Cargando…

RECK is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The REversion-inducing Cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motif (RECK) is a well-known inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and cellular invasion. Although high expression levels of RECK have already been correlated with a better clinical outcome for several tumor types, its main...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Luciana R., Fujita, André, Mott, Joni D., Soares, Fernando A., Labriola, Leticia, Sogayar, Mari C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26449734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1666-2
_version_ 1782394310935707648
author Gomes, Luciana R.
Fujita, André
Mott, Joni D.
Soares, Fernando A.
Labriola, Leticia
Sogayar, Mari C.
author_facet Gomes, Luciana R.
Fujita, André
Mott, Joni D.
Soares, Fernando A.
Labriola, Leticia
Sogayar, Mari C.
author_sort Gomes, Luciana R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The REversion-inducing Cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motif (RECK) is a well-known inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and cellular invasion. Although high expression levels of RECK have already been correlated with a better clinical outcome for several tumor types, its main function, as well as its potential prognostic value for breast cancer patients, remain unclear. METHODS: The RECK expression profile was investigated in a panel of human breast cell lines with distinct aggressiveness potential. RECK functional analysis was undertaken using RNA interference methodology. RECK protein levels were also analyzed in 1040 cases of breast cancer using immunohistochemistry and tissue microarrays (TMAs). The association between RECK expression and different clinico-pathological parameters, as well as the overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival rates, were evaluated. RESULTS: Higher RECK protein expression levels were detected in more aggressive breast cancer cell lines (T4-2, MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) than in non-invasive (MCF-7 and T47D) and non-tumorigenic (S1) cell lines. Indeed, silencing RECK in MDA-MB-231 cells resulted in elevated levels of pro-MMP-9 and increased invasion compared with scrambled (control) cells, without any effect on cell proliferation. Surprisingly, by RECK immunoreactivity analysis on TMAs, we found no association between RECK positivity and survival (OS and DFS) in breast cancer patients. Even considering the different tumor subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, Her2 type and basal-like) or lymph node status, RECK remained ineffective for predicting the disease outcome. Moreover, by multivariate Cox regression analysis, we found that RECK has no prognostic impact for OS and DFS, relative to standard clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Although it continues to serve as an invasion and MMP inhibitor in breast cancer, RECK expression analysis is not useful for prognosis of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4599748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45997482015-10-10 RECK is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer Gomes, Luciana R. Fujita, André Mott, Joni D. Soares, Fernando A. Labriola, Leticia Sogayar, Mari C. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The REversion-inducing Cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motif (RECK) is a well-known inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and cellular invasion. Although high expression levels of RECK have already been correlated with a better clinical outcome for several tumor types, its main function, as well as its potential prognostic value for breast cancer patients, remain unclear. METHODS: The RECK expression profile was investigated in a panel of human breast cell lines with distinct aggressiveness potential. RECK functional analysis was undertaken using RNA interference methodology. RECK protein levels were also analyzed in 1040 cases of breast cancer using immunohistochemistry and tissue microarrays (TMAs). The association between RECK expression and different clinico-pathological parameters, as well as the overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival rates, were evaluated. RESULTS: Higher RECK protein expression levels were detected in more aggressive breast cancer cell lines (T4-2, MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) than in non-invasive (MCF-7 and T47D) and non-tumorigenic (S1) cell lines. Indeed, silencing RECK in MDA-MB-231 cells resulted in elevated levels of pro-MMP-9 and increased invasion compared with scrambled (control) cells, without any effect on cell proliferation. Surprisingly, by RECK immunoreactivity analysis on TMAs, we found no association between RECK positivity and survival (OS and DFS) in breast cancer patients. Even considering the different tumor subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, Her2 type and basal-like) or lymph node status, RECK remained ineffective for predicting the disease outcome. Moreover, by multivariate Cox regression analysis, we found that RECK has no prognostic impact for OS and DFS, relative to standard clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Although it continues to serve as an invasion and MMP inhibitor in breast cancer, RECK expression analysis is not useful for prognosis of these patients. BioMed Central 2015-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4599748/ /pubmed/26449734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1666-2 Text en © Gomes et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gomes, Luciana R.
Fujita, André
Mott, Joni D.
Soares, Fernando A.
Labriola, Leticia
Sogayar, Mari C.
RECK is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer
title RECK is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_full RECK is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_fullStr RECK is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed RECK is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_short RECK is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_sort reck is not an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26449734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1666-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gomeslucianar reckisnotanindependentprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer
AT fujitaandre reckisnotanindependentprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer
AT mottjonid reckisnotanindependentprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer
AT soaresfernandoa reckisnotanindependentprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer
AT labriolaleticia reckisnotanindependentprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer
AT sogayarmaric reckisnotanindependentprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer