Cargando…

Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Regional variation in type 2 diabetes mellitus care may affect outcomes in patients treated with intensive versus standard blood glucose control. We sought to evaluate these differences between North America and the rest of the world. METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases were searched from the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sardar, Partha, Udell, Jacob A, Chatterjee, Saurav, Bansilal, Sameer, Mukherjee, Debabrata, Farkouh, Michael E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25944874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001577
_version_ 1782394240806944768
author Sardar, Partha
Udell, Jacob A
Chatterjee, Saurav
Bansilal, Sameer
Mukherjee, Debabrata
Farkouh, Michael E
author_facet Sardar, Partha
Udell, Jacob A
Chatterjee, Saurav
Bansilal, Sameer
Mukherjee, Debabrata
Farkouh, Michael E
author_sort Sardar, Partha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regional variation in type 2 diabetes mellitus care may affect outcomes in patients treated with intensive versus standard blood glucose control. We sought to evaluate these differences between North America and the rest of the world. METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases were searched from their inception through December 2013. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of intensive therapy with standard therapy for macro- and microvascular complications in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were selected. We calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with the random-effects model. The analysis included 34 967 patients from 17 randomized controlled trials (7 in North America and 10 in the rest of the world). There were no significant differences between intensive and standard therapy groups for all-cause mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.32). For trials conducted in North America, intensive therapy compared with standard glycemic control resulted in significantly higher all-cause mortality (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.40) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.90) than trials conducted in the rest of the world (all-cause mortality OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03; interaction P=0.006; cardiovascular mortality OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.00; interaction P=0.007). Analysis of individual macro- and microvascular outcomes revealed no significant regional differences; however, the risk of severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher in trials of intensive therapy in North America (OR 3.52, 95% CI 3.07 to 4.03) compared with the rest of the world (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.47; interaction P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Randomization to intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients was associated with increases in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and severe hypoglycemia in North America compared with the rest of the world. Further investigation into the pathobiology or patient variability underlying these findings is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4599400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45994002015-10-16 Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Sardar, Partha Udell, Jacob A Chatterjee, Saurav Bansilal, Sameer Mukherjee, Debabrata Farkouh, Michael E J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Regional variation in type 2 diabetes mellitus care may affect outcomes in patients treated with intensive versus standard blood glucose control. We sought to evaluate these differences between North America and the rest of the world. METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases were searched from their inception through December 2013. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of intensive therapy with standard therapy for macro- and microvascular complications in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were selected. We calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with the random-effects model. The analysis included 34 967 patients from 17 randomized controlled trials (7 in North America and 10 in the rest of the world). There were no significant differences between intensive and standard therapy groups for all-cause mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.32). For trials conducted in North America, intensive therapy compared with standard glycemic control resulted in significantly higher all-cause mortality (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.40) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.90) than trials conducted in the rest of the world (all-cause mortality OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03; interaction P=0.006; cardiovascular mortality OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.00; interaction P=0.007). Analysis of individual macro- and microvascular outcomes revealed no significant regional differences; however, the risk of severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher in trials of intensive therapy in North America (OR 3.52, 95% CI 3.07 to 4.03) compared with the rest of the world (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.47; interaction P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Randomization to intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients was associated with increases in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and severe hypoglycemia in North America compared with the rest of the world. Further investigation into the pathobiology or patient variability underlying these findings is warranted. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4599400/ /pubmed/25944874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001577 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sardar, Partha
Udell, Jacob A
Chatterjee, Saurav
Bansilal, Sameer
Mukherjee, Debabrata
Farkouh, Michael E
Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort effect of intensive versus standard blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in different regions of the world: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25944874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001577
work_keys_str_mv AT sardarpartha effectofintensiveversusstandardbloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusindifferentregionsoftheworldsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT udelljacoba effectofintensiveversusstandardbloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusindifferentregionsoftheworldsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chatterjeesaurav effectofintensiveversusstandardbloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusindifferentregionsoftheworldsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bansilalsameer effectofintensiveversusstandardbloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusindifferentregionsoftheworldsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mukherjeedebabrata effectofintensiveversusstandardbloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusindifferentregionsoftheworldsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT farkouhmichaele effectofintensiveversusstandardbloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusindifferentregionsoftheworldsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials