Cargando…

Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)

BACKGROUND: Surveying persons with disabilities is challenging, as targeted subjects may experience specific barriers to survey participation. Here we report on participation rates and response behaviour in a community survey of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The cross-sectiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fekete, Christine, Segerer, Wolfgang, Gemperli, Armin, Brinkhof, Martin WG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26450702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0076-0
_version_ 1782394295706189824
author Fekete, Christine
Segerer, Wolfgang
Gemperli, Armin
Brinkhof, Martin WG
author_facet Fekete, Christine
Segerer, Wolfgang
Gemperli, Armin
Brinkhof, Martin WG
author_sort Fekete, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surveying persons with disabilities is challenging, as targeted subjects may experience specific barriers to survey participation. Here we report on participation rates and response behaviour in a community survey of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The cross-sectional survey was implemented as part of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) and represents the largest population-based SCI survey in Europe including nearly 2000 persons. Design features to enhance participation rates included the division of the questionnaire volume over three successive modules; recurrent and mixed-mode reminding of non-responders; and mixed-mode options for response. METHODS: We describe participation rates of the SwiSCI community survey (absolute and cumulative cooperation, contact, response, and attrition rates) and report on response rates in relation to recruitment efforts. Potential non-response bias and the association between responders’ characteristics and response behaviour (response speed: reminding until participation; response mode: paper-pencil vs. online completion) were assessed using regression modelling. RESULTS: Over the successive modules, absolute response rates were 61.1, 80.6 and 87.3 % which resulted in cumulative response rates of 49.3 and 42.6 % for the second and third modules. Written reminders effectively increased response rates, with the first reminder showing the largest impact. Telephone reminders, partly with direct telephone interviewing, enhanced response rate to the first module, but were essentially redundant in subsequent modules. Non-response to the main module was related to current age, membership of Swiss Paraplegic Association (SPA) and time since injury, but not to gender, lesion level and preferred language of response. Response speed increased with household income, but was not associated to other sociodemographic factors, lesion characteristics or health indicators. We found significant associations between online completion and male gender, younger age, higher education, higher income, SPA membership, tetraplegia, longer time since injury, higher quality of life, and more participation restrictions. CONCLUSION: In this sample with little non-response bias, recurrent and mixed-mode reminding and mixed-mode options for response were key features of optimizing survey design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4599658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45996582015-10-10 Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) Fekete, Christine Segerer, Wolfgang Gemperli, Armin Brinkhof, Martin WG BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Surveying persons with disabilities is challenging, as targeted subjects may experience specific barriers to survey participation. Here we report on participation rates and response behaviour in a community survey of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The cross-sectional survey was implemented as part of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) and represents the largest population-based SCI survey in Europe including nearly 2000 persons. Design features to enhance participation rates included the division of the questionnaire volume over three successive modules; recurrent and mixed-mode reminding of non-responders; and mixed-mode options for response. METHODS: We describe participation rates of the SwiSCI community survey (absolute and cumulative cooperation, contact, response, and attrition rates) and report on response rates in relation to recruitment efforts. Potential non-response bias and the association between responders’ characteristics and response behaviour (response speed: reminding until participation; response mode: paper-pencil vs. online completion) were assessed using regression modelling. RESULTS: Over the successive modules, absolute response rates were 61.1, 80.6 and 87.3 % which resulted in cumulative response rates of 49.3 and 42.6 % for the second and third modules. Written reminders effectively increased response rates, with the first reminder showing the largest impact. Telephone reminders, partly with direct telephone interviewing, enhanced response rate to the first module, but were essentially redundant in subsequent modules. Non-response to the main module was related to current age, membership of Swiss Paraplegic Association (SPA) and time since injury, but not to gender, lesion level and preferred language of response. Response speed increased with household income, but was not associated to other sociodemographic factors, lesion characteristics or health indicators. We found significant associations between online completion and male gender, younger age, higher education, higher income, SPA membership, tetraplegia, longer time since injury, higher quality of life, and more participation restrictions. CONCLUSION: In this sample with little non-response bias, recurrent and mixed-mode reminding and mixed-mode options for response were key features of optimizing survey design. BioMed Central 2015-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4599658/ /pubmed/26450702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0076-0 Text en © Fekete et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fekete, Christine
Segerer, Wolfgang
Gemperli, Armin
Brinkhof, Martin WG
Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)
title Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)
title_full Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)
title_fullStr Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)
title_full_unstemmed Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)
title_short Participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI)
title_sort participation rates, response bias and response behaviours in the community survey of the swiss spinal cord injury cohort study (swisci)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26450702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0076-0
work_keys_str_mv AT feketechristine participationratesresponsebiasandresponsebehavioursinthecommunitysurveyoftheswissspinalcordinjurycohortstudyswisci
AT segererwolfgang participationratesresponsebiasandresponsebehavioursinthecommunitysurveyoftheswissspinalcordinjurycohortstudyswisci
AT gemperliarmin participationratesresponsebiasandresponsebehavioursinthecommunitysurveyoftheswissspinalcordinjurycohortstudyswisci
AT brinkhofmartinwg participationratesresponsebiasandresponsebehavioursinthecommunitysurveyoftheswissspinalcordinjurycohortstudyswisci
AT participationratesresponsebiasandresponsebehavioursinthecommunitysurveyoftheswissspinalcordinjurycohortstudyswisci