Cargando…

Italian Validation of Homophobia Scale (HS)

INTRODUCTION: The Homophobia Scale (HS) is a valid tool to assess homophobia. This test is self-reporting, composed of 25 items, which assesses a total score and three factors linked to homophobia: behavior/negative affect, affect/behavioral aggression, and negative cognition. AIM: The aim of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciocca, Giacomo, Capuano, Nicolina, Tuziak, Bogdan, Mollaioli, Daniele, Limoncin, Erika, Valsecchi, Diana, Carosa, Eleonora, Gravina, Giovanni L, Gianfrilli, Daniele, Lenzi, Andrea, Jannini, Emmanuele A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sm2.68
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The Homophobia Scale (HS) is a valid tool to assess homophobia. This test is self-reporting, composed of 25 items, which assesses a total score and three factors linked to homophobia: behavior/negative affect, affect/behavioral aggression, and negative cognition. AIM: The aim of this study was to validate the HS in the Italian context. METHODS: An Italian translation of the HS was carried out by two bilingual people, after which an English native translated the test back into the English language. A psychologist and sexologist checked the translated items from a clinical point of view. We recruited 100 subjects aged18–65 for the Italian validation of the HS. The Pearson coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient were performed to test the test–retest reliability and internal consistency. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A sociodemographic questionnaire including the main information as age, geographic distribution, partnership status, education, religious orientation, and sex orientation was administrated together with the translated version of HS. RESULTS: The analysis of the internal consistency showed an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.92. In the four domains, the Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.90 in behavior/negative affect, 0.94 in affect/behavioral aggression, and 0.92 in negative cognition, whereas in the total score was 0.86. The test–retest reliability showed the following results: the HS total score was r = 0.93 (P < 0.0001), behavior/negative affect was r = 0.79 (P < 0.0001), affect/behavioral aggression was r = 0.81 (P < 0.0001), and negative cognition was r = 0.75 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The Italian validation of the HS revealed the use of this self-report test to have good psychometric properties. This study offers a new tool to assess homophobia. In this regard, the HS can be introduced into the clinical praxis and into programs for the prevention of homophobic behavior.