Cargando…

Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing

The porcine model is frequently used during development and validation of new spinal devices, because of its likeness to the human spine. These spinal devices are frequently composed of pedicle screws with a reputation for stable fixation but which can suffer pullouts during preclinical implantation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Cann, Sophie, Cachon, Thibaut, Viguier, Eric, Miladi, Lotfi, Odent, Thierry, Rossi, Jean-Marie, Chabrand, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127463
_version_ 1782394325623111680
author Le Cann, Sophie
Cachon, Thibaut
Viguier, Eric
Miladi, Lotfi
Odent, Thierry
Rossi, Jean-Marie
Chabrand, Patrick
author_facet Le Cann, Sophie
Cachon, Thibaut
Viguier, Eric
Miladi, Lotfi
Odent, Thierry
Rossi, Jean-Marie
Chabrand, Patrick
author_sort Le Cann, Sophie
collection PubMed
description The porcine model is frequently used during development and validation of new spinal devices, because of its likeness to the human spine. These spinal devices are frequently composed of pedicle screws with a reputation for stable fixation but which can suffer pullouts during preclinical implantation on young animals, leading to high morbidity. With a view to identifying the best choices to optimize pedicle screw fixation in the porcine model, this study evaluates ex vivo the impact of weight (age) of the animal, the level of the vertebrae (lumbar or thoracic) and the type of screw anchorage (mono- or bi-cortical) on pedicle screw pullouts. Among the 80 pig vertebrae (90- and 140-day-old) tested in this study, the average screw pullout forces ranged between 419.9N and 1341.2N. In addition, statistical differences were found between test groups, pointing out the influence of the three parameters stated above. We found that the the more caudally the screws are positioned (lumbar level), the greater their pullout resistance is, moreover, screw stability increases with the age, and finally, the screws implanted with a mono-cortical anchorage sustained lower pullout forces than those implanted with a bi-cortical anchorage. We conclude that the best anchorage can be obtained with older animals, using a lumbar fixation and long screws traversing the vertebra and inducing bi-cortical anchorage. In very young animals, pedicle screw fixations need to be bi-cortical and more numerous to prevent pullout.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4599826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45998262015-10-20 Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing Le Cann, Sophie Cachon, Thibaut Viguier, Eric Miladi, Lotfi Odent, Thierry Rossi, Jean-Marie Chabrand, Patrick PLoS One Research Article The porcine model is frequently used during development and validation of new spinal devices, because of its likeness to the human spine. These spinal devices are frequently composed of pedicle screws with a reputation for stable fixation but which can suffer pullouts during preclinical implantation on young animals, leading to high morbidity. With a view to identifying the best choices to optimize pedicle screw fixation in the porcine model, this study evaluates ex vivo the impact of weight (age) of the animal, the level of the vertebrae (lumbar or thoracic) and the type of screw anchorage (mono- or bi-cortical) on pedicle screw pullouts. Among the 80 pig vertebrae (90- and 140-day-old) tested in this study, the average screw pullout forces ranged between 419.9N and 1341.2N. In addition, statistical differences were found between test groups, pointing out the influence of the three parameters stated above. We found that the the more caudally the screws are positioned (lumbar level), the greater their pullout resistance is, moreover, screw stability increases with the age, and finally, the screws implanted with a mono-cortical anchorage sustained lower pullout forces than those implanted with a bi-cortical anchorage. We conclude that the best anchorage can be obtained with older animals, using a lumbar fixation and long screws traversing the vertebra and inducing bi-cortical anchorage. In very young animals, pedicle screw fixations need to be bi-cortical and more numerous to prevent pullout. Public Library of Science 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4599826/ /pubmed/26451947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127463 Text en © 2015 Le Cann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Le Cann, Sophie
Cachon, Thibaut
Viguier, Eric
Miladi, Lotfi
Odent, Thierry
Rossi, Jean-Marie
Chabrand, Patrick
Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing
title Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing
title_full Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing
title_fullStr Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing
title_full_unstemmed Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing
title_short Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing
title_sort pedicle screw fixation study in immature porcine spines to improve pullout resistance during animal testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127463
work_keys_str_mv AT lecannsophie pediclescrewfixationstudyinimmatureporcinespinestoimprovepulloutresistanceduringanimaltesting
AT cachonthibaut pediclescrewfixationstudyinimmatureporcinespinestoimprovepulloutresistanceduringanimaltesting
AT viguiereric pediclescrewfixationstudyinimmatureporcinespinestoimprovepulloutresistanceduringanimaltesting
AT miladilotfi pediclescrewfixationstudyinimmatureporcinespinestoimprovepulloutresistanceduringanimaltesting
AT odentthierry pediclescrewfixationstudyinimmatureporcinespinestoimprovepulloutresistanceduringanimaltesting
AT rossijeanmarie pediclescrewfixationstudyinimmatureporcinespinestoimprovepulloutresistanceduringanimaltesting
AT chabrandpatrick pediclescrewfixationstudyinimmatureporcinespinestoimprovepulloutresistanceduringanimaltesting