Cargando…
A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study
AIM: INFLOW (INdacaterol eFfectiveness and utiLizatiOn in COPD: real World evaluation) was a prospective, noninterventional study assessing the effectiveness and safety of long-acting bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from the Middle East, Asia, and South...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26491281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S83071 |
_version_ | 1782394277307875328 |
---|---|
author | Juvelekian, Georges El-Sorougi, Waleed Pothirat, Chaicharn Yunus, Faisal De Guia, Teresita Kuo, Han-Pin Basu Patnaik, Shalma Pilipovic, Virginia |
author_facet | Juvelekian, Georges El-Sorougi, Waleed Pothirat, Chaicharn Yunus, Faisal De Guia, Teresita Kuo, Han-Pin Basu Patnaik, Shalma Pilipovic, Virginia |
author_sort | Juvelekian, Georges |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: INFLOW (INdacaterol eFfectiveness and utiLizatiOn in COPD: real World evaluation) was a prospective, noninterventional study assessing the effectiveness and safety of long-acting bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from the Middle East, Asia, and South Africa. METHODS: Patients newly prescribed or switched to indacaterol or other long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA), or tiotropium (monotherapy or in combination) were evaluated over 6 months. The primary endpoint was the clinical COPD questionnaire overall score at the end of the study. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 1,710 patients (mean postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 59% predicted) who received indacaterol (n=1,179), other LABA (n=68), tiotropium (n=271), indacaterol plus tiotropium (n=167), or other LABA plus tiotropium (n=25). Across treatments, clinical COPD questionnaire overall score improved from baseline by 0.81–1.26 points (all P<0.0001), 63%–84% of patients were satisfied/very satisfied, and physicians rated effectiveness as good/very good in 63%–80% of cases. The indacaterol inhaler was rated easy/very easy to use by the majority of patients, and physicians considered its use clearly understood by most patients. All treatments had acceptable tolerability. CONCLUSION: In real life clinical practice across a diverse region, indacaterol and other long-acting bronchodilators improved health status and were well regarded by patients and physicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4599566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45995662015-10-21 A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study Juvelekian, Georges El-Sorougi, Waleed Pothirat, Chaicharn Yunus, Faisal De Guia, Teresita Kuo, Han-Pin Basu Patnaik, Shalma Pilipovic, Virginia Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research AIM: INFLOW (INdacaterol eFfectiveness and utiLizatiOn in COPD: real World evaluation) was a prospective, noninterventional study assessing the effectiveness and safety of long-acting bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from the Middle East, Asia, and South Africa. METHODS: Patients newly prescribed or switched to indacaterol or other long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA), or tiotropium (monotherapy or in combination) were evaluated over 6 months. The primary endpoint was the clinical COPD questionnaire overall score at the end of the study. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 1,710 patients (mean postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 59% predicted) who received indacaterol (n=1,179), other LABA (n=68), tiotropium (n=271), indacaterol plus tiotropium (n=167), or other LABA plus tiotropium (n=25). Across treatments, clinical COPD questionnaire overall score improved from baseline by 0.81–1.26 points (all P<0.0001), 63%–84% of patients were satisfied/very satisfied, and physicians rated effectiveness as good/very good in 63%–80% of cases. The indacaterol inhaler was rated easy/very easy to use by the majority of patients, and physicians considered its use clearly understood by most patients. All treatments had acceptable tolerability. CONCLUSION: In real life clinical practice across a diverse region, indacaterol and other long-acting bronchodilators improved health status and were well regarded by patients and physicians. Dove Medical Press 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4599566/ /pubmed/26491281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S83071 Text en © 2015 Juvelekian et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Juvelekian, Georges El-Sorougi, Waleed Pothirat, Chaicharn Yunus, Faisal De Guia, Teresita Kuo, Han-Pin Basu Patnaik, Shalma Pilipovic, Virginia A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study |
title | A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study |
title_full | A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study |
title_fullStr | A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study |
title_full_unstemmed | A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study |
title_short | A real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in COPD: the INFLOW study |
title_sort | real-world evaluation of indacaterol and other bronchodilators in copd: the inflow study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26491281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S83071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juvelekiangeorges arealworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT elsorougiwaleed arealworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT pothiratchaicharn arealworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT yunusfaisal arealworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT deguiateresita arealworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT kuohanpin arealworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT basupatnaikshalma arealworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT pilipovicvirginia arealworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT juvelekiangeorges realworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT elsorougiwaleed realworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT pothiratchaicharn realworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT yunusfaisal realworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT deguiateresita realworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT kuohanpin realworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT basupatnaikshalma realworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy AT pilipovicvirginia realworldevaluationofindacaterolandotherbronchodilatorsincopdtheinflowstudy |