Cargando…

Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?

BACKGROUND: A pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy for early presenting ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction nominally reduced 30-day cardiogenic shock and congestive heart failure compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We evaluated whether infarct size (IS) was related to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shavadia, Jay, Zheng, Yinggan, Dianati Maleki, Neda, Huber, Kurt, Halvorsen, Sigrun, Goldstein, Patrick, Gershlick, Anthony H, Wilcox, Robert, Van de Werf, Frans, Armstrong, Paul W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26304934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002049
_version_ 1782394254258077696
author Shavadia, Jay
Zheng, Yinggan
Dianati Maleki, Neda
Huber, Kurt
Halvorsen, Sigrun
Goldstein, Patrick
Gershlick, Anthony H
Wilcox, Robert
Van de Werf, Frans
Armstrong, Paul W
author_facet Shavadia, Jay
Zheng, Yinggan
Dianati Maleki, Neda
Huber, Kurt
Halvorsen, Sigrun
Goldstein, Patrick
Gershlick, Anthony H
Wilcox, Robert
Van de Werf, Frans
Armstrong, Paul W
author_sort Shavadia, Jay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy for early presenting ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction nominally reduced 30-day cardiogenic shock and congestive heart failure compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We evaluated whether infarct size (IS) was related to this finding. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the peak cardiac biomarker in patients randomized to PI versus PPCI within the Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) trial, IS was divided into 3 groups: small (≤2 times the upper limit normal [ULN]), medium (>2 to ≤5 times the upper limit normal) and large (>5 times the upper limit normal). The association between IS and 30-day shock and congestive heart failure was subsequently examined. Data on 1701 of 1892 (89.9%) patients randomized to PI (n=853, 50.1%) versus PPCI (n=848, 49.9%) within STREAM were evaluated. A higher proportion of PPCI patients had a large IS (PI versus PPCI: small, 49.8% versus 50.2%; medium, 56.9% versus 43.1%; large, 48.4% versus 51.6%; P=0.035), despite comparable intergroup ischemic times for each reperfusion strategy. As IS increased, a parallel increment in shock and congestive heart failure occurred in both treatment arms, except for the small IS group. The difference in shock and congestive heart failure in the small IS group (4.4% versus 11.6%, P=0.026) in favor of PI likely relates to higher rates of aborted myocardial infarction with the PI strategy (72.7% versus 54.3%, P=0.005). After adjustment, a trend favoring PI persisted in this subgroup (relative risk 0.40, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.06, P=0.064); no difference in treatment-related outcomes was evident in the other 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A PI strategy appears to alter the pattern of IS after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, resulting in more medium and fewer large infarcts compared with PPCI. Despite a comparable number of small infarcts, PI patients in this group had more aborted myocardial infarctions and less 30-day shock and congestive heart failure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00623623.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4599463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45994632015-10-15 Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction? Shavadia, Jay Zheng, Yinggan Dianati Maleki, Neda Huber, Kurt Halvorsen, Sigrun Goldstein, Patrick Gershlick, Anthony H Wilcox, Robert Van de Werf, Frans Armstrong, Paul W J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: A pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy for early presenting ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction nominally reduced 30-day cardiogenic shock and congestive heart failure compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We evaluated whether infarct size (IS) was related to this finding. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the peak cardiac biomarker in patients randomized to PI versus PPCI within the Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) trial, IS was divided into 3 groups: small (≤2 times the upper limit normal [ULN]), medium (>2 to ≤5 times the upper limit normal) and large (>5 times the upper limit normal). The association between IS and 30-day shock and congestive heart failure was subsequently examined. Data on 1701 of 1892 (89.9%) patients randomized to PI (n=853, 50.1%) versus PPCI (n=848, 49.9%) within STREAM were evaluated. A higher proportion of PPCI patients had a large IS (PI versus PPCI: small, 49.8% versus 50.2%; medium, 56.9% versus 43.1%; large, 48.4% versus 51.6%; P=0.035), despite comparable intergroup ischemic times for each reperfusion strategy. As IS increased, a parallel increment in shock and congestive heart failure occurred in both treatment arms, except for the small IS group. The difference in shock and congestive heart failure in the small IS group (4.4% versus 11.6%, P=0.026) in favor of PI likely relates to higher rates of aborted myocardial infarction with the PI strategy (72.7% versus 54.3%, P=0.005). After adjustment, a trend favoring PI persisted in this subgroup (relative risk 0.40, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.06, P=0.064); no difference in treatment-related outcomes was evident in the other 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A PI strategy appears to alter the pattern of IS after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, resulting in more medium and fewer large infarcts compared with PPCI. Despite a comparable number of small infarcts, PI patients in this group had more aborted myocardial infarctions and less 30-day shock and congestive heart failure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00623623. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4599463/ /pubmed/26304934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002049 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shavadia, Jay
Zheng, Yinggan
Dianati Maleki, Neda
Huber, Kurt
Halvorsen, Sigrun
Goldstein, Patrick
Gershlick, Anthony H
Wilcox, Robert
Van de Werf, Frans
Armstrong, Paul W
Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
title Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
title_full Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
title_fullStr Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
title_full_unstemmed Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
title_short Infarct Size, Shock, and Heart Failure: Does Reperfusion Strategy Matter in Early Presenting Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
title_sort infarct size, shock, and heart failure: does reperfusion strategy matter in early presenting patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26304934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002049
work_keys_str_mv AT shavadiajay infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT zhengyinggan infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT dianatimalekineda infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT huberkurt infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT halvorsensigrun infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT goldsteinpatrick infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT gershlickanthonyh infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT wilcoxrobert infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT vandewerffrans infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT armstrongpaulw infarctsizeshockandheartfailuredoesreperfusionstrategymatterinearlypresentingpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction