hakama, M
Malminiemi, O
Palva, T
Vuoristo, M-S
Järvinen, H
Paimela, H
Pikkarainen, P
Anttila, A
Elovainio, L
Hakulinen, T
Karjalainen, S
Pylkkänen, L
Rautalahti, M
Sarkeala, T
Vertio, H
Malila, N
Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland
title Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland
title_full Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland
title_fullStr Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland
title_short Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in Finland
title_sort effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer with a faecal occult-blood test, in finland
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000034
work_keys_str_mv AT pitkaniemij effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT seppak effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT hakamam effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT malminiemio effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT palvat effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT vuoristoms effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT jarvinenh effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT paimelah effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT pikkarainenp effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT anttilaa effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT elovainiol effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT hakulinent effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT karjalainens effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT pylkkanenl effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT rautalahtim effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT sarkealat effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT vertioh effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland
AT malilan effectivenessofscreeningforcolorectalcancerwithafaecaloccultbloodtestinfinland