Cargando…

Relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility

IMPORTANCE: This study shows that relocation of an academic ophthalmology residency program from an inpatient to an outpatient setting in western New York does not affect the consult volume but affects management patterns and follow-up rates. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects on the ophthalmolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Jorawer S, Imbrogno, Vincent M, Howard, Mary K, Cheema, Amandip S, Selvadurai, Ausra D, Bansal, Surbhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26491247
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S86142
_version_ 1782394200989368320
author Singh, Jorawer S
Imbrogno, Vincent M
Howard, Mary K
Cheema, Amandip S
Selvadurai, Ausra D
Bansal, Surbhi
author_facet Singh, Jorawer S
Imbrogno, Vincent M
Howard, Mary K
Cheema, Amandip S
Selvadurai, Ausra D
Bansal, Surbhi
author_sort Singh, Jorawer S
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: This study shows that relocation of an academic ophthalmology residency program from an inpatient to an outpatient setting in western New York does not affect the consult volume but affects management patterns and follow-up rates. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects on the ophthalmology consultation service of an academic program with relocation from a Regional Level-1 Trauma center to an outpatient facility. DESIGN: Consultation notes from 3 years before and 3 years after the University at Buffalo’s (UB) Department of Ophthalmology relocation from a Regional Level-1 Trauma center (Erie County Medical Center) to an outpatient facility (Ross Eye Institute) were obtained from hospital electronic medical records and analyzed. SETTING: Hospitalized care and institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: All inpatient or Emergency Room Ophthalmology consultation patients from the Department of Ophthalmology at UB from 2004 to 2010 (1,379 patients). EXPOSURES: None, this was a retrospective chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, reason for consult, diagnoses, and ophthalmic procedures performed by the UB Department of Ophthalmology before and after its relocation. RESULTS: Relocation to the outpatient facility did not affect consult volume (P=0.15). The number of consults focusing on ophthalmic conditions, as a percentage of the yearly total, rose 460% (P=0.0001), while systemic condition consults with ocular manifestations fell 83% (P=0.0001). Consults for ocular trauma decreased 65% (P=0.0034). Consults ending with a diagnosis of “normal exam” fell, as a percentage of the yearly total (56%, P=0.0023), while diagnoses of new ocular conditions rose 17% (P=0.00065). The percentage of consults for Medicaid patients fell 12% (P=0.0001), while those for privately insured patients rose 15% (P=0.0001). The number of ophthalmic procedures did not change, but postconsult patient follow-up fell from 23% at the Erie County Medical Center clinic to 2% after the move to Ross Eye Institute, a ≥97% decrease. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Relocation of UB’s academic Ophthalmology program from an inpatient department to an outpatient facility had no effect on its consultation patient or procedure volume, but it significantly affected the nature of consult diagnoses and decreased outpatient follow-up by >90% at the latter location. Many hospitals are creating separate outpatient facilities that may experience similar obstacles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4599177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45991772015-10-21 Relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility Singh, Jorawer S Imbrogno, Vincent M Howard, Mary K Cheema, Amandip S Selvadurai, Ausra D Bansal, Surbhi Clin Ophthalmol Original Research IMPORTANCE: This study shows that relocation of an academic ophthalmology residency program from an inpatient to an outpatient setting in western New York does not affect the consult volume but affects management patterns and follow-up rates. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects on the ophthalmology consultation service of an academic program with relocation from a Regional Level-1 Trauma center to an outpatient facility. DESIGN: Consultation notes from 3 years before and 3 years after the University at Buffalo’s (UB) Department of Ophthalmology relocation from a Regional Level-1 Trauma center (Erie County Medical Center) to an outpatient facility (Ross Eye Institute) were obtained from hospital electronic medical records and analyzed. SETTING: Hospitalized care and institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: All inpatient or Emergency Room Ophthalmology consultation patients from the Department of Ophthalmology at UB from 2004 to 2010 (1,379 patients). EXPOSURES: None, this was a retrospective chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, reason for consult, diagnoses, and ophthalmic procedures performed by the UB Department of Ophthalmology before and after its relocation. RESULTS: Relocation to the outpatient facility did not affect consult volume (P=0.15). The number of consults focusing on ophthalmic conditions, as a percentage of the yearly total, rose 460% (P=0.0001), while systemic condition consults with ocular manifestations fell 83% (P=0.0001). Consults for ocular trauma decreased 65% (P=0.0034). Consults ending with a diagnosis of “normal exam” fell, as a percentage of the yearly total (56%, P=0.0023), while diagnoses of new ocular conditions rose 17% (P=0.00065). The percentage of consults for Medicaid patients fell 12% (P=0.0001), while those for privately insured patients rose 15% (P=0.0001). The number of ophthalmic procedures did not change, but postconsult patient follow-up fell from 23% at the Erie County Medical Center clinic to 2% after the move to Ross Eye Institute, a ≥97% decrease. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Relocation of UB’s academic Ophthalmology program from an inpatient department to an outpatient facility had no effect on its consultation patient or procedure volume, but it significantly affected the nature of consult diagnoses and decreased outpatient follow-up by >90% at the latter location. Many hospitals are creating separate outpatient facilities that may experience similar obstacles. Dove Medical Press 2015-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4599177/ /pubmed/26491247 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S86142 Text en © 2015 Singh et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Singh, Jorawer S
Imbrogno, Vincent M
Howard, Mary K
Cheema, Amandip S
Selvadurai, Ausra D
Bansal, Surbhi
Relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility
title Relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility
title_full Relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility
title_fullStr Relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility
title_full_unstemmed Relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility
title_short Relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility
title_sort relocation consequences on an ophthalmology consultation service from an inpatient to outpatient facility
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26491247
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S86142
work_keys_str_mv AT singhjorawers relocationconsequencesonanophthalmologyconsultationservicefromaninpatienttooutpatientfacility
AT imbrognovincentm relocationconsequencesonanophthalmologyconsultationservicefromaninpatienttooutpatientfacility
AT howardmaryk relocationconsequencesonanophthalmologyconsultationservicefromaninpatienttooutpatientfacility
AT cheemaamandips relocationconsequencesonanophthalmologyconsultationservicefromaninpatienttooutpatientfacility
AT selvaduraiausrad relocationconsequencesonanophthalmologyconsultationservicefromaninpatienttooutpatientfacility
AT bansalsurbhi relocationconsequencesonanophthalmologyconsultationservicefromaninpatienttooutpatientfacility